Papers
arxiv:2609.38170

Adversarial Training for Pixel Diffusion

Published on Sep 29
· Submitted by
XIN LIN
on Sep 30
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Pixel diffusion models generate RGB images directly, avoiding the bottleneck of an autoencoder, yet their outputs still systematically underrepresent fine-scale natural-image statistics. We show that adversarial learning provides an effective post-training correction for this deficiency. Starting from a pretrained model, we retain its original diffusion or flow-matching objective and add an adversarial loss to the predicted output at non-high-noise timesteps, leaving the model architecture and sampling procedure unchanged. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study of adversarial post-training for pixel diffusion. Across two pixel backbones, the method jointly improves distribution fidelity, coverage, prompt alignment, and perceptual quality. We further investigate why it works. Frequency-band and power-law analyses show that the original models systematically underproduce natural-image high-frequency content, while adversarial post-training restores this missing spectral power. In contrast, perceptual loss also increases high-frequency content but sacrifices distribution fidelity and prompt alignment. Nearest-neighbor, recall, and matched no-GAN SFT controls further rule out memorization, mode dropping, and additional optimization as simple explanations. Finally, we examine the boundary of this effect. Under the tested latent diffusion configurations, the same procedure does not produce comparable joint gains and adds almost no decoded high-frequency power. These results identify direct output access to the image statistics being corrected as a key factor governing when adversarial post-training succeeds.

Community

Paper submitter

Pixel diffusion models can generate semantically strong images, yet often miss fine-scale natural image statistics. We find that adversarial post-training consistently restores this missing high-frequency detail, improving fidelity, coverage, prompt alignment, and perceptual quality across DeCo and PixelGen—without changing the model architecture or sampling procedure. Interestingly, the same effect is much weaker in latent diffusion, suggesting that direct access to the final RGB space is a key factor behind the improvement

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.38170
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38170 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38170 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38170 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.