Papers
arxiv:2608.22872

Better Retrieval, Worse Robustness:How Multi-hop RAG Amplifies Upstream ASR Errors

Published on Aug 24
· Submitted by
Zhenghua Bao
on Aug 25
Authors:

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation extensions amplify automatic speech recognition errors in spoken multi-hop question answering, primarily through corrupted query entities.

Speech-based applications pass spoken queries through automatic speech recognition (ASR) before any retrieval module, so ASR errors enter the pipeline as a fixed upstream constraint. We empirically test whether two extensions to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), entity-graph linking and iterative reformulation, absorb or amplify these errors. Using four English accents synthesized through neural TTS, we evaluate four RAG configurations on three multi-hop QA benchmarks (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA and MuSiQue) against a clean-text oracle. Although the structurally richer configurations generally retain higher absolute F1 under ASR input, both extensions amplify the error: the F1 gap from clean text to the highest-WER accent is 36-67% larger under their combination than under naive dense retrieval, on all three benchmarks. The dominant failure mode is corruption of one or more query entities, accounting for 87-96% of degradation cases on 2WikiMultiHopQA across all four methods. Two lightweight surface-form mitigations leave most of the gap intact, indicating that downstream retrieval structure amplifies remaining entity errors. We release code and data at https://github.com/ZhenghuaBao/spoken-multihop-rag .

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

Speech interfaces put ASR in front of retrieval, so the query a RAG system sees is already corrupted. We test whether the standard multi-hop methods, entity-graph linking and iterative reformulation, absorb that corruption or amplify it.

The findings suggest that they amplify it. The structurally richer configurations generally reach higher absolute F1 under ASR input, but they give up more of their clean-text advantage: the gap from clean text to the highest-WER accent is 36-67% larger under IRCoT+HippoRAG2 than under naive dense retrieval, on all three benchmarks. Corruption of one or more query entities is the dominant failure mode, accounting for 87-96% of degradation cases on 2WikiMultiHopQA across all four methods.

Two lightweight surface-form mitigations, N-best decoding and phonetic entity correction, leave most of the gap intact, which points at retrieval structure rather than transcription surface form.

We release the code and a transcript dataset covering 3 multi-hop QA benchmarks x 4 English accents (3,000 questions, 12,000 rows).

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.22872
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22872 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22872 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.