How Much Feedback Is Needed to Break Template Protection? The Geometric Vulnerability of Biometric Authentication
Abstract
Biometric authentication leaks geometric information enabling precise template reconstruction from binary feedback, and diffusion priors reduce query costs significantly.
Biometric authentication systems increasingly use privacy-preserving mechanisms to protect sensitive templates. However, the authentication interface itself may still leak information that enables reconstruction attacks. Prior attacks exploit released similarity scores, whereas more advanced systems reveal only the binary accept/reject decision. This binary feedback provides substantially less information, making template reconstruction far more challenging. In this work, we introduce query-efficient reconstruction attacks under extremely limited feedback, addressing two key limitations of prior attacks. First, we introduce the first attack that reconstructs protected biometric templates using only authentication success/failure feedback by exploiting the geometric constraints of biometric authentication. Second, we introduce distribution-aware query-efficient reconstruction methods for score-releasing systems, achieving a more realistic threat model by reducing the number of required queries by a factor of 5times compared to recent prior score-based attacks. Finally, we combine these two insights by incorporating a pretrained facial diffusion prior into our geometric binary attack, reducing the number of required queries by a factor of 5times. Our findings reveal a fundamental security limitation of biometric authentication: independently of the template protection mechanism, the authentication process itself exposes geometric information that can enable perfect template reconstruction up to numerical precision. Moreover, the distribution of biometric templates can be leveraged to make significantly more effective reconstruction attacks.
Community
๐ Excited to share our work: How Much Feedback Is Needed to Break Template Protection? The Geometric Vulnerability of Biometric Authentication
We show that even binary authentication feedback (accept/reject) can be sufficient to reconstruct protected biometric templates with near-perfect accuracy, regardless of the underlying template protection mechanism.
Our key findings:
- ๐ Binary feedback alone enables highly accurate template reconstruction, with reconstruction error below 1% of the authentication threshold in 97.6โ100% of cases.
- โก Distribution-aware query selection reduces the number of queries required for score-based reconstruction by up to 5ร.
- ๐ง Combining our geometric approach with a pretrained facial diffusion prior reduces the query complexity of binary-feedback reconstruction by approximately 5ร.
Our results highlight a fundamental security limitation: protecting stored biometric templates is not necessarily sufficient when the authentication interface itself leaks geometric information.
๐ Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25118
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- A Valid Watermark Is Not a Valid Identity: Spatial-Spectral Adversarial Face Evasion with Watermark Preservation (2026)
- GhostFaceMPC: Privacy-Preserving Face Recognition with Multi-Party Computation (2026)
- FBAN: A Fully Homomorphic Encryption Compatible Bottleneck Attention Network for Privacy-Preserving Behavioral Authentication (2026)
- Learning-Based Reconstruction Attacks on Coordinate-Obfuscated Point Clouds (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.25118 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper