praveends commited on
Commit
ae71f44
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): fa59cae

Add model card with benchmark results and training details

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +111 -199
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,199 +1,111 @@
1
- ---
2
- library_name: transformers
3
- tags: []
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Model Card for Model ID
7
-
8
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
- ## Model Details
13
-
14
- ### Model Description
15
-
16
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
17
-
18
- This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
19
-
20
- - **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
21
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
22
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
23
- - **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
24
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
25
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
26
- - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
27
-
28
- ### Model Sources [optional]
29
-
30
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
31
-
32
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
33
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
34
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
35
-
36
- ## Uses
37
-
38
- <!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
39
-
40
- ### Direct Use
41
-
42
- <!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
43
-
44
- [More Information Needed]
45
-
46
- ### Downstream Use [optional]
47
-
48
- <!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
49
-
50
- [More Information Needed]
51
-
52
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
53
-
54
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
55
-
56
- [More Information Needed]
57
-
58
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
59
-
60
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
61
-
62
- [More Information Needed]
63
-
64
- ### Recommendations
65
-
66
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
67
-
68
- Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
69
-
70
- ## How to Get Started with the Model
71
-
72
- Use the code below to get started with the model.
73
-
74
- [More Information Needed]
75
-
76
- ## Training Details
77
-
78
- ### Training Data
79
-
80
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
81
-
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
-
84
- ### Training Procedure
85
-
86
- <!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
87
-
88
- #### Preprocessing [optional]
89
-
90
- [More Information Needed]
91
-
92
-
93
- #### Training Hyperparameters
94
-
95
- - **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
96
-
97
- #### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
98
-
99
- <!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
100
-
101
- [More Information Needed]
102
-
103
- ## Evaluation
104
-
105
- <!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
106
-
107
- ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
108
-
109
- #### Testing Data
110
-
111
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
112
-
113
- [More Information Needed]
114
-
115
- #### Factors
116
-
117
- <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
118
-
119
- [More Information Needed]
120
-
121
- #### Metrics
122
-
123
- <!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
124
-
125
- [More Information Needed]
126
-
127
- ### Results
128
-
129
- [More Information Needed]
130
-
131
- #### Summary
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
- ## Model Examination [optional]
136
-
137
- <!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
138
-
139
- [More Information Needed]
140
-
141
- ## Environmental Impact
142
-
143
- <!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
144
-
145
- Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
146
-
147
- - **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
148
- - **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
149
- - **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
150
- - **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
151
- - **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
152
-
153
- ## Technical Specifications [optional]
154
-
155
- ### Model Architecture and Objective
156
-
157
- [More Information Needed]
158
-
159
- ### Compute Infrastructure
160
-
161
- [More Information Needed]
162
-
163
- #### Hardware
164
-
165
- [More Information Needed]
166
-
167
- #### Software
168
-
169
- [More Information Needed]
170
-
171
- ## Citation [optional]
172
-
173
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
174
-
175
- **BibTeX:**
176
-
177
- [More Information Needed]
178
-
179
- **APA:**
180
-
181
- [More Information Needed]
182
-
183
- ## Glossary [optional]
184
-
185
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
186
-
187
- [More Information Needed]
188
-
189
- ## More Information [optional]
190
-
191
- [More Information Needed]
192
-
193
- ## Model Card Authors [optional]
194
-
195
- [More Information Needed]
196
-
197
- ## Model Card Contact
198
-
199
- [More Information Needed]
 
1
+ ---
2
+ language:
3
+ - en
4
+ license: mit
5
+ tags:
6
+ - pyspark
7
+ - sql
8
+ - code-generation
9
+ - migration
10
+ - fintech
11
+ - fine-tuned
12
+ base_model: deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct
13
+ ---
14
+
15
+ # migration-copilot-deepseek-coder-1-3b-instruct
16
+
17
+ Fine-tuned [deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct) for enterprise SQL/HiveQL/PL-SQL/Stored Procedure → PySpark migration.
18
+
19
+ Part of the [Enterprise Migration Copilot](https://github.com/praveenkumar993/enterprise-migration-copilot) project.
20
+
21
+ ## Benchmark Results
22
+
23
+ Evaluated on 480 held-out scripts (120 per language), never seen during training:
24
+
25
+ | Language | Pass Rate |
26
+ |---|---|
27
+ | SQL | 29% |
28
+ | HiveQL | 32% |
29
+ | PL/SQL | 27% |
30
+ | Stored Procedure | 20% |
31
+ | **Overall** | **27%** |
32
+
33
+ Metrics: `syntax_valid` AND `has_pyspark_ops` AND `semantic_sim` (60% table name coverage).
34
+
35
+ ## Training Details
36
+
37
+ - **Base model**: deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-1.3b-instruct (1.3B parameters)
38
+ - **Method**: LoRA fine-tuning (r=16, alpha=32)
39
+ - **Training data**: 1,312 validated SQL→PySpark pairs
40
+ - **Data sources**: 300 hand-crafted Claude examples (99.67% validation pass rate) + 1,012 Ollama-generated pairs (79.58% pass rate)
41
+ - **Languages**: SQL, HiveQL, PL/SQL, Stored Procedures (T-SQL)
42
+ - **Epochs**: 3
43
+ - **Train loss**: 0.347 → 0.258 (best training convergence across all 3 models)
44
+ - **Eval loss**: 0.363 → 0.329
45
+ - **Hardware**: Google Colab T4 GPU (free tier)
46
+ - **Training time**: ~19 minutes (fastest training due to smallest model size)
47
+
48
+ ## Prompt Format
49
+
50
+ ```
51
+ ### Instruction:
52
+ Convert the following {SOURCE_LANGUAGE} code to PySpark.
53
+ Difficulty: {difficulty}
54
+
55
+ ### Input:
56
+ {source_code}
57
+
58
+ ### Response:
59
+ ```
60
+
61
+ ## Example
62
+
63
+ **Input (HiveQL):**
64
+ ```sql
65
+ SELECT user_id, tag
66
+ FROM user_tags
67
+ LATERAL VIEW EXPLODE(tags) t AS tag
68
+ WHERE size(tags) > 0
69
+ DISTRIBUTE BY user_id
70
+ SORT BY tag;
71
+ ```
72
+
73
+ **Output (PySpark):**
74
+ ```python
75
+ from pyspark.sql import functions as F
76
+
77
+ result = (
78
+ user_tags
79
+ .filter(F.size('tags') > 0)
80
+ .select('user_id', F.explode('tags').alias('tag'))
81
+ .repartition('user_id')
82
+ .sortWithinPartitions('tag')
83
+ )
84
+ result.show()
85
+ ```
86
+
87
+ ## Intended Use
88
+
89
+ - Enterprise legacy SQL migration to Apache Spark / Databricks
90
+ - Lightweight/edge deployment (1.3B params, smallest memory footprint of the 3 models)
91
+ - Fast prototyping and experimentation
92
+
93
+ ## Limitations
94
+
95
+ - Lowest overall accuracy (27%) due to smallest base model size
96
+ - Best training loss convergence (0.258) but smallest base model capacity limits output quality
97
+ - Stored Procedure migration accuracy is 20% — complex T-SQL constructs require manual review
98
+
99
+ ## Model Comparison
100
+
101
+ | Model | Params | Overall | Train Loss | Eval Loss |
102
+ |---|---|---|---|---|
103
+ | **deepseek-coder-1.3b** (this) | 1.3B | 27% | 0.258 | 0.329 |
104
+ | qwen2.5-coder-1.5b | 1.5B | 45% | 0.307 | 0.344 |
105
+ | phi-3.5-mini | 3.8B | 57% | 2.133 | 0.294 |
106
+
107
+ ## Links
108
+
109
+ - 📁 GitHub: [enterprise-migration-copilot](https://github.com/praveenkumar993/enterprise-migration-copilot)
110
+ - 📊 Dataset: [praveends/enterprise-migration-dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/praveends/enterprise-migration-dataset)
111
+ - 🤗 All models: [praveends](https://huggingface.co/praveends)