Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,201 +1,159 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
library_name: transformers
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
-
-
|
| 5 |
- sft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
---
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
#
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
## Model Details
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
### Model Description
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
This is the model card of a π€ transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
- **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 23 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 24 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 26 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 27 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 28 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
### Model Sources [optional]
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
- **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 35 |
-
- **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 36 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
## Uses
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
### Direct Use
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
## Training Details
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
### Training Data
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
- **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
## Evaluation
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
#### Metrics
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
-
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
|
|
|
|
| 135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
-
##
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
-
[
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 152 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 153 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
-
##
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
-
#
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
-
###
|
| 166 |
|
| 167 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
-
##
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
-
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
-
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
|
| 183 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
-
##
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
-
[
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
-
[
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
-
##
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 4 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
| 5 |
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- qwen3
|
| 7 |
- sft
|
| 8 |
+
- trl
|
| 9 |
+
- dual-mind
|
| 10 |
+
- reasoning
|
| 11 |
+
- convergent-intelligence
|
| 12 |
+
- explore-examine-response
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
# DualMind
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
**Single Architecture, Dual Cognition β The Multi-Model Collision Array on Shared Weights**
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
+
*Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division*
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
## What This Is
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
+
DualMind is a 1.7B parameter model that implements **dual-mental-modality reasoning** β a single model with two internal voices sharing the same weights, differentiated only by role tokens:
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
- **`<explore>`** β Unconstrained reasoning. Derivation, speculation, working through the problem freely.
|
| 28 |
+
- **`<examine>`** β Adversarial self-response. The model reads its own explore output and critiques it. Error detection, verification, refinement.
|
| 29 |
+
- **`<response>`** β Clean synthesis. The final answer distilled from the internal dialogue.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
+
This is the multi-model collision array collapsed into a single architecture. The dialectical structure that produces novel insights from architectural diversity (demonstrated in our [five-architecture collision experiments](https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow)) is recreated through role-conditioned generation on shared weights.
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
## Architecture
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
| Parameter | Value |
|
| 36 |
+
|-----------|-------|
|
| 37 |
+
| Architecture | Qwen3ForCausalLM |
|
| 38 |
+
| Parameters | ~2.03B (1.7B effective) |
|
| 39 |
+
| Hidden Size | 2048 |
|
| 40 |
+
| Layers | 28 |
|
| 41 |
+
| Attention Heads | 16 (Q) / 8 (KV) β GQA |
|
| 42 |
+
| Context Length | 40,960 tokens |
|
| 43 |
+
| Precision | BF16 (trained on H100) |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
## Training
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
**Base model:** [Disctil-Qwen3-1.7B](https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow/Disctil-Qwen3-1.7B) (DISC-refined uncensored Qwen3)
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
**Dataset:** [KK04/LogicInference_OA](https://huggingface.co/datasets/KK04/LogicInference_OA) β Logical inference problems transformed into the DualMind cognitive loop format.
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
**Training format:** Each CoT solution is restructured into the DualMind format:
|
| 52 |
+
- Derivation sentences β `<explore>` block (reasoning phase)
|
| 53 |
+
- Verification/checking sentences β `<examine>` block (self-critique phase)
|
| 54 |
+
- Final answer β `<response>` block (synthesis)
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
Sentence-level splitting uses trigger detection (check, verify, however, but wait, etc.) to find the natural transition from reasoning to verification, with 70/30 positional fallback.
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
**Hardware:** Colab H100, BF16 precision. 512 steps, lr 5e-6, SFT via TRL.
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
**Next iteration:** Currently training on [Crownelius/Opus-4.6-Reasoning-3300x](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Crownelius/Opus-4.6-Reasoning-3300x) β 2,160 Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning samples with pre-separated `thinking`/`solution` columns, eliminating the need for heuristic splitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
+
## Usage
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
+
```python
|
| 65 |
+
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
+
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
|
| 68 |
+
"reaperdoesntknow/DualMind",
|
| 69 |
+
torch_dtype="auto",
|
| 70 |
+
device_map="auto"
|
| 71 |
+
)
|
| 72 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/DualMind")
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
# Start the explore block β the model completes the full loop
|
| 75 |
+
prompt = (
|
| 76 |
+
"##USER:\n"
|
| 77 |
+
"Prove that the sum of two even numbers is always even.\n\n"
|
| 78 |
+
"<explore>\n"
|
| 79 |
+
)
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
| 82 |
+
output = model.generate(
|
| 83 |
+
**inputs,
|
| 84 |
+
max_new_tokens=1024,
|
| 85 |
+
do_sample=True,
|
| 86 |
+
top_p=0.9,
|
| 87 |
+
temperature=0.6,
|
| 88 |
+
repetition_penalty=1.15,
|
| 89 |
+
)
|
| 90 |
+
result = tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
|
| 91 |
+
print(result)
|
| 92 |
+
```
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
+
### Expected Output Structure
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
+
```
|
| 97 |
+
<explore>
|
| 98 |
+
[The model works through the proof freely β definitions, algebraic manipulation, etc.]
|
| 99 |
+
</explore>
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
+
<examine>
|
| 102 |
+
[The model critiques its own derivation β checks for gaps, verifies steps, catches errors]
|
| 103 |
+
</examine>
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
+
<response>
|
| 106 |
+
[Clean final answer synthesized from the internal dialogue]
|
| 107 |
+
</response>
|
| 108 |
+
```
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
+
## Why Dual Modality
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
+
Standard CoT prompting produces a single stream of reasoning. The model has one shot to get it right. DualMind gives the model a structural mechanism for self-correction:
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
+
1. **Explore** is free to make mistakes, speculate, and try approaches that might not work
|
| 115 |
+
2. **Examine** reads the explore output adversarially β it's looking for errors, not confirming correctness
|
| 116 |
+
3. **Response** has the benefit of both perspectives
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
+
This mirrors what happens in multi-model collision arrays where different architectures produce genuinely different failure modes, and the collision between them surfaces structure that neither achieves alone. DualMind recreates this dynamic within a single set of weights through role conditioning.
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
+
## Distillation Chain
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
+
```
|
| 123 |
+
Qwen3-1.7B (base)
|
| 124 |
+
β DiStil-Qwen3-1.7B-uncensored (uncensored SFT)
|
| 125 |
+
β Disctil-Qwen3-1.7B (DISC refinement)
|
| 126 |
+
β DualMind (DualMind SFT on Opus 4.6 reasoning data) β you are here
|
| 127 |
+
```
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
+
## Related Models
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
+
| Model | Description | Downloads |
|
| 132 |
+
|-------|-------------|-----------|
|
| 133 |
+
| [TopologicalQwen](https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow/TopologicalQwen) | TKD + DualMind on physics CoT | 622 |
|
| 134 |
+
| [Disctil-Qwen3-1.7B](https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow/Disctil-Qwen3-1.7B) | Parent model (DISC-refined) | 286 |
|
| 135 |
+
| [Qwen3-1.7B-Thinking-Distil](https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow/Qwen3-1.7B-Thinking-Distil) | TKD with Thinking teacher | 687 |
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
+
**[DualMind Collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/reaperdoesntknow/dualmind)** β Dual-cognition model series
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
+
**[DistilQwen Collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/reaperdoesntknow/distilqwen-69bf40ec669117e3f069ef1c)** β Full proof-weighted distillation series
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
+
Full methodology: [Structure Over Scale (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8165)](https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8165)
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
+
## Citation
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 146 |
+
@misc{colca2026dualmind,
|
| 147 |
+
title={DualMind: Dual-Mental-Modality Reasoning via Role-Conditioned Self-Critique},
|
| 148 |
+
author={Colca, Roy S.},
|
| 149 |
+
year={2026},
|
| 150 |
+
publisher={HuggingFace},
|
| 151 |
+
url={https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow/DualMind},
|
| 152 |
+
note={Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division}
|
| 153 |
+
}
|
| 154 |
+
```
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
+
---
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
+
*Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division*
|
| 159 |
+
*"Where classical analysis fails to see, we begin."*
|