Power law graph attention: exact generalization of scaled dot-product attention, empirical collapse at inference
Abstract
A new attention mechanism replaces fixed scaled dot-product attention with a learned power-law bilinear operator, with verified architecture, measured stability, and machine-checked proofs.
The Large Language Model from Power Law Decoder Representations (PLDR-LLM) and its attention, Power Law Graph Attention (PLGA), replace the fixed bilinear form of scaled dot-product attention (SDPA) with a learned, input-generated bilinear operator G_{LM}, built from a positive tensor A_{LM} by elementwise power laws. The architecture is fully specified, verified against pinned reference releases; claims are labeled theorem, conditional theorem, measurement, or conjecture. Unconditionally: PLGA contains SDPA exactly at G_{LM}=I; A_{LM} and A_P are strictly entrywise positive, with Perron-Frobenius structure on A_{LM}; the DAG regularizer has the NOTEARS walk-counting form and positivity obstructs exact acyclicity; and, under nonresonance (satisfied by standard rotary frequencies), a commutant criterion identifies which operators preserve relative-position dependence. An inference-collapse theorem: exact input invariance of deductive outputs collapses inference to generalized SDPA with a constant operator. Measured invariance: relative fluctuations of 10^{-6} and below; perturbation bounds quantify but do not certify cached inference; the assembled proxy misses the decoding margin. A conditional three-stage mechanism (rotary twirl, concentration, row-map contraction) is measured on a released checkpoint. Blockwise training and scoring under the global Gram are stated with explicit target exposure; on tested samples, block and sequential scoring select identical answers and agree on the published TruthfulQA probability-mass metric within 5times 10^{-5} per item. Self-organized criticality enters as a phenomenological framework with an intrinsic order parameter; open claims become falsifiable conjectures. Selected proof cores are machine-checked in Lean 4.
Community
PLDR-LLM: Power Law Decoder Representations
The Large Language Model from Power Law Decoder Representations (PLDR-LLM) and its attention mechanism, Power Law Graph Attention (PLGA), replace the fixed bilinear form of scaled dot-product attention (SDPA) with a learned, input-generated bilinear operator GLM, built from a positive tensor ALM via elementwise power laws.
The architecture is fully specified and verified against pinned reference releases. Claims are labeled theorem, conditional theorem, measurement, or conjecture.
Unconditional results
- PLGA contains SDPA exactly at GLM = I
- ALM and AP are strictly entrywise positive, with Perron–Frobenius structure on ALM
- The DAG regularizer has the NOTEARS walk-counting form; positivity obstructs exact acyclicity
- Under nonresonance (satisfied by standard rotary frequencies), a commutant criterion identifies which operators preserve relative-position dependence
Inference-collapse theorem
Exact input invariance of deductive outputs collapses inference to generalized SDPA with a constant operator.
Measured invariance
- Relative fluctuations of 10-6 and below
- Perturbation bounds quantify but do not certify cached inference
- The assembled proxy misses the decoding margin
Conditional mechanism
A conditional three-stage mechanism (rotary twirl, concentration, row-map contraction) is measured on a released checkpoint.
Blockwise training and scoring
Stated with explicit target exposure under the global Gram. On tested samples, block and sequential scoring select identical answers and agree on the published TruthfulQA probability-mass metric within 5×10-5 per item.
Self-organized criticality
Enters as a phenomenological framework with an intrinsic order parameter; open claims become falsifiable conjectures.
Selected proof cores are machine-checked in Lean 4.
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608.10288 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper