Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,58 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: mit
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
---
|
| 6 |
+
This is a BERT model trained on the U.S. Comparative Agendas Project (CAP) dataset, annotated with a top-level taxonomy covering 20 policy areas, as well as an "Others" category for non-policy-related text. The model is designed to identify policy and non-policy issues in political discourse.
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
The performance of the model on an unseen test set is as follows:
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
This is a BERT model trained on the US Comparative Agendas Project dataset for the U.S. with annotations for the top level taxonomy covering 20 policy areas and Others for non-policy related text.
|
| 11 |
+
The model can be used to identify policy (non-policy)issues political discourse.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## Model performance
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
The model performance on unseen test set is as follows:
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
| Label | F1 score |
|
| 20 |
+
|:----------------------|-----------:|
|
| 21 |
+
| Macroeconomics | 0.8303 |
|
| 22 |
+
| Civil rights | 0.7676 |
|
| 23 |
+
| Health | 0.8886 |
|
| 24 |
+
| Agriculture | 0.8439 |
|
| 25 |
+
| Labor | 0.7818 |
|
| 26 |
+
| Education | 0.9005 |
|
| 27 |
+
| Environment | 0.8481 |
|
| 28 |
+
| Energy | 0.8629 |
|
| 29 |
+
| Immigration | 0.8682 |
|
| 30 |
+
| Transportation | 0.8731 |
|
| 31 |
+
| Law and crime | 0.8207 |
|
| 32 |
+
| Social welfare | 0.7957 |
|
| 33 |
+
| Housing | 0.8462 |
|
| 34 |
+
| Domestic commerce | 0.8421 |
|
| 35 |
+
| Defense | 0.8627 |
|
| 36 |
+
| Technology | 0.8333 |
|
| 37 |
+
| Foreign trade | 0.8269 |
|
| 38 |
+
| International affairs | 0.8907 |
|
| 39 |
+
| Government operations | 0.8777 |
|
| 40 |
+
| Public lands | 0.8758 |
|
| 41 |
+
| Others | 0.6543 |
|
| 42 |
+
| **Macro average** | **0.8573** |
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
</div>
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
This model was trained specifically for additional analyses presented in this [paper](https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.07323).
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Citation
|
| 50 |
+
If you find this model useful for your work, please consider citing:
|
| 51 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 52 |
+
@article{aroyehun2024computational,
|
| 53 |
+
title={Computational analysis of US Congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition},
|
| 54 |
+
author={Aroyehun, Segun Taofeek and Simchon, Almog and Carrella, Fabio and Lasser, Jana and Lewandowsky, Stephan and Garcia, David},
|
| 55 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07323},
|
| 56 |
+
year={2024}
|
| 57 |
+
}
|
| 58 |
+
```
|