Papers
arxiv:2610.25043

VLA-Rolling: Fewer Denoising Steps, Better Control via Adaptive Action Reuse

Published on Oct 18
· Submitted by
Wenqi Zhang
on Oct 21
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

VLA-Rolling improves vision-language-action model efficiency by reusing discarded action tails with adaptive denoising budgets, reducing inference cost and boosting success rates.

Flow-matching vision-language-action (VLA) models generate an action chunk by iteratively denoising Gaussian noise, but typically execute only a short prefix before replanning with updated observations. Under this receding-horizon paradigm, the unexecuted remainder---the action tail---is discarded, and the next chunk is regenerated from fresh noise. We show that this discarded tail retains transferable denoising progress: action-tail initialization can match or outperform a native 10-step Gaussian baseline using fewer denoising steps. However, the optimal denoising budget varies substantially across samples, indicating that tail reuse should be adapted to the updated environment. Based on this observation, we introduce VLA-Rolling, a lightweight inference framework that reuses action tails through three stages: action-tail inheritance, per-action confidence estimation, and confidence-guided refinement through renoising and denoising budget allocation, while the underlying VLA remains frozen. Across π_{0.5}, SmolVLA, X-VLA, and MolmoAct2 on LIBERO, MetaWorld, LIBERO-Plus, and RoboTwin 2.0, VLA-Rolling reduces action-chunk inference cost in all 16 model--benchmark pairs, achieving up to a 1.48times speedup, while improving success rate in 14 pairs by up to 15.08 percentage points. These results show that action tails are not merely discarded predictions, but reusable intermediate states that enable more efficient and accurate VLA inference. These results demonstrate that the action tail can support the generation of better actions with fewer denoising steps. Our project is available at https://chenbao123ww.github.io/VLA-Rolling/.

Community

Paper submitter

Why restart from noise when useful actions are already there? Current VLA paradigm typically execute only a short prefix before replanning with updated observations, then discard the unexecuted action tail. VLA-Rolling carries forward the unexecuted action tail and adapts its refinement to the changing scene—without modifying the frozen VLA backbone.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.25043
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.25043 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.25043 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.