Papers
arxiv:2610.07898

FC-SWE: Failure-Conditioned RL for Long-Horizon Software Engineering Agents

Published on Oct 6
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

FC-SWE improves reinforcement learning for software engineering agents by conditioning recovery attempts on failed patch feedback, boosting resolution rates across multiple attempts.

Repository-level software engineering (SWE) is a challenging long-horizon setting: agents must reason over extended interactions, use tools, and adapt to stateful environments. Recent work trains SWE agents with reinforcement learning methods such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which independently sample multiple trajectories per issue, test the resulting patches, and compare terminal rewards within a fixed group. However, this training setup does not reuse verifier feedback from failed patches as context for subsequent attempts, even though this feedback contains valuable diagnostic information about what went wrong. Training on recovery trajectories is challenging because the preceding outcome determines whether the next trajectory is generated, while the failed execution determines its conditioning context. We introduce FC-SWE, a failure-conditioned RL framework that incorporates recovery attempts into policy training. After a patch fails verification, FC-SWE restores the repository to its original task state and uses the failed patch and verifier feedback as context for a recovery trajectory. FC-SWE adapts GRPO to these chains of complete, multi-turn tool-use trajectories through two mechanisms. Trajectory-local rewards preserve each attempt's verifier outcome, preventing recovery success from rewarding an earlier failed patch. Active-set advantage estimation forms a comparison group from all initial and recovery trajectories actually executed for the same issue, so failed attempts remain in the group while unexecuted attempts are excluded. On all 500 SWE-bench Verified tasks under a verifier-assisted protocol, FC-SWE with Qwen3.5-4B and SWE-agent achieves 41.7% Resolved@1 and 52.8% Resolved@2, compared with 38.9% and 48.5% for GRPO. Although trained with at most two attempts per chain, FC-SWE reaches 70.7% Resolved@11 under an eleven-attempt test-time budget.

Community

FC-SWE

Excited to share FC-SWE: Failure-Conditioned RL for Long-Horizon Software Engineering Agents!

How can we train coding agents to make better use of failed attempts?

FC-SWE brings recovery into RL training. After a patch fails verification, we reset the repository and give the agent the original issue, failed patch, and verifier feedback to generate a new trajectory. Two choices organize learning across these attempts: trajectory-local rewards preserve each attempt’s own outcome, and active-set advantage estimation compares only trajectories actually executed for the same issue.

With Qwen3.5-4B and SWE-agent on all 500 SWE-bench Verified tasks, averaged over three decoding seeds:

  • 52.8% Resolved@2, versus 48.5% for our GRPO baseline.
  • 47.9% Resolved@2 when training-time failure context is removed (Fresh-retry), despite retaining failure-triggered second attempts.
  • 70.7% Resolved@11, although training uses at most two attempts per chain.

These are verifier-assisted results: the evaluation controller receives benchmark-test outcomes and diagnostic feedback between attempts. Resolved@K measures cumulative success within K attempts; it is not independent-sampling Pass@K or standard single-attempt leaderboard performance. Decoding seeds measure inference variation, not independent training runs.

We’d welcome feedback from researchers working on agent RL and software engineering agents.

📄 Paper
🔧 Training implementation
🧪 Evaluation implementation

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.07898
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.07898 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.07898 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.07898 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.