code/finetune-inference/old/completeness_reasoning_v1.py

import os
os.environ["CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER"] = "PCI_BUS_ID"
os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] = "4"
import torch
from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
import json

# ===========================
# GPU SETTINGS
# ===========================


# ===========================
# MODEL LOADING (CACHED)
# ===========================
_model_cache = {"model": None, "tokenizer": None}

def load_finetuned_model(model_path: str):
    """Load and cache the fine-tuned model + tokenizer."""
    if _model_cache["model"] is not None:
        return _model_cache["model"], _model_cache["tokenizer"]

    model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained(
        model_name=model_path,
        max_seq_length=4096,
        load_in_4bit=False,
        load_in_8bit=False,
        full_finetuning=False,
    )
    _model_cache["model"], _model_cache["tokenizer"] = model, tokenizer
    return model, tokenizer


# ===========================
# INFERENCE FUNCTION
# ===========================
def infer_reasonableness(
    reference_summary: str,
    generated_summary: str,
    readability_level: str,
    subclaim_text: str,
    result: int,
    model_path: str = "/home/mshahidul/readctrl_model/qwen3-32B_subclaims-completeness_resonability_check_v2",
):
    """
    Given the reference summary, generated summary, readability level, subclaim, and its result (0/1),
    predict reasonableness: reasonable / partially_reasonable / unreasonable, plus justification.
    """
    model, tokenizer = load_finetuned_model(model_path)

    # ---- Build inference prompt (same structure as training) ----
    prompt = f"""
You are an impartial medical summarization evaluator.

Goal:
Decide whether the inclusion or omission of ONE specific subclaim from the reference summary is *reasonable*, given the readability level of the generated summary.

Readability Criteria:
- Easy: for non-medical readers; emphasize main story and outcomes; omit numerical data, anatomy, and test details.
- Intermediate: for general educated readers; keep main findings but simplify phrasing.
- Hard: for clinical or technical readers; maintain diagnostic accuracy and essential quantitative or anatomic content.

Judging rules:
* Base your decision strictly on what appears in the generated summary.
* If result = 0 (subclaim omitted) and the omitted detail is clearly technical or numerical for the given level, choose "reasonable".
* If result = 0 and the subclaim is essential to the main story, choose "unreasonable".
* Stay consistent between `result`, justification, and readability level.

### Inputs
Readability Level: {readability_level}
Reference Summary: {reference_summary}
Generated Summary: {generated_summary}
Subclaim: "{subclaim_text}"
Result: {result}   # 1 = supported (included), 0 = omitted

### Task
Respond **only** with the following JSON object:

{{
  "reasonableness": "<reasonable | partially_reasonable | unreasonable>",
  "justification": "<short clear explanation>"
}}
""".strip()

    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt + "\n"}]

    chat_text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages,
        tokenize=False,
        add_generation_prompt=True,
        enable_thinking=False,  # important for Unsloth chat template
    )

    inputs = tokenizer(chat_text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

    # ---- Generate output ----
    with torch.no_grad():
        output_ids = model.generate(
            **inputs,
            max_new_tokens=150,
            temperature=0.2,
            top_p=0.8,
            top_k=5,
            do_sample=False,
        )

    output_text = tokenizer.decode(output_ids[0], skip_special_tokens=True).strip()
    output_text = output_text.split("</think>")[1].strip()
    # ---- Extract model JSON output ----
    try:
        parsed = json.loads(output_text)
    except Exception:
        # print("Failed to parse JSON from model output. Returning raw text.\n\n")
        parsed = output_text
    return parsed


# ===========================
# EXAMPLE USAGE
# ===========================
if __name__ == "__main__":
    # reference_summary = "Una niña nacida a las 34 semanas de gestación precisó intubación..."
    # generated_summary = "Esta es la historia de una niña que nació antes de tiempo, a las 34 semanas..."
    # subclaim_text = "La paciente presentaba hiperinsulinismo en el período neonatal."
    # readability_level = "easy"
    # result = 0  # omitted
    import json
    with open('/home/mshahidul/readctrl/data/testing_data_gs/multiclinsum_gs_train_es.json', 'r') as f:
        multiclinsum_gs_train_es_data = json.load(f)
    ref_summaries={}
    fulltexts={}
    for item in multiclinsum_gs_train_es_data:
        ref_summaries[item['id']]=item['summary']
        fulltexts[item['id']]=item['fulltext']
    
    generated_summaries = {}
    with open('/home/mshahidul/readctrl/data/hand_create_gpt5_other_model/synthetic_data_es_raw_592.json', 'r') as f:
        synthetic_data_es_raw_592 = json.load(f)
    for item in synthetic_data_es_raw_592:
        for version in ['easy', 'intermediate', 'hard']:
            generated_summaries[(item['id'], version)] = item['readability_versions'][version]['text']
    # /home/mshahidul/readctrl/results/dataset_quality_check/subclaim_verifier_results_100_qwen3-32B.json
    with open("/home/mshahidul/readctrl/results/dataset_quality_check/subclaim_verifier_results_100_qwen3-32B.json", 'r') as f:
        qwen3_32B_results = json.load(f)
    full_res = []
    save_path = "/home/mshahidul/readctrl/results/dataset_quality_check/completeness_resonability_check_100_qwen3-32B_v3.json"
    import tqdm
    for idx, item in tqdm.tqdm(enumerate(qwen3_32B_results)):
        print(f"Processing item {idx + 1}/{len(qwen3_32B_results)}")
        reference_summary = ref_summaries[item['id']]
        fulltext = fulltexts[item['id']]
        generated_summary = generated_summaries[(item['id'], item['version'])]
        temp_res = []
        for item2 in item['completeness']['results']:
            subclaim_text = item2['subclaim']['subclaim']
            result = item2['result']
            if result =="1":
                continue
            response = infer_reasonableness(
                reference_summary,
                generated_summary,
                item['version'],
                subclaim_text,
                result,
                model_path="/home/mshahidul/readctrl_model/qwen3-32B_subclaims-completeness_resonability_check",
            )
            temp_res.append({
                'id':item2['subclaim']['id'],
                "subclaim": subclaim_text,
                "result": result,
                "reasonableness": response
            })
        full_res.append({
            "id": item['id'],
            "version": item['version'],
            "completeness": {
                "results": temp_res
            }
        })
        if len(full_res)%10==0:
            with open(save_path, 'w') as f:
                json.dump(full_res, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)

with open(save_path, 'w') as f:
   json.dump(full_res, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)