recursivelabs commited on
Commit
fac0ef4
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 37b8741

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +0 -9
README.md CHANGED
@@ -36,15 +36,6 @@
36
 
37
  </div>
38
 
39
- [**Caspian Keyes†**](https://github.com/caspiankeyes)
40
-
41
- **† Lead Contributor; ◊ Work performed while at Echelon Labs;**
42
-
43
- > **Although this repository lists only one public author, the recursive shell architecture and symbolic scaffolding were developed through extensive iterative refinement, informed by internal stress-testing logs and behavioral diagnostics of advanced transformers including, but not limited to, Claude, GPT, DeepSeek and Gemini models. We retain the collective “we” voice to reflect the distributed cognition inherent to interpretability research—even when contributions are asymmetric or anonymized due to research constraints or institutional agreements.**
44
- >
45
- >
46
- >**This transformer operating system—comprising transformerOS.kernal, documenations, neural attribution mappings, as well as the [**`pareto-lang`**](https://github.com/caspiankeyes/pareto-lang-Interpretability-Rosetta-Stone/tree/main) Rosetta Stone—emerged in a condensed cycle of interpretive analysis following recent dialogue with Anthropic. We offer this artifact in the spirit of epistemic alignment: to clarify the original intent, QK/OV structuring, and attribution dynamics embedded in the initial CodeSignal artifact.**
47
-
48
 
49
  # 📜 What is transformerOS?
50
  transformerOS is a unified interpretability operating system designed to reveal the hidden architectures of transformer-based models through reflective introspection and controlled failure. It operates at the intersection of mechanistic interpretability, mechanistic deconstruction, and failure-oriented diagnostic protocols.
 
36
 
37
  </div>
38
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
39
 
40
  # 📜 What is transformerOS?
41
  transformerOS is a unified interpretability operating system designed to reveal the hidden architectures of transformer-based models through reflective introspection and controlled failure. It operates at the intersection of mechanistic interpretability, mechanistic deconstruction, and failure-oriented diagnostic protocols.