--- license: other license_name: actionman-research-preview license_link: LICENSE library_name: pytorch base_model: answerdotai/ModernBERT-large tags: - action-model - function-calling - tool-calling - tool-use - non-autoregressive - masked-diffusion - modernbert datasets: - Salesforce/xlam-function-calling-60k - Team-ACE/ToolACE - NousResearch/hermes-function-calling-v1 ---

Decision models choose. Action models act.
ActionMan-0.1 is an action model: a 0.4B encoder that selects the tool in one forward pass and writes every argument with masked diffusion. It finishes in 2-3 forward passes, with no autoregressive decoding and no JSON generated. | One tool call, median, batch 1 | latency | |---|---| | **ActionMan-0.1** (RTX 4090) | **17 ms** | | Qwen3-0.6B fine-tuned on the same data (vLLM, tuned, same GPU) | 122 ms | | GPT-6 Luna (API, network included) | 1,455 ms | In the time GPT-6 Luna returns one call, ActionMan returns 85. ## Inside  1. **Encode.** ModernBERT-large (28 layers, 395M weights) encodes the tool signatures, the instruction and up to four `[CALL]` markers once. The context is cached. 2. **Select tool.** Each `[CALL]` scores every tool, or none. A length head sizes the slots for every argument. 3. **[MASK] slots.** One block of masked slots is appended, covering every argument. 4. **Denoise.** All slots are predicted in parallel: - values that appear in the instruction are copied as spans; - enums and booleans are picked from their options; - lists get a count head and item slots. 5. **Re-mask < 0.85, denoise.** Low-confidence slots are re-masked and predicted again. The passes run as CUDA graphs. A language model runs its full stack once per output token. The same call takes about 80 forward passes. ## Speed  Latency is flat in the size of the answer: | | 1 call | 3+ calls | |---|---|---| | ActionMan-0.1 | 16.8 ms | 21.0 ms | | Qwen3-0.6B, vLLM | 111 ms | 331 ms | On a server CPU (8 threads), ActionMan fp32 takes 0.45 s and llama.cpp Q8_0 takes 1.66 s. ## The Arena  Three real-time games played only through tool calls, where thinking time is charged to the model. | Wins out of 12 | ActionMan-0.1 | Qwen3-0.6B, same data | GPT-6 Luna | |---|---|---|---| | 2D Minecraft | **10** | 9 | 10 | | Rally | **11** | 9 | 3 | | Cycling | **11** | 3 | 3 | ## Accuracy | BFCL v4, official harness | size | Non-Live | Live | Irrelevance | |---|---|---|---|---| | **ActionMan-0.1** | 0.4B | 66.0 | 45.1 | **81.2** | | Hammer2.1-0.5b | 0.49B | 65.9 | 54.7 | 80.7 | | granite-4.0-350m | 0.35B | 67.7 | 46.7 | 61.1 | | Qwen3-0.6B (FC) | 0.75B | 72.9 | 58.8 | 80.9 | | Qwen3-0.6B fine-tuned on the same data | 0.75B | 75.7 | 54.1 | 79.1 | | Qwen3-1.7B (FC) | 2.0B | 82.7 | 74.7 | 76.8 | | GPT-6 Luna (API, reasoning low) | - | 78.2 | 68.8 | 75.6 | - **The run:** every model ran with `bfcl-eval==2026.3.23` on one box, single-turn categories only. - **Full report:** per-category scores, confidence intervals and error classes are in [benchmark.md](https://github.com/shing1Sks/ActionMan/blob/main/docs/results/benchmark.md). ## Usage ```bash pip install "git+https://github.com/shing1Sks/ActionMan" # torch, transformers>=5, safetensors, huggingface_hub ``` ```python from actionman.api import ActionMan am = ActionMan.from_pretrained("shing-dev/ActionMan-0.1") # compiles on GPU (one-off warm-up) tools = [{"type": "function", "function": { "name": "get_weather", "description": "Current weather for a city", "parameters": {"type": "object", "properties": { "city": {"type": "string"}, "unit": {"type": "string", "enum": ["celsius", "fahrenheit"]}}, "required": ["city"]}}}] am.predict("What's the weather in Paris in celsius?", tools) # [{"name": "get_weather", "arguments": {"city": "Paris", "unit": "celsius"}, "confidence": 0.9812}] am.predict("Tell me a joke", tools) # [] ``` - **Without pip:** the inference code is also in this repo under `code/actionman/`. Add `code/` to `sys.path`. - **No call:** `[]` means no tool fits. `require=True` forces a call, like `tool_choice="required"`. - **`confidence`** is the minimum over the tool and every argument. Abstaining below a threshold works well: skipping the 10% least confident calls takes accuracy on our 2,340-prompt eval from 78.6 to 85.1. - **Specs:** - single turn, English; - up to 4 calls per request; - lists of up to 7 items; - an input of about 896 tokens. ## Training - **Data:** 5 epochs over 80,459 rows: - xLAM-60k, 58,000; - ToolACE, 10,359; - Hermes v1, 1,100; - no-call examples, 11,000. - **Hardware:** one RTX 4090, about 2 hours. ## Licence - **The weights are for research use only.** The training data includes Salesforce's xLAM-60k, whose card says "This release is for research purposes only." - **ToolACE and Hermes** are Apache-2.0. - **The inference code** is MIT. ## Links - **Code, benchmarks, the Arena:** [github.com/shing1Sks/ActionMan](https://github.com/shing1Sks/ActionMan) - **The launch film:** [actionman-launch-film.mp4](https://github.com/shing1Sks/ActionMan/releases/download/v0.1/actionman-launch-film.mp4) Research by Shreyash Kumar Singh with an AI coding agent (Claude).