Papers
arxiv:2610.38637

On-Policy Self-Distillation with Teacher Evolution

Published on Oct 28
· Submitted by
Shufan Shen
on Nov 3
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation improves on-policy self-distillation by continuously enhancing self-teaching reliability through reward-guided teacher optimization and adaptive down-weighting of unreliable samples.

On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), which aligns a student model's token-level distribution with that of its self-teacher prompted by privileged context, has emerged as a promising direction to mitigate reward sparsity in sequence-level post-training paradigms. However, OPSD often fails to achieve continuous performance gains during training. In this paper, we find that the model's limited self-teaching capability underlies this phenomenon by generating unreliable guidance on certain samples. To address this problem, we propose Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation (TESD), which enables the self-teacher to generate rollouts and receive environmental feedback based on task correctness and context independence. First, using these rewards as training objectives, we perform teacher-oriented optimization to continuously enhance the model's self-teaching capability during distillation. Second, by estimating teacher guidance reliability from these rewards, we apply adaptive student-oriented optimization to down-weight samples with unreliable guidance. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and model scales show that TESD consistently outperforms representative token-level and sequence-level methods, highlighting the necessity of improving supervision quality in OPSD.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

We wanted to solve a frustrating problem in On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD): the "self-teacher" model often gets blinded by the privileged context and gives pretty unreliable, overconfident token-level guidance, which ends up misleading the student model.

To fix this, we proposed TESD (Teacher-Evolution Self-Distillation):

  1. We let the teacher evolve dynamically by optimizing it with environment feedback.
  2. We automatically down-weight those training samples where the teacher's guidance is deemed unreliable.

As a result, TESD consistently beats standard token-level distillation (like SDPO) and even sequence-level RL (like GRPO) across benchmarks like SciKnowEval and Tooluse.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.38637
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.38637 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.38637 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.38637 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.