Papers
arxiv:2610.16811

X-Ragent: Tool-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Grounded Chest X-Ray Reasoning

Published on Oct 12
· Submitted by
Zhenlong Yuan
on Oct 14
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation often requires integrating visual findings with task-specific evidence rather than relying on direct visual recognition alone. While tool-augmented medical agents can supply such evidence via external modules, they often lack explicit mechanisms for learning when auxiliary evidence is needed and for preventing inapplicable quantitative evidence from entering diagnostic reasoning. To address this, we propose X-Ragent, a post-training framework for tool-augmented reinforcement learning that decouples learned auxiliary-evidence seeking from validity-gated quantitative measurement acquisition for evidence-grounded CXR reasoning. We construct Rad-CoT, a 7.7K-sample corpus combining causally ordered tool-augmented trajectories with report-style diagnostic reasoning, and use it to initialize Qwen3-VL-8B via agentic supervised fine-tuning (SFT). We then optimize the policy with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using an accuracy-gated reward that applies process-level terms for measurement consistency and auxiliary-tool cost only to correct trajectories, preventing plausible process behavior from compensating for an incorrect diagnosis. Across three CXR benchmarks, X-Ragent achieves the strongest results, including an 8.6-point improvement on the fully held-out ChestAgentBench. By seeking evidence selectively and admitting only valid measurements, X-Ragent supports more faithful and evidence-grounded CXR reasoning.

Community

X-Ragent is a post-training framework for chest X-ray reasoning that seeks auxiliary evidence only when needed and admits only valid quantitative measurements. Built on Qwen3-VL-8B, it is initialized with agentic supervised fine-tuning on the 7.7K Rad-CoT corpus and then optimized with accuracy-gated GRPO. It achieves the strongest results on three CXR benchmarks, with an 8.6-point improvement on the fully held-out ChestAgentBench, yielding more faithful, evidence-grounded diagnoses.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.16811
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.16811 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.16811 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 1

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.