| | import json |
| | import sys |
| | from openai import OpenAI |
| | import ast,os |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | MODEL_NAME = "/home/mshahidul/readctrl_model/full_model/qwen3-32B_subclaims-completeness_resonability_check_8kCtx_v3_BF16_merged" |
| | VLLM_API_URL = "http://localhost:8004/v1" |
| | VLLM_API_KEY = "EMPTY" |
| |
|
| | |
| | client = OpenAI( |
| | base_url=VLLM_API_URL, |
| | api_key=VLLM_API_KEY, |
| | ) |
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | def infer_reasonableness( |
| | reference_summary: str, |
| | generated_summary: str, |
| | readability_level: str, |
| | subclaim_text: str, |
| | result: int, |
| | ): |
| | """ |
| | Predict reasonableness using the local vLLM server. |
| | No error handling: validation or connection errors will raise exceptions. |
| | """ |
| |
|
| | |
| | prompt = f""" |
| | You are an impartial medical summarization evaluator. |
| | |
| | Goal: |
| | Decide whether the inclusion or omission of ONE specific subclaim from the reference summary is *reasonable*, given the readability level of the generated summary. |
| | |
| | Readability Criteria: |
| | - Easy: for non-medical readers; emphasize main story and outcomes; omit numerical data, anatomy, and test details. |
| | - Intermediate: for general educated readers; keep main findings but simplify phrasing. |
| | - Hard: for clinical or technical readers; maintain diagnostic accuracy and essential quantitative or anatomic content. |
| | |
| | Judging rules: |
| | * Base your decision strictly on what appears in the generated summary. |
| | * If result = 0 (subclaim omitted) and the omitted detail is clearly technical or numerical for the given level, choose "reasonable". |
| | * If result = 0 and the subclaim is essential to the main story, choose "unreasonable". |
| | * Stay consistent between `result`, justification, and readability level. |
| | |
| | ### Inputs |
| | Readability Level: {readability_level} |
| | Reference Summary: {reference_summary} |
| | Generated Summary: {generated_summary} |
| | Subclaim: "{subclaim_text}" |
| | Result: {result} # 1 = supported (included), 0 = omitted |
| | |
| | ### Task |
| | Respond **only** with the following JSON object: |
| | |
| | {{ |
| | "reasonableness": "<reasonable | partially_reasonable | unreasonable>", |
| | "justification": "<short clear explanation>" |
| | }} |
| | """.strip() |
| |
|
| | messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}] |
| |
|
| | |
| | response = client.chat.completions.create( |
| | model=MODEL_NAME, |
| | messages=messages, |
| | temperature=0.2, |
| | max_tokens=200, |
| | top_p=0.8, |
| | ) |
| |
|
| | output_text = response.choices[0].message.content |
| |
|
| | |
| | try: |
| | if "</think>" in output_text: |
| | output_text = output_text.split("</think>")[1] |
| | |
| | clean_text = output_text.strip().replace("```json", "").replace("```", "").strip() |
| | |
| | t=ast.literal_eval(clean_text) |
| |
|
| | |
| | return t |
| | except Exception as e: |
| | return output_text |
| |
|
| |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | if __name__ == "__main__": |
| | import argparse |
| | parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() |
| | parser.add_argument("--data_path", type=str, required=True, |
| | help="Path to the JSON file containing evaluation data.") |
| | args = parser.parse_args() |
| | data_path = args.data_path |
| | |
| | file_name=os.path.basename(data_path) |
| | |
| | |
| | with open(data_path, 'r') as f: |
| | dataset = json.load(f) |
| | |
| | |
| | save_path = f'/home/mshahidul/readctrl/data/completeness_resoning_result/{file_name}' |
| | full_results = [] |
| | if os.path.exists(save_path): |
| | with open(save_path, 'r') as f: |
| | full_results = json.load(f) |
| |
|
| | import tqdm |
| | for item in tqdm.tqdm(dataset): |
| | if any(d['id'] == item['id'] for d in full_results): |
| | continue |
| | reference_summary = item['summary'] |
| | temp2={} |
| | for label in ['easy', 'intermediate', 'hard']: |
| | generated_summary = item[f'{label}_text'] |
| | subclaim_list = item['metrics'][f'{label}']['completeness']['details'] |
| | temp=[] |
| | for idx, subclaim in enumerate(subclaim_list): |
| | |
| | |
| | result = 1 if subclaim['label'] == 'supported' else 0 |
| | |
| | if result ==0: |
| | output = infer_reasonableness( |
| | reference_summary=reference_summary, |
| | generated_summary=generated_summary, |
| | readability_level=label, |
| | subclaim_text=subclaim['subclaim'], |
| | result=result, |
| | ) |
| | |
| | temp.append({ |
| | 'subclaim': subclaim['subclaim'], |
| | 'output': output |
| | }) |
| | else: |
| | temp.append({ |
| | 'subclaim': subclaim['subclaim'], |
| | 'output': { |
| | 'reasonableness': 'reasonable', |
| | 'justification': 'The subclaim is included in the generated summary, hence it is reasonable.' |
| | } |
| | }) |
| |
|
| | temp2[label] = { |
| | 'results': temp |
| | } |
| | full_results.append({ |
| | 'id': item['id'], |
| | 'completeness': temp2 |
| | }) |
| | if len(full_results) % 10 == 0: |
| | with open(save_path, 'w') as f: |
| | json.dump(full_results, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False) |
| |
|
| | with open(save_path, 'w') as f: |
| | json.dump(full_results, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False) |
| |
|
| | |
| | |