Papers
arxiv:2610.13630

Multi-Stream Attention Residuals

Published on Oct 9
· Submitted by
Xiaohan Qin (SJTU) & (SII)
on Oct 13
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Attention Residuals (AttnRes) enables content-dependent retrieval over network depth, which can be viewed as single-stream softmax attention along the depth axis. Inspired by the success of multi-head attention along the sequence axis, we introduce Multi-Stream Attention Residuals (MSAR), an extension of AttnRes that generalizes this mechanism to multi-head depth attention, yielding substantial performance gains with minimal additional overhead. MSAR draws stream diversity from sequence context through multi-scale causal convolutions, allowing different heads to retrieve historical representations through distinct contextual views while preserving the integrity of the hidden representation. The retrieved streams are combined through lightweight adaptive mixing to generate the single-stream layer input. By retaining single-stream sources and expanding them on demand, MSAR supports multi-stream computation without requiring persistent multi-stream storage or communication. Across all 12 downstream benchmarks at the 18B and 28B MoE scales, MSAR consistently outperforms prior residual variants, including standard residual connections, manifold-constrained Hyper-Connections (mHC), and AttnRes. Scaling-law experiments yield an iso-loss compute speedup of 1.58times over the standard residual baseline, compared with 1.35times for AttnRes and 1.30times for mHC. These results make MSAR a promising residual architecture for large-scale pre-training.

Community

Paper submitter

Attention Residuals (AttnRes) enables content-dependent retrieval over network depth, which can be viewed as single-stream softmax attention along the depth axis. Inspired by the success of multi-head attention along the sequence axis, we introduce Multi-Stream Attention Residuals (MSAR), an extension of AttnRes that generalizes this mechanism to multi-head depth attention, yielding substantial performance gains with minimal additional overhead. MSAR draws stream diversity from sequence context through multi-scale causal convolutions, allowing different heads to retrieve historical representations through distinct contextual views while preserving the integrity of the hidden representation. The retrieved streams are combined through lightweight adaptive mixing to generate the single-stream layer input. By retaining single-stream sources and expanding them on demand, MSAR supports multi-stream computation without requiring persistent multi-stream storage or communication. Across all 12 downstream benchmarks at the 18B and 28B MoE scales, MSAR consistently outperforms prior residual variants, including standard residual connections, manifold-constrained Hyper-Connections (mHC), and AttnRes. Scaling-law experiments yield an iso-loss compute speedup of 1.58× over the standard residual baseline, compared with 1.35× for AttnRes and 1.30× for mHC. These results make MSAR a promising residual architecture for large-scale pre-training.

Brilliant!

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Nice results. One note on prior work: multi-head depth attention for AttnRes was studied earlier in Multi-Head Attention Residuals (MHAR, https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27230, July 2026; code: https://github.com/wdlctc/multi-head-attention-residuals), which is not cited here.

Contrary to the premise in MSAR's intro that channel-splitting degrades performance, MHAR finds channel-split depth-attention heads do help at moderate H: loss is U-shaped in H with an optimum at H=4-8 (-0.061/-0.149/-0.140 vs. a standard Transformer at 100M/350M/1B), with zero extra parameters. The AttnRes ablation cited used H=16, which also over-splits in our sweep.

MSAR's conv-based streams are a different design, but it would be great to see MHAR cited and channel-split H=4-8 added as a baseline next to the "w/o conv" ablation, since that's the zero-parameter alternative to MSAR's extra conv/fusion parameters. Also opened https://github.com/jianke0604/MSAR/issues/1

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.13630
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.13630 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.13630 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 1

Collections including this paper 3