Instructions to use picket-cliff/deepl-project-model with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use picket-cliff/deepl-project-model with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-classification", model="picket-cliff/deepl-project-model")# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("picket-cliff/deepl-project-model") model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("picket-cliff/deepl-project-model") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ metrics:
|
|
| 6 |
- f1
|
| 7 |
base_model:
|
| 8 |
- distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
---
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
# Model Card for Model ID
|
|
@@ -17,184 +20,65 @@ Text classification Model for Spam Detection (Deep Learning Project).
|
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
### Model Description
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
- **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
- **Model type:** Binary Text Classification
|
| 26 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):**
|
| 27 |
- **Finetuned from model:** DistilBERT
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-
### Model Sources
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
- **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 34 |
-
- **
|
| 35 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
## Uses
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
### Direct Use
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
-
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
## Training Details
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
### Training Data
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 86 |
-
|
| 87 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 88 |
-
|
| 89 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
|
|
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
-
- **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
## Evaluation
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
#### Testing Data
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
#### Metrics
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
### Results
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
#### Summary
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
|
| 136 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 149 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 150 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 152 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 155 |
-
|
| 156 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 159 |
-
|
| 160 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
-
#### Hardware
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 167 |
-
|
| 168 |
-
#### Software
|
| 169 |
-
|
| 170 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 171 |
-
|
| 172 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 179 |
-
|
| 180 |
-
**APA:**
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 183 |
-
|
| 184 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 185 |
-
|
| 186 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
| 187 |
-
|
| 188 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
| 195 |
-
|
| 196 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 197 |
-
|
| 198 |
-
## Model Card Contact
|
| 199 |
-
|
| 200 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
- f1
|
| 7 |
base_model:
|
| 8 |
- distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased
|
| 9 |
+
datasets:
|
| 10 |
+
- AbdulHadi806/mail_spam_ham_dataset
|
| 11 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# Model Card for Model ID
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
### Model Description
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
Model developped for the "Deep Learning with Python" course Project
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
+
- **Developed by:** Diavila Rostaing Engandzi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
- **Model type:** Binary Text Classification
|
| 27 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
| 28 |
- **Finetuned from model:** DistilBERT
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
+
### Model Sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
- **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 33 |
+
- **Demo [optional]:** https://huggingface.co/picket-cliff/deepl-project
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
## Uses
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
The model is intended to be used to sort spam in emails. Clone and Run the app.py file in the Demo to see it in action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
## Training Details
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
### Training Data
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
Subset from the email_data.csv dataset [card].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
A benchmark dataset for email classification with around 5000 emailed classified between "ham" and "spam".
|
| 46 |
+
To evaluate the model, data was separated between training and test datasets (80-20 split).
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
#### Preprocessing
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
+
Deep learning models cannot process raw text; they require numerical tensors. We utilized the Hugging Face DistilBertTokenizer.
|
| 51 |
+
1. Sub-word Tokenization: Instead of splitting by spaces (which struggles with typos and rare words), DistilBERT uses WordPiece tokenization. For example, an out-of-vocabulary word might be broken into known sub-words, preventing the model from encountering "Unknown" tokens.
|
| 52 |
+
2. Special Tokens: The tokenizer automatically prepends the [CLS] (Classification) token to the start of the sequence and the [SEP] (Separator) token at the end. The final hidden state corresponding to the [CLS] token is what the model uses for the binary classification decision.
|
| 53 |
+
3. Truncation and Padding: Transformer models require fixed-size input matrices for batch processing. Based on our EDA length distribution, we set max_length = 128.
|
| 54 |
+
o Sentences longer than 128 tokens were truncated.
|
| 55 |
+
o Sentences shorter than 128 tokens were padded with the [PAD] token (ID 0).
|
| 56 |
+
4. Attention Masks: To prevent the model from performing Self-Attention on meaningless padding tokens, the tokenizer generates an attention_mask (an array of 1s for real words and 0s for padding).
|
| 57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
## Evaluation
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
Results obtained directly from training on the training dataset then evaluating the model on the testing data.
|
| 62 |
+
Result are compared to a baseline (dummy classifier) for reference.
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
#### Testing Data
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
#### Metrics
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
Accuracy, f1 score (macro and weighted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
### Results
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
When evaluated on a 80-20 split we obtained:
|
| 77 |
+
• Accuracy: 99.10%
|
| 78 |
+
• Macro Average F1-Score: 0.98
|
| 79 |
+
• Weighted Average F1-Score: 0.99
|
| 80 |
+
Meanwhile the dummy achieved 86.6% accuracy.
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
#### Summary
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
+
The model performance is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|