VisSearch-Bench: Evaluating Long Horizon Visual Search in Multimodal Agents
Abstract
VisSearch-Bench evaluates multimodal agents on visually intensive search tasks that require integrating visual context with external information, showing that even the best system fully solves only 26.47% of tasks.
Multimodal agents use web and image tools to answer questions beyond their internal knowledge. Some search tasks use images mainly to identify an initial entity, then rely on text retrieval. These tasks offer limited insight into how agents connect information across images, objects, and search steps. We therefore focus on visual context management. This involves organizing and using visual information and linking it to other findings during search. Visually intensive tasks require agents to combine object appearance, local details, or spatial relations with external information. We introduce VisSearch-Bench, with 204 human-written tasks across 7 main domains and 25 subdomains. It covers Set-wise Visual Search, Sequential Visual Search, Hybrid Wide-Deep Search, Competitive Visual Disambiguation, and Visual-Structure-Guided Search. Each task provides a reference answer, traceable evidence, and scoring rules. Accuracy measures complete task success, while Process Score measures the correctness and completeness of individual results and subquestion answers. Across 16 multimodal models, the best system fully solves only 26.47% of tasks, even with search tools. These results highlight the challenge of linking visual evidence with search results to produce complete answers.
Community
VisSearch-Bench evaluates how multimodal agents organize and use visual evidence during long-horizon web search. It contains 204 human-written tasks across five search categories, spanning 7 domains and 25 subdomains. The tasks require agents to connect information across images, objects, and search steps to compare candidates, follow visual clues, and produce complete answers. Each task includes a reference answer, traceable evidence, and scoring rules. Evaluation measures both full task success and the correctness and completeness of individual results. Across 16 multimodal models, the best system fully solves only 26.47% of tasks, highlighting the challenge of managing visual context even with search tools.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper