Papers
arxiv:2610.33718

RoboJev: An Open Vision-Language Judge for Robot Success Detection

Published on Oct 24
· Submitted by
Josef Chen
on Oct 27
Authors:

Abstract

RoboJev-27B is an open-weight vision-language model that predicts robot manipulation success from video frames using LoRA fine-tuning, calibrated token readouts, and source-specific regularization, achieving high accuracy and generalization across labs and robots.

Many robot manipulation videos do not indicate whether the task was successfully completed. RoboJev-27B is an open-weight vision-language model that takes a task instruction, 10 frames of a manipulation attempt, and (if available) final frames from auxiliary cameras and predicts whether the robot accomplished the task. RoboJev-27B is a variant of JEV-27B-VL, trained with a rank-32 LoRA adapter on the language model only (keeping the vision encoder frozen) using 52,598 episode records. It also uses a source-specific KL penalty that applies only to research data, anchoring predictions closer to the original model on those sources. It uses a calibrated two-token readout that outputs success/failure probabilities in a single forward pass. On 268 held-out episodes of the same robot model (SO-101), RoboJev-27B attains 95.2% balanced accuracy and 0.993 AUROC. It also generalises to episodes collected by unseen labs/robots (AUROC = 0.890 over 459 episodes) as well as to clearly labelled community-collected episodes (accuracy = 93.3% over 135 episodes), where the base model attains an AUROC = 0.900 on the unseen-lab/robot subset with the same inputs. It takes 0.26 seconds per episode (median, serial) to infer on a single H100, which is about \0.19 per 1,000 success predictions at 2.69 per GPU-hour (not including media processing and serving costs). RoboJev-27B is released together with its inference code, along with a transparent evaluation: 20,628 predictions organized into 29 model/protocol entries are made available to facilitate browsing and to enable reproducible benchmarking of success detection. We also compare against strong API-based frontier VLMs, which take in fewer input frames (4 images from the primary camera only); note that this comparison is not strictly like-for-like because RoboJev-27B is given more frames at inference.

Community

Paper submitter

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.33718 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.33718 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.33718 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.