Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
datasets:
|
| 3 |
+
- samirmsallem/argument_mining_de
|
| 4 |
+
language:
|
| 5 |
+
- de
|
| 6 |
+
metrics:
|
| 7 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 8 |
+
base_model:
|
| 9 |
+
- deepset/gbert-base
|
| 10 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
| 11 |
+
library_name: transformers
|
| 12 |
+
model-index:
|
| 13 |
+
- name: checkpoints
|
| 14 |
+
results:
|
| 15 |
+
- task:
|
| 16 |
+
name: Text Classification
|
| 17 |
+
type: text-classification
|
| 18 |
+
dataset:
|
| 19 |
+
name: samirmsallem/argument_mining_de
|
| 20 |
+
type: samirmsallem/argument_mining_de
|
| 21 |
+
metrics:
|
| 22 |
+
- name: Accuracy
|
| 23 |
+
type: accuracy
|
| 24 |
+
value: 0.9657534246575342
|
| 25 |
+
---
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## Text classification model for argument mining and detection
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
**gbert-base-argument_mining** is a text classification model in the scientific domain in German, finetuned from the model [gbert-base](https://huggingface.co/deepset/gbert-base).
|
| 31 |
+
It was trained using a [synthetically created, annotated dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/samirmsallem/argument_mining_de) containing different sentence types occuring in conclusions of scientific theses and papers.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
### Training
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Training was conducted on a 10 epoch fine-tuning approach, however this repository contains the results of the second epoch, since it has the best accuracy:
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
| epoch | accuracy | loss |
|
| 39 |
+
|-------|-------------------|--------------------|
|
| 40 |
+
| 1.0 | 0.9315 | 0.3872 |
|
| 41 |
+
| 2.0 | 0.9178 | 0.2987 |
|
| 42 |
+
| 3.0 | 0.9589 | 0.1519 |
|
| 43 |
+
| 4.0 | **0.9658** | **0.1162** |
|
| 44 |
+
| 5.0 | 0.9521 | 0.2100 |
|
| 45 |
+
| 6.0 | 0.9521 | 0.1979 |
|
| 46 |
+
| 7.0 | 0.9521 | 0.2453 |
|
| 47 |
+
| 8.0 | 0.9521 | 0.2251 |
|
| 48 |
+
| 9.0 | 0.9452 | 0.2225 |
|
| 49 |
+
| 10.0 | 0.9521 | 0.2286 |
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
In relation to the dataset, the model demonstrates that it can effectively learn to distinguish between the two classes claim and premise. However, the rapid onset of overfitting after epoch 2 suggests that the dataset is imbalanced and noisy. Further work should enable the model to be trained on more robust data to ensure better evaluation results.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
### Text Classification Tags
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
|Text Classification Tag| Text Classification Label |
|
| 58 |
+
| :----: | :----: |
|
| 59 |
+
| 0 | CLAIM |
|
| 60 |
+
| 1 | COUNTERCLAIM |
|
| 61 |
+
| 2 | LINK |
|
| 62 |
+
| 3 | CONC |
|
| 63 |
+
| 4 | FUT |
|
| 64 |
+
| 5 | OTH |
|