Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up
NJX-njx 
posted an update 3 days ago
Post
104
Friends of the community, I have recently had some new ideas.

Some time ago, I came across a research analysis from two investors at a16z. In the past year of 2025, ChatGPT actually tried to promote some new AI functions in fields such as shopping, but in fact, the effect was not good.

I think the fundamental reason lies in the user's mindset, or rather, the user's interaction logic in vertical fields. The most prominent and distinctive feature of ChatGPT is that all-encompassing dialogue box, which is also a common problem with many homogeneous AI products nowadays (it seems that without a dialogue box, the AI's capabilities are sealed off).Although it can be adapted to many scenario fields, it will appear very boring in more vertical scenarios

Ask yourself, would you prefer the image-text waterfall flow interaction in shopping scenarios like Xiaohongshu, or the monotonous search box of ChatGPT? The answer is actually obvious from the start.

For all vertical scenarios, the interaction logic was already very well-developed before the emergence of AI. The user experience brought by such interaction logic is definitely not something that a single dialogue box can replace.

And if we want to create a good AI product in a vertical field, we should think more about how to silently embed the powerful capabilities of AI into the original interaction, and continuously iterate to provide users with a better experience.@lilianweng@clem@AdinaY

That's an interesting way of accomplishing it. I would assume enough filtering would accomplish much the same with huge datasets for multi-modal AI, but focusing primarily on improving and even simplify existing scenarios with AI should be largely the goal of smol models and similar schemes to reduce the size and complexity of interactions while preserving precision and value. The focus could and should help in particular scenarios, but I admittedly don't know the particulars well enough, so I'd be largely speculating on what others may or may not be able to accomplish with current limitations.

AI wasn't helped in making hands with a particular number of fingers without a coherent way of achieving that from the start and a bunch of rather unfiltered data. It's getting better in many regards. For example, AI should have a rather good understanding of anatomy, and should probably start with bones of various animals, like anatomy courses for human students. Then, you could tell it the numbers of fingers, or to make a wing of a particular type. I'm sure lots of people have mentioned this before, but it's a good example.