samadpls commited on
Commit
00d01cc
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d8a2928

Point to the Qwen3-8B fine-tune in the results

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +5 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -104,12 +104,12 @@ We asked 260 forum questions from 2025-01-01 to 2026-10-08 to four setups. Claud
104
 
105
  **What the results show**
106
 
107
- - **Far fewer wrong answers.** 27% of torchlight's answers were graded 1 (wrong), against 39% for the base model: 71 against 102. That gap is real, not chance (p = 0.003).
108
- - **Better than giving the base model forum search.** torchlight averages 1.97 against 1.75 (95% interval +0.09 to +0.35). Search pulled the small base model off topic: on the 23 questions where it searched, it averaged 1.35.
109
  - **Short and fast.** The median answer is 31 tokens, against 690 for the base model, and it answered all 260 questions in 9 minutes, against 32.
110
- - **The test is hard by design.** The questions are real forum posts from 2025 and 2026, after the model's knowledge ends, and a 4 or 5 needs the same fix that solved the thread. Every small setup gets a 4 or 5 on only 5–7% of questions. torchlight raises the average grade from 1.88 to 1.97 and good answers from 14 to 19, but those gaps are too small to be sure of.
111
- - **torchlight never uses the search tool.** None of its training chats included tools, so adding search changes nothing.
112
- - **A bigger or newer base model would likely do better.** Fine-tuning taught the model the forum's style, but what it knows is limited by its size (3.8B parameters) and by data that ends in mid-2024. The same training on a larger or more recent model is the next step. We haven't tested it yet.
113
 
114
  <details>
115
  <summary><b>How the test works</b></summary>
 
104
 
105
  **What the results show**
106
 
107
+ - **Far fewer wrong answers.** 27% of torchlight-phi4-mini's answers were graded 1 (wrong), against 39% for the base model: 71 against 102. That gap is real, not chance (p = 0.003).
108
+ - **Better than giving the base model forum search.** torchlight-phi4-mini averages 1.97 against 1.75 (95% interval +0.09 to +0.35). Search pulled the small base model off topic: on the 23 questions where it searched, it averaged 1.35.
109
  - **Short and fast.** The median answer is 31 tokens, against 690 for the base model, and it answered all 260 questions in 9 minutes, against 32.
110
+ - **The test is hard by design.** The questions are real forum posts from 2025 and 2026, after the model's knowledge ends, and a 4 or 5 needs the same fix that solved the thread. Every small setup gets a 4 or 5 on only 5–7% of questions. torchlight-phi4-mini raises the average grade from 1.88 to 1.97 and good answers from 14 to 19, but those gaps are too small to be sure of.
111
+ - **torchlight-phi4-mini never uses the search tool.** None of its training chats included tools, so adding search changes nothing.
112
+ - **A bigger model helps.** The same training on Qwen3-8B (8.2B parameters) scored higher on the newest questions. See [`torchlight-qwen3-8b`](https://huggingface.co/samadpls/torchlight-qwen3-8b).
113
 
114
  <details>
115
  <summary><b>How the test works</b></summary>