Create ReadMe

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+language:
+- en
+metrics:
+- f1
+pipeline_tag: text-classification
+tags:
+- classification
+- framing
+- MediaFrames
+- argument classification
+- multilabel
+- RoBERTa-base
+---
+
+A model for predicting a subset of MediaFrames given an argument (has not to be structured in premise/ conclusion or something else). To investigate the generic frame classes, have a look at [The Media Frames Corpus: Annotations of Frames Across Issues](https://aclanthology.org/P15-2072/)
+
+Also, this model was fine-tuned on the data provided by [this paper](https://aclanthology.org/P15-2072/). To be precise, we did the following:
+
+> To apply these frames to arguments from DDO, we fine-tune a range of classifiers on a comprehensive training dataset of more than 10,000 newspaper articles that discuss immigration, same-sex marriage, and marijuana, containing 146,001 labeled text spans labeled with a single MediaFrame-class per annotator. To apply this dataset to our argumentative domain, we broaden the annotated spans to sentence level (see [here](https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/itit-2020-0054/html)). Since an argument can address more than a single frame, we design the argument-frame classification task as a multi-label problem by combining all annotations for a sentence into a frame target set. In addition, to broaden the target frame sets, we create new instances merging two instances by combining their textual representation and unifying their target frame set.
+
+On the test split of this composed dataset, we measure the following performances:
+
+````txt
+    "test_macro avg -> f1-score": 0.7323500703250138,
+    "test_macro avg -> precision": 0.7240108073952866,
+    "test_macro avg -> recall": 0.7413112856192988,
+    "test_macro avg -> support": 27705,
+    "test_micro avg -> f1-score": 0.7956475205137353,
+    "test_micro avg -> precision": 0.7865279492153059,
+    "test_micro avg -> recall": 0.804981050351922,
+    "test_micro avg -> support": 27705,
+````