Abstract
Skill-based prompting has become a practical mechanism for improving large language model (LLM) agents, yet existing skill acquisition methods often treat skills as experience summaries, memory entries, or direct summaries of successful demonstrations. This creates a mismatch for weaker student agents: when a student fails because it lacks task knowledge or operational strategy, its failed trajectory may not contain enough evidence to infer the missing behavior, while the teacher trajectory may be too implicit to be internalized as reusable guidance. We propose SKILL-KD, a contrastive skill distillation framework that treats skills as an explicit distillation medium between agents of different capabilities. Given a student failure and the teacher trajectory on the same task, SKILL-KD distills their actionable discrepancy into a textual skill patch, evaluates the patch by re-running the student, and iteratively refines the patch when the student still fails. To prevent repeated local updates from causing skill drift, SKILL-KD further maintains trace-linked edit histories and performs Drift-Aware Skill Consolidation, deciding whether each patch should add a new rule, delete or modify an existing rule, or be skipped. Across five agent benchmarks and two student settings, SKILL-KD consistently improves frozen student agents over fixed-model adaptation baselines.
Community
Excited to share our new work, SKILL-KD: Contrastive Skill Distillation for LLM Agents!
SKILL-KD explores a simple question: can a stronger teacher agent improve a frozen student agent without fine-tuning its weights? Instead of directly summarizing successful demonstrations, SKILL-KD contrasts the student’s failed trajectory with the teacher’s trajectory on the same task, distilling their actionable discrepancy into a textual skill patch. The patch is validated through student reruns and iteratively refined, while Drift-Aware Skill Consolidation prevents redundant, overly specific, or conflicting rules from accumulating.
Across five agent benchmarks and two teacher–student configurations, SKILL-KD consistently outperforms existing skill-learning baselines, improving the average score from 43.5 to 66.8 for Qwen3.5-4B and from 57.9 to 74.6 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. These results suggest that natural-language skills can serve as an effective and model-agnostic medium for transferring procedural knowledge between heterogeneous agents—without parameter updates.
We’d love to hear your thoughts and feedback!
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.28048 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper