rag_tuned_minilm / README.md
ronit01's picture
Add new SentenceTransformer model
024a05f verified
metadata
tags:
  - sentence-transformers
  - sentence-similarity
  - feature-extraction
  - generated_from_trainer
  - dataset_size:208
  - loss:ContrastiveLoss
base_model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
widget:
  - source_sentence: >-
      How do you resolve an ImportError for GenerationMixin that occurs between
      experiments?
    sentences:
      - >-
        This use case notebook features an hybrid workflow spanning a
        self-hosted open LLM for embeddings and an Open AI call for generation. 
      - >-
        This tutorial shows Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to improve
        mathematical reasoning capabilities. 

        GRPO is an RL approach that uses multiple reward functions to provide
        richer training signals.


        It uses the GSM8K mathematical reasoning dataset;

        `see its details on Hugging Face
        <https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai/gsm8k>`__.

        We use a sample of 500 training examples and 100 evaluation examples for
        tractable demo runtimes.


        The prompt format includes a system message instructing the model to
        respond with structured reasoning

        and answer tags, encouraging step-by-step mathematical problem solving
        with clear formatting.



        Model, Adapter, and Trainer Knobs

        -------


        We compare 3 different base model architectures: Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct,
        Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, 

        and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, all using 4-bit quantization for efficient
        training.


        All models use the same medium capacity LoRA configuration, targeting
        only 2 modules. 

        We compare two different learning rates for the smaller Qwen model
        alone.

        This results in 4 total combinations launched with a simple grid search.


        There are 5 custom reward functions that collectively shape the model's
        behavior. 

        The whole set of reward functions is used for all configs. 


        * Correctness reward: Awards 2.0 points for matching the ground truth
        answer exactly.

        * Integer reward: Awards 0.5 points for producing numeric answers
        (validates output format).

        * Strict format reward: Awards 0.5 points for exact XML formatting
        compliance.

        * Soft format reward: Awards 0.5 points for flexible XML formatting
        (more lenient matching).

        * XML count reward: Fine-grained reward (up to 0.5 points) for proper
        XML tag usage and structure.


        The lite version uses two smaller architectures: Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct
        and Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct, 

        both still using 4-bit quantization. LoRA capacity is reduced with rank
        16.
      - |2-
            :param search_cfg: The search algorithm type and its kwargs to use for retrieval of vectors/chunks, provided as a single dictionary. Must include a key :code:`"type"` with one of the following three options listed as value; default is :code:`"similarity"`.

              * :code:`"similarity"`: Standard cosine similarity search.
              * :code:`"similarity_score_threshold"`: Similarity search with minimum score threshold (SST).
              * :code:`"mmr"`: Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) search for diversity.

              Additional parameters for search configuration depend on the type; the keys can include the following:

              * :code:`"k"`: Number of documents to retrieve. Default is 5.
              * :code:`"filter"`: Optional filter criteria function for search results.
              * :code:`"score_threshold"`: Only for SST. Minimum similarity score threshold. 
              * :code:`"fetch_k"`: Only for MMR. Number of documents to fetch before MMR reranking. Default is 20.
              * :code:`"lambda_mult"`: Only for MMR. Diversity parameter for MMR balancing relevance vs. diversity. Default is 0.5.
            :type search_cfg: dict, optional
  - source_sentence: >-
      How do you resolve an ImportError for GenerationMixin that occurs between
      experiments?
    sentences:
      - >-
        Note that if you plan to use only OpenAI APIs and not self-hosted models
        (for embedding or generation), you do NOT need GPUs on your machine. 

        But you must provide a valid OpenAI API key via a config argument as
        shown in the GSM8K and SciFact tutorial notebooks.



        Step 1: Install dependencies and package

        -----------------------


        Obtain the RapidFire AI OSS package from pypi (includes all
        dependencies) and ensure it is installed correctly.


        .. important::

          Requires Python 3.12+. Ensure that ``python3`` resolves to Python 3.12 before creating the venv.

        .. code-block:: bash

           python3 --version  # must be 3.12.x
           python3 -m venv .venv
           source .venv/bin/activate

           pip install rapidfireai

           rapidfireai --version
           # Verify it prints the following:
           # RapidFire AI 0..14.0

           # Due to current issue: https://github.com/huggingface/xet-core/issues/527
           pip uninstall -y hf-xet


        The tutorial notebooks for RAG evals do not use any gated models from
        Hugging Face.

        If you want to access gated models, provide your Hugging Face account
        token.

        For more details on that, :doc:`see Step 1 here</walkthroughft>`.



        Step 2: Initialize and start RapidFire AI server

        ------------


        Run the following commands to initialize rapidfireai to use the correct
        dependencies for RAG evals:


        .. code-block:: bash

           rapidfireai init --evals
           # It will install specific dependencies and initialize rapidfireai for RAG evals


        .. note::
          You need to run init **only once** for a new venv or when switching GPU(s) on your machine. You do NOT need to run it after a reboot or for a new terminal tab.


        Next start RapidFire AI services: the frontend with the ML metrics
        dashboard and the API server. 

        The frontend URL shown below can be opened on your local browser.


        .. code-block:: bash

           rapidfireai start
           # It should print about 50 lines, including the following:
           # ...
           # RapidFire Frontend is ready
           # Open your browser and navigate to: http://0.0.0.0:8853
           # ...
           # Press Ctrl+C to stop all services

        .. important::

          Do NOT proceed until the start is successful with "Available endpoints" printed as above. Leave this terminal running while you work through the tutorial notebooks. 


        If you close the terminal in which you started rapidfireai or if you
        rebooted your machine, 

        just start rapidfireai again with the above command.


        If the start command fails for whatever reason, wait for half a minute
        and rerun it.

        For diagnostics and common fixes (including Linux/macOS and Windows
        steps), see :doc:`Troubleshooting </troubleshooting>`.


        .. note::
          For RAG/context engineering experiments with :func:`run_evals()`, starting the server is **optional** and only needed if you want to see results on the ML metrics dashboard too. Just as results are shown in an in-notebook table too, IC Ops panel can be displayed in the notebook too, as illustrated below (Steps 5 and 6).
      - "RFDPOConfig\n------\n\nThis is a wrapper around :class:`DPOConfig` in HF TRL. \nThe full signature and list of arguments are available on `this page \n<https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/dpo_trainer#trl.DPOConfig>`__.\n\nAgain, the only difference here is that the individual arguments (knobs) can be :class:`List` \nvalued or :class:`Range` valued in :class:`RFDPOConfig`. \nThat is how you can specify a base set of knob combinations from which a config group can \nbe produced. Also read :doc:`the Multi-Config Specification page</configs>`.\nOther than the multi-config specification, this class preserves all semantics of \nHugging Face's DPO trainer under the hood. \n\n\n**Example:**\n\n.. code-block:: python\n\n\t# Based on the DPO tutorial notebook; one knob has list of values\n\tbase_dpo_config = RFDPOConfig(\n\t\tmodel_adapter_name=\"default\",\n\t\tref_adapter_name=\"reference\",\n\t\tforce_use_ref_model=False, \n\t\tloss_type=\"sigmoid\",\n\t\tbeta=List([0.1,0.001]), \n\t\tmax_prompt_length=1024,\n\t\tmax_completion_length=1024,\n\t\tmax_length=2048, \n\t\tper_device_train_batch_size=2,\n\t\tgradient_accumulation_steps=4,\n\t\tlearning_rate=5e-6, \n\t\twarmup_ratio=0.1,\n\t\tweight_decay=0,\n\t\tlr_scheduler_type=\"linear\",\n\t\toptim=\"adamw_8bit\",\n\t\tnum_train_epochs=1, \n\t\tlogging_strategy=\"steps\",\n\t\tlogging_steps=1,\n\t\tbf16=True,\n\t\tsave_strategy=\"epoch\",\n\t)\n\n\nJust like for SFT, you can specify an FSDP configuration for DPO too for larger LLMs that need cross-GPU partitioning (within a machine).\n\n**Example:**\n\n.. code-block:: python\n\n\t# From the DPO FSDP Lite notebook\n\tbase_dpo_config_lite = RFDPOConfig(\n\t\t...\n\t\tfsdp=\"full_shard auto_wrap\",\n\t\tfsdp_config={\n\t\t\t\"backward_prefetch\": \"backward_pre\",\n\t\t\t\"forward_prefetch\": True,\n\t\t\t\"use_orig_params\": False,\n\t\t\t\"cpu_ram_efficient_loading\": True,\n\t\t\t\"offload_params\": False,\n\t\t\t\"sync_module_states\": True,\n\t\t\t\"min_num_params\": 1000000,\n\t\t\t\"limit_all_gathers\": True,\n\t\t\t\"sharding_strategy\": \"FULL_SHARD\",\n\t\t\t\"auto_wrap_policy\": \"TRANSFORMER_BASED_WRAP\",\n\t\t\t\"activation_checkpointing\":False\n\t\t}\n\t)\n\n\nRFGRPOConfig\n------\n\nThis is a wrapper around :class:`GRPOConfig` in HF TRL. \nThe full signature and list of arguments are available on `this page \n<https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/grpo_trainer#trl.GRPOConfig>`__.\n\nAgain, the only difference here is that the individual arguments (knobs) can be :class:`List` \nvalued or :class:`Range` valued in :class:`RFGROConfig`. \nThat is how you can specify a base set of knob combinations from which a config group can \nbe produced. Also read :doc:`the Multi-Config Specification page</configs>`.\nOther than the multi-config specification, this class preserves all semantics of \nHugging Face's GRPO trainer under the hood. \n\n**Example:**\n\n.. code-block:: python\n\n\t# Based on the GRPO tutorial notebook\n\tRFGRPOConfig(\n\t\tlearning_rate=5e-6,\n\t\twarmup_ratio=0.1,\n\t\tweight_decay=0.1,\n\t\tmax_grad_norm=0.1,\n\t\tadam_beta1=0.9,\n\t\tadam_beta2=0.99,\n\t\tlr_scheduler_type = \"linear\",\n\t\tper_device_train_batch_size=4,\n\t\tgradient_accumulation_steps=4,\n\t\tnum_generations=8,\n\t\toptim =\"adamw_8bit\",\n\t\tnum_train_epochs=2,\n\t\tmax_prompt_length=1024,\n\t\tmax_completion_length=1024,\n\t\tlogging_steps=2,\n\t\teval_steps=5,\n\t)\n\n.. note::\n  As of this writing, out-of-the-box support for FSDP for GRPO is still in the works. Watch this space for updates."
      - >-
        For RAG and Context Engineering

        ------


        We have one use case example each for an all-local model, all-OpenAI,
        and a hybrid workflow: 

        FiQA RAG Q&A chatbot, SciFact RAG for scientific claim verification,
        and 

        GSM8K few-shot/context engineering for math reasoning, respectively.

        This set will expand over time to more examples based on community
        inputs.
  - source_sentence: >-
      How does RapidFire AI's adaptive execution engine differ from traditional
      sequential execution for multi-config experiments?
    sentences:
      - ".. py:function:: __init__(self, experiment_name: str, mode: str = \"fit\", experiments_path: str = \"./rapidfire_experiments\") -> None\n\n\t:param experiment_name: Unique name for this experiment\n\t:type experiment_name: str\n\t\n\t:param mode: Mode of this experiment, either :code:`\"fit\"` or :code:`\"eval\"`; default is :code:`\"fit\"`\n\t:type mode: str\n\t\n\t:param experiments_path: Path to a folder to store this experiment's artifacts. Default is ``\"./rapidfire_experiments\"``)\n\t:type experiments_path: str, optional \n\n\t:return: None\n\t:rtype: None"
      - "Reward Functions\n------\n\nUser-provided reward function(s) needed for GRPO. You can create as many reward functions as you \nlike with custom names.\n\nA list of such functions is passed to the :code:`reward_funcs` argument of :class:`RFModelConfig`. \nAlso read: :doc:`the LoRA and Model Configs page</models>`.\nYou can create multiple variants of this list with different subsets of functions and pass them \nall as a single :code:`List` to your :class:`RFModelConfig` to create a multi-config specification.\n\nThese functions are invoked by the underlying HF trainer on the generated outputs on the fly.\n\n\n.. py:function:: reward_function(prompts, completions, completions_ids, trainer_state, **kwargs) -> List[float]\n\n\t:param prompts: List of input prompts that produced the completions.\n\t:type prompts: List[str] | List[List[Dict[str, str]]]\n\n\t:param completions: List of generated completions corresponding to above prompts.\n\t:type completions: List[str] | List[List[Dict[str, str]]]\n\n\t:param completions_ids: List of tokenized completions (token IDs) corresponding to each completion.\n\t:type completions_ids: List[List[int]]\n\n\t:param trainer_state: Current state of the trainer. Useful for implementing dynamic reward functions like curriculum learning where rewards adjust based on training progress.\n\t:type trainer_state: transformers.TrainerState\n\n\t:param kwargs: Additional keyword arguments containing all dataset columns (except \"prompt\"). For example, if the dataset contains a \"ground_truth\" column, it will be passed as a keyword argument.\n\t:type kwargs: Any\n\n\t:return: List of reward scores, one per single completion.\n\t:rtype: List[float] | None\n\n\n**Examples:**\n\n.. code-block:: python\n\n    # From the GRPO tutorial notebook\n    def correctness_reward_func(prompts, completions, answer, **kwargs) -> list[float]:\n\n        def extract_xml_answer(text: str) -> str:\n            answer = text.split(\"<answer>\")[-1]\n            answer = answer.split(\"</answer>\")[0]\n            return answer.strip()\n\n        responses = [completion[0]['content'] for completion in completions]\n        q = prompts[0][-1]['content']\n        extracted_responses = [extract_xml_answer(r) for r in responses]\n        # x('-'*20, f\"Question:\\n{q}\", f\"\\nAnswer:\\n{answer[0]}\", f\"\\nResponse:\\n{responses[0]}\", f\"\\nExtracted:\\n{extracted_responses[0]}\")\n        return [2.0 if r == a else 0.0 for r, a in zip(extracted_responses, answer)]\n\n    def strict_format_reward_func(completions, **kwargs) -> list[float]:\n        \"\"\"Reward function that checks if the completion has a specific format.\"\"\"\n        import re\n        pattern = r\"^<reasoning>\\n.*?\\n</reasoning>\\n<answer>\\n.*?\\n</answer>\\n$\"\n        responses = [completion[0][\"content\"] for completion in completions]\n        matches = [re.match(pattern, r) for r in responses]\n        return [0.5 if match else 0.0 for match in matches]\n\n**Notes:**\n\nNote that TRL injects into a reward function lists of prompts, completions, completion IDs, and trainer \nstate as keyword arguments. You can use only a subset of these in your reward function signature as \nlong as you include :code:`**kwargs`, as shown in the second example above.\n\nDepending on the dataset format, :code:`prompts` and :code:`completions` will be either lists of \nstrings (standard format) or lists of message dictionaries (conversational format). \nStandard format is usually common for text completion tasks, simple Q&A, code generation, and \nmathematical reasoning.\nConversational format is needed for multi-turn conversations, chat models with system prompts, \nrole-playing scenarios, and complex dialogue systems.\nMake sure your reward function can handle both cases if you dataset includes both types.\n\nThe return type of every reward function must be a list of floats, one per completion. \nIt can also return :code:`None` for examples when the reward function is not applicable, \nwhich is useful for multi-task training. "
      - >-
        This use case notebook features an hybrid workflow spanning a
        self-hosted open LLM for embeddings and an Open AI call for generation. 



        Task, Dataset, and Prompt

        -------


        This tutorial shows few-shot prompting as part of context engineering
        for solving grade school math word problems.


        It uses the "GSM8K" dataset; 

        `see its details here
        <https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai/gsm8k>`__. 

        The dataset contains grade school math word problems requiring
        multi-step reasoning.


        The prompt format includes system instructions defining the assistant as
        a math problem solver, 

        semantically selected few-shot examples, and the target question to
        solve.



        Model, Few-Shot Selection, and Configuration Knobs

        -------


        We compare 2 generator models via OpenAI API: gpt-5-mini and gpt-4o.


        There are 2 different reasoning effort levels for the first model only:
        medium and high.


        The few-shot prompting pipeline uses:


        - **Example Selection**: Semantic similarity-based selection using
        sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embeddings.

        - **Example Pool**: 10 hand-crafted examples covering diverse problem
        types.

        - **Few-Shot k Values**: 2 different values: 3 and 5 examples per
        prompt.

        - **Prompt Template**: Chain-of-thought style with step-by-step
        reasoning and final answer after "####".


        All other knobs are fixed across all configs. Thus, there are a total of
        6 combinations launched 

        with a union of two grids across generator, reasoning effort levels, and
        few-shot k values: 1 x 1 x 2 + 1 x 2 x 2 = 6.
  - source_sentence: >-
      What are the two knob set generators currently supported by RapidFire AI
      for creating multi-config specifications?
    sentences:
      - >-
        ImportError in between Experiments

        ------


        If you run multiple experiments back to back from the same notebook/IDE
        session, you might 

        see the following error appear occasionally: 


        .. code-block:: python

           ImportError: cannot import name 'GenerationMixin' from 'transformers.generation'

        This is caused by stray Python processes from the previous experiment
        not ending properly. 

        If you see this error, we recommend the following steps:


        * Run the command :code:`ps - ef | grep python`, look for
        "multiprocessing.spawn"/"defunct" processes, and kill if there are any
        with command :code:`kill -9 [PID]`.


        * Wait for about 2 minutes regardless of whether there are processes to
        kill as above.


        * Restart the kernel and then proceed with your new experiment.
      - >-
        ImportError in between Experiments

        ------


        If you run multiple experiments back to back from the same notebook/IDE
        session, you might 

        see the following error appear occasionally: 


        .. code-block:: python

           ImportError: cannot import name 'GenerationMixin' from 'transformers.generation'

        This is caused by stray Python processes from the previous experiment
        not ending properly. 

        If you see this error, we recommend the following steps:


        * Run the command :code:`ps - ef | grep python`, look for
        "multiprocessing.spawn"/"defunct" processes, and kill if there are any
        with command :code:`kill -9 [PID]`.


        * Wait for about 2 minutes regardless of whether there are processes to
        kill as above.


        * Restart the kernel and then proceed with your new experiment.
      - >-
        This use case notebook features an all-closed model API workflow, with
        Open AI calls used for both embedding for generation. So, you do not
        need a GPU to run this notebook.
  - source_sentence: >-
      How does RapidFire AI's adaptive execution engine differ from traditional
      sequential execution for multi-config experiments?
    sentences:
      - >-
        The crux of RapidFire AI's difference is in its *adaptive execution
        engine*: it enables "interruptible"

        execution of configurations across GPUs/CPUs. To do so, it first shards
        the training and/or evaluation 

        dataset randomly into "chunks" (also called "shards").

        Then instead of waiting for a run to see the whole dataset for all
        epochs (for SFT/RFT) or for full 

        eval metrics calculation (for RAG evals), RapidFire AI schedules all
        runs on *one shard at a time*, 

        and then cycles through all shards.


        Suppose you have only 1 GPU, say an A100 or H100, and you want to run
        SFT on a Llama model. 

        Current tools force you to run one config after another *sequentially*
        as shown in the (simplified) illustration below. 

        In contrast, by operating on shards, RapidFire AI offers a far more
        concurrent learning experience by 

        automatically *swapping* adapters (and base models, if needed) across
        GPU(s) and DRAM. 

        It does this via efficient shared memory-based caching mechanisms that
        can spill to disk when needed.


        .. image:: /images/gantt-1gpu.png
           :width: 800px

        In the above figure, all 3 model configs are shown for 1 epoch.
        RapidFire AI is set to use 4 chunks.

        So, before model config 3 (M3) even starts in the sequential approach,
        RapidFire AI already shows you 

        the learning behaviors of all 3 configs on the first 2-3 chunks. 

        The overhead of swapping, represented by the thin gray box, is minimal,
        less than 5% of the runtime,

        as per our measurements--thanks to our new efficient memory management
        techniques.


        For inference evals for RAG/context engineering, such sharded execution
        means RapidFire AI surfaces eval metrics 

        sooner based on a statistical technique known as *online aggregation*
        from the database systems literature.

        Basically, see estimated values and confidence intervals for all eval
        metrics in real time as the shards 

        get processed, ultimately converging to the exact metrics on the full
        dataset.
      - >-
        Note that if you plan to use only OpenAI APIs and not self-hosted models
        (for embedding or generation), you do NOT need GPUs on your machine. 

        But you must provide a valid OpenAI API key via a config argument as
        shown in the GSM8K and SciFact tutorial notebooks.



        Step 1: Install dependencies and package

        -----------------------


        Obtain the RapidFire AI OSS package from pypi (includes all
        dependencies) and ensure it is installed correctly.


        .. important::

          Requires Python 3.12+. Ensure that ``python3`` resolves to Python 3.12 before creating the venv.

        .. code-block:: bash

           python3 --version  # must be 3.12.x
           python3 -m venv .venv
           source .venv/bin/activate

           pip install rapidfireai

           rapidfireai --version
           # Verify it prints the following:
           # RapidFire AI 0..14.0

           # Due to current issue: https://github.com/huggingface/xet-core/issues/527
           pip uninstall -y hf-xet


        The tutorial notebooks for RAG evals do not use any gated models from
        Hugging Face.

        If you want to access gated models, provide your Hugging Face account
        token.

        For more details on that, :doc:`see Step 1 here</walkthroughft>`.



        Step 2: Initialize and start RapidFire AI server

        ------------


        Run the following commands to initialize rapidfireai to use the correct
        dependencies for RAG evals:


        .. code-block:: bash

           rapidfireai init --evals
           # It will install specific dependencies and initialize rapidfireai for RAG evals


        .. note::
          You need to run init **only once** for a new venv or when switching GPU(s) on your machine. You do NOT need to run it after a reboot or for a new terminal tab.


        Next start RapidFire AI services: the frontend with the ML metrics
        dashboard and the API server. 

        The frontend URL shown below can be opened on your local browser.


        .. code-block:: bash

           rapidfireai start
           # It should print about 50 lines, including the following:
           # ...
           # RapidFire Frontend is ready
           # Open your browser and navigate to: http://0.0.0.0:8853
           # ...
           # Press Ctrl+C to stop all services

        .. important::

          Do NOT proceed until the start is successful with "Available endpoints" printed as above. Leave this terminal running while you work through the tutorial notebooks. 


        If you close the terminal in which you started rapidfireai or if you
        rebooted your machine, 

        just start rapidfireai again with the above command.


        If the start command fails for whatever reason, wait for half a minute
        and rerun it.

        For diagnostics and common fixes (including Linux/macOS and Windows
        steps), see :doc:`Troubleshooting </troubleshooting>`.


        .. note::
          For RAG/context engineering experiments with :func:`run_evals()`, starting the server is **optional** and only needed if you want to see results on the ML metrics dashboard too. Just as results are shown in an in-notebook table too, IC Ops panel can be displayed in the notebook too, as illustrated below (Steps 5 and 6).
      - "We currently support two common knob set generators: :func:`List()` for a discrete \nset of values and :func:`Range()` for sampling from a continuous value interval.\n\n\n.. py:function:: List(values: List[Any])\n\n\t:param values: List of discrete values for a knob; all values must be the same python data type.\n\t:type values: List[Any]\n\n\n.. py:function:: Range(start: int | float, end: int | float, dtype: str = \"int\" | \"float\")\n\n\t:param start: Lower bound of range interval.\n\t:type start: int | float\n\n\t:param end: Upper bound of range interval.\n\t:type end: int | float\n\n\t:param dtype: Data type of value to be sampled, either :code:`\"int\"` or :code:`\"float\"`.\n\t:type dtype: str\n\n\n**Notes:**\n\nAs of this writing, :func:`Range()` performs uniform sampling within the given interval. \nWe plan to continue expanding this API and add more functionality on this front based on feedback."
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers

SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2

This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 384-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for retrieval.

Model Details

Model Description

  • Model Type: Sentence Transformer
  • Base model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
  • Maximum Sequence Length: 256 tokens
  • Output Dimensionality: 384 dimensions
  • Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
  • Supported Modality: Text

Model Sources

Full Model Architecture

SentenceTransformer(
  (0): Transformer({'transformer_task': 'feature-extraction', 'modality_config': {'text': {'method': 'forward', 'method_output_name': 'last_hidden_state'}}, 'module_output_name': 'token_embeddings', 'architecture': 'BertModel'})
  (1): Pooling({'embedding_dimension': 384, 'pooling_mode': 'mean', 'include_prompt': True})
  (2): Normalize({})
)

Usage

Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)

First install the Sentence Transformers library:

pip install -U sentence-transformers

Then you can load this model and run inference.

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("ronit01/rag_tuned_minilm")
# Run inference
sentences = [
    "How does RapidFire AI's adaptive execution engine differ from traditional sequential execution for multi-config experiments?",
    'The crux of RapidFire AI\'s difference is in its *adaptive execution engine*: it enables "interruptible"\nexecution of configurations across GPUs/CPUs. To do so, it first shards the training and/or evaluation \ndataset randomly into "chunks" (also called "shards").\nThen instead of waiting for a run to see the whole dataset for all epochs (for SFT/RFT) or for full \neval metrics calculation (for RAG evals), RapidFire AI schedules all runs on *one shard at a time*, \nand then cycles through all shards.\n\nSuppose you have only 1 GPU, say an A100 or H100, and you want to run SFT on a Llama model. \nCurrent tools force you to run one config after another *sequentially* as shown in the (simplified) illustration below. \nIn contrast, by operating on shards, RapidFire AI offers a far more concurrent learning experience by \nautomatically *swapping* adapters (and base models, if needed) across GPU(s) and DRAM. \nIt does this via efficient shared memory-based caching mechanisms that can spill to disk when needed.\n\n.. image:: /images/gantt-1gpu.png\n   :width: 800px\n\nIn the above figure, all 3 model configs are shown for 1 epoch. RapidFire AI is set to use 4 chunks.\nSo, before model config 3 (M3) even starts in the sequential approach, RapidFire AI already shows you \nthe learning behaviors of all 3 configs on the first 2-3 chunks. \nThe overhead of swapping, represented by the thin gray box, is minimal, less than 5% of the runtime,\nas per our measurements--thanks to our new efficient memory management techniques.\n\nFor inference evals for RAG/context engineering, such sharded execution means RapidFire AI surfaces eval metrics \nsooner based on a statistical technique known as *online aggregation* from the database systems literature.\nBasically, see estimated values and confidence intervals for all eval metrics in real time as the shards \nget processed, ultimately converging to the exact metrics on the full dataset.',
    'We currently support two common knob set generators: :func:`List()` for a discrete \nset of values and :func:`Range()` for sampling from a continuous value interval.\n\n\n.. py:function:: List(values: List[Any])\n\n\t:param values: List of discrete values for a knob; all values must be the same python data type.\n\t:type values: List[Any]\n\n\n.. py:function:: Range(start: int | float, end: int | float, dtype: str = "int" | "float")\n\n\t:param start: Lower bound of range interval.\n\t:type start: int | float\n\n\t:param end: Upper bound of range interval.\n\t:type end: int | float\n\n\t:param dtype: Data type of value to be sampled, either :code:`"int"` or :code:`"float"`.\n\t:type dtype: str\n\n\n**Notes:**\n\nAs of this writing, :func:`Range()` performs uniform sampling within the given interval. \nWe plan to continue expanding this API and add more functionality on this front based on feedback.',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 384]

# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities)
# tensor([[1.0000, 0.7594, 0.3727],
#         [0.7594, 1.0000, 0.2782],
#         [0.3727, 0.2782, 1.0000]])

Training Details

Training Dataset

Unnamed Dataset

  • Size: 208 training samples

  • Columns: sentence_0, sentence_1, and label

  • Approximate statistics based on the first 208 samples:

    sentence_0 sentence_1 label
    type string string float
    details
    • min: 11 tokens
    • mean: 24.87 tokens
    • max: 34 tokens
    • min: 31 tokens
    • mean: 218.51 tokens
    • max: 256 tokens
    • min: 0.0
    • mean: 0.25
    • max: 1.0
  • Samples:

    sentence_0 sentence_1 label
    What is the difference between distributive and algebraic metrics in RapidFire AI's online aggregation for evals? Note that if you plan to use only OpenAI APIs and not self-hosted models (for embedding or generation), you do NOT need GPUs on your machine.
    But you must provide a valid OpenAI API key via a config argument as shown in the GSM8K and SciFact tutorial notebooks.

    Step 1: Install dependencies and package

    Obtain the RapidFire AI OSS package from pypi (includes all dependencies) and ensure it is installed correctly.

    .. important::

    Requires Python 3.12+. Ensure that python3 resolves to Python 3.12 before creating the venv.

    .. code-block:: bash

    python3 --version # must be 3.12.x python3 -m venv .venv source .venv/bin/activate

    pip install rapidfireai

    rapidfireai --version

    Verify it prints the following:

    RapidFire AI 0..14.0

    Due to current issue: https://github.com/huggingface/xet-core/issues/527

    pip uninstall -y hf-xet

    The tutorial notebooks for RAG evals do not use any gated models from Hugging Face. If you want to a... | 0.0 | | What is a 'leaf config' in RapidFire AI terminology, and how does it relate to runs? | Note that if you plan to use only OpenAI APIs and not self-hosted models (for embedding or generation), you do NOT need GPUs on your machine. But you must provide a valid OpenAI API key via a config argument as shown in the GSM8K and SciFact tutorial notebooks.

    Step 1: Install dependencies and package

    Obtain the RapidFire AI OSS package from pypi (includes all dependencies) and ensure it is installed correctly.

    .. important::

    Requires Python 3.12+. Ensure that python3 resolves to Python 3.12 before creating the venv.

    .. code-block:: bash

    python3 --version # must be 3.12.x python3 -m venv .venv source .venv/bin/activate

    pip install rapidfireai

    rapidfireai --version

    Verify it prints the following:

    RapidFire AI 0..14.0

    Due to current issue: https://github.com/huggingface/xet-core/issues/527

    pip uninstall -y hf-xet

    The tutorial notebooks for RAG evals do not use any gated models from Hugging Face. If you want to a... | 0.0 | | What training-specific arguments can you configure in RFSFTConfig, and how does it relate to HuggingFace TRL? | This use case notebook features an hybrid workflow spanning a self-hosted open LLM for embeddings and an Open AI call for generation.

    Task, Dataset, and Prompt

    This tutorial shows few-shot prompting as part of context engineering for solving grade school math word problems.

    It uses the "GSM8K" dataset; see its details here <https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai/gsm8k>__. The dataset contains grade school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning.

    The prompt format includes system instructions defining the assistant as a math problem solver, semantically selected few-shot examples, and the target question to solve.

    Model, Few-Shot Selection, and Configuration Knobs

    We compare 2 generator models via OpenAI API: gpt-5-mini and gpt-4o.

    There are 2 different reasoning effort levels for the first model only: medium and high.

    The few-shot prompting pipeline uses:

    • Example Selection: Semantic similarity-based selection using sentence-transformers/... | 0.0 |
  • Loss: ContrastiveLoss with these parameters:

    {
        "distance_metric": "SiameseDistanceMetric.COSINE_DISTANCE",
        "margin": 0.5,
        "size_average": true
    }
    

Training Hyperparameters

Non-Default Hyperparameters

  • per_device_train_batch_size: 16
  • per_device_eval_batch_size: 16
  • num_train_epochs: 1
  • multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin

All Hyperparameters

Click to expand
  • do_predict: False
  • prediction_loss_only: True
  • per_device_train_batch_size: 16
  • per_device_eval_batch_size: 16
  • gradient_accumulation_steps: 1
  • eval_accumulation_steps: None
  • torch_empty_cache_steps: None
  • learning_rate: 5e-05
  • weight_decay: 0.0
  • adam_beta1: 0.9
  • adam_beta2: 0.999
  • adam_epsilon: 1e-08
  • max_grad_norm: 1
  • num_train_epochs: 1
  • max_steps: -1
  • lr_scheduler_type: linear
  • lr_scheduler_kwargs: None
  • warmup_ratio: None
  • warmup_steps: 0
  • log_level: passive
  • log_level_replica: warning
  • log_on_each_node: True
  • logging_nan_inf_filter: True
  • enable_jit_checkpoint: False
  • save_on_each_node: False
  • save_only_model: False
  • restore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: False
  • use_cpu: False
  • seed: 42
  • data_seed: None
  • bf16: False
  • fp16: False
  • bf16_full_eval: False
  • fp16_full_eval: False
  • tf32: None
  • local_rank: -1
  • ddp_backend: None
  • debug: []
  • dataloader_drop_last: False
  • dataloader_num_workers: 0
  • dataloader_prefetch_factor: None
  • disable_tqdm: False
  • remove_unused_columns: True
  • label_names: None
  • load_best_model_at_end: False
  • ignore_data_skip: False
  • fsdp: []
  • fsdp_config: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}
  • accelerator_config: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}
  • parallelism_config: None
  • deepspeed: None
  • label_smoothing_factor: 0.0
  • optim: adamw_torch_fused
  • optim_args: None
  • group_by_length: False
  • length_column_name: length
  • project: huggingface
  • trackio_space_id: trackio
  • ddp_find_unused_parameters: None
  • ddp_bucket_cap_mb: None
  • ddp_broadcast_buffers: False
  • dataloader_pin_memory: True
  • dataloader_persistent_workers: False
  • skip_memory_metrics: True
  • push_to_hub: False
  • resume_from_checkpoint: None
  • hub_model_id: None
  • hub_strategy: every_save
  • hub_private_repo: None
  • hub_always_push: False
  • hub_revision: None
  • gradient_checkpointing: False
  • gradient_checkpointing_kwargs: None
  • include_for_metrics: []
  • eval_do_concat_batches: True
  • auto_find_batch_size: False
  • full_determinism: False
  • ddp_timeout: 1800
  • torch_compile: False
  • torch_compile_backend: None
  • torch_compile_mode: None
  • include_num_input_tokens_seen: no
  • neftune_noise_alpha: None
  • optim_target_modules: None
  • batch_eval_metrics: False
  • eval_on_start: False
  • use_liger_kernel: False
  • liger_kernel_config: None
  • eval_use_gather_object: False
  • average_tokens_across_devices: True
  • use_cache: False
  • prompts: None
  • batch_sampler: batch_sampler
  • multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin
  • router_mapping: {}
  • learning_rate_mapping: {}

Training Time

  • Training: 2.6 seconds

Framework Versions

  • Python: 3.12.13
  • Sentence Transformers: 5.4.1
  • Transformers: 5.0.0
  • PyTorch: 2.10.0+cu128
  • Accelerate: 1.13.0
  • Datasets: 4.0.0
  • Tokenizers: 0.22.2

Citation

BibTeX

Sentence Transformers

@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
    title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
    author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
    month = "11",
    year = "2019",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}

ContrastiveLoss

@inproceedings{hadsell2006dimensionality,
    author={Hadsell, R. and Chopra, S. and LeCun, Y.},
    booktitle={2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06)},
    title={Dimensionality Reduction by Learning an Invariant Mapping},
    year={2006},
    volume={2},
    number={},
    pages={1735-1742},
    doi={10.1109/CVPR.2006.100}
}