Adding model card for specter2-review-method
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,199 +1,120 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
# Model
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 22 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 23 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 24 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 26 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
### Direct Use
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
## Training Details
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
### Training Data
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
- **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
#### Metrics
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 126 |
-
|
| 127 |
-
### Results
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 130 |
-
|
| 131 |
-
#### Summary
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 148 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 149 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 150 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 166 |
|
| 167 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
**BibTeX:**
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
**APA:**
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 184 |
-
|
| 185 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 188 |
-
|
| 189 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
| 190 |
-
|
| 191 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
-
## Model Card Authors
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
-
[
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
## Model Card Contact
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 3 |
+
metrics:
|
| 4 |
+
- f1
|
| 5 |
+
base_model:
|
| 6 |
+
- allenai/specter2_base
|
| 7 |
+
model-index:
|
| 8 |
+
- name: specter2-review-method
|
| 9 |
+
results:
|
| 10 |
+
- task:
|
| 11 |
+
type: text-classification
|
| 12 |
+
dataset:
|
| 13 |
+
name: validation
|
| 14 |
+
type: validation
|
| 15 |
+
metrics:
|
| 16 |
+
- name: macro-average F1-score
|
| 17 |
+
type: macro-average F1-score
|
| 18 |
+
value: 0.83
|
| 19 |
---
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
# Model: specter2-review-method
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
The model `snsf-data/specter2-review-method` is based on the `allenai/specter2_base` model and **fine-tuned for a binary classification** task.
|
| 24 |
+
In particular, the model is fine-tuned to classify if a sentence from SNSF grant peer review report is addressing the following aspect:
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
***Does the sentence address the methods to be used in the proposed research project?***
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
+
The model was fine-tuned based on a training set of 2'500 sentences from the SNSF grant peer review reports, which were manually annotated by multiple human annotators via majority rule.
|
| 29 |
+
The fine-tuning was performed locally without access to the internet to prevent any potential data leakage or network interference.
|
| 30 |
+
The following setup was used for the fine-tuning:
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+
- Loss function: cross-entropy loss
|
| 33 |
+
- Optimizer: AdamW
|
| 34 |
+
- Weight decay: 0.01
|
| 35 |
+
- Learning rate: 2e-5
|
| 36 |
+
- Epochs: 3
|
| 37 |
+
- Batch size: 10
|
| 38 |
+
- GPU: NVIDIA RTX A2000
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
The model was then evaluated based on a validation set of 500 sentences, which were also manually annotated by multiple human annotators via majority rule.
|
| 41 |
+
The resulting macro-average **F1 score: 0.83** was achieved on the validation set. The share of the outcome label amounts to 16.2%.
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
The fine-tuning codes are open-sourced on GitHub: https://github.com/snsf-data/ml-peer-review-analysis .
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
Due to data privacy laws no data used for the fine-tuning can be publicly shared.
|
| 46 |
+
For a detailed description of data protection please refer to the data management plan underlying this work: https://doi.org/10.46446/DMP-peer-review-assessment-ML.
|
| 47 |
+
The annotation codebook is available online: https://doi.org/10.46446/Codebook-peer-review-assessment-ML.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
For more details, see the the following preprint:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
**A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for Assessing Grant Peer Review Reports**
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
by [Gabriel Okasa](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-7227),
|
| 54 |
+
[Alberto de Le贸n](https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0401-2618),
|
| 55 |
+
[Michaela Strinzel](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3181-0623),
|
| 56 |
+
[Anne Jorstad](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-1979),
|
| 57 |
+
[Katrin Milzow](https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8959-2534),
|
| 58 |
+
[Matthias Egger](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7462-5132), and
|
| 59 |
+
[Stefan M眉ller](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-4125), available on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16662 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
The model can be used to classify sentences from grant peer review reports for addressing the methods used in the proposed project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
+
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
+
```python
|
| 68 |
+
# import transformers library
|
| 69 |
+
import transformers
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
+
# load tokenizer from specter2_base - the base model
|
| 72 |
+
tokenizer = transformers.AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("allenai/specter2_base")
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
# load the SNSF fine-tuned model for classification of methods comments in review texts
|
| 75 |
+
model = transformers.AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("snsf-data/specter2-review-method")
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
# setup the classification pipeline
|
| 78 |
+
classification_pipeline = transformers.TextClassificationPipeline(
|
| 79 |
+
model=model,
|
| 80 |
+
tokenizer=tokenizer,
|
| 81 |
+
return_all_scores=True
|
| 82 |
+
)
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
+
# prediction for an example review sentence addressing methods
|
| 85 |
+
classification_pipeline("The reduced-form methods suggested in the proposal seem to be the appropriate method for the proposed projects.")
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
+
# prediction for an example review sentence not addressing methods
|
| 88 |
+
classification_pipeline("There are currently several activities on an international level that have identified the issue and activities are underway.")
|
| 89 |
+
```
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
+
## Citation
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
**BibTeX:**
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 96 |
+
@article{okasa2024supervised,
|
| 97 |
+
title={A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for Assessing Grant Peer Review Reports},
|
| 98 |
+
author={Okasa, Gabriel and de Le{\'o}n, Alberto and Strinzel, Michaela and Jorstad, Anne and Milzow, Katrin and Egger, Matthias and M{\"u}ller, Stefan},
|
| 99 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16662},
|
| 100 |
+
year={2024}
|
| 101 |
+
}
|
| 102 |
+
```
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
**APA:**
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
+
Okasa, G., de Le贸n, A., Strinzel, M., Jorstad, A., Milzow, K., Egger, M., & M眉ller, S. (2024). A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for Assessing Grant Peer Review Reports. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16662.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
+
## Model Card Authors
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
+
[Gabriel Okasa](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-7227),
|
| 111 |
+
[Alberto de Le贸n](https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0401-2618),
|
| 112 |
+
[Michaela Strinzel](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3181-0623),
|
| 113 |
+
[Anne Jorstad](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-1979),
|
| 114 |
+
[Katrin Milzow](https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8959-2534),
|
| 115 |
+
[Matthias Egger](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7462-5132), and
|
| 116 |
+
[Stefan M眉ller](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-4125)
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
## Model Card Contact
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
+
gabriel.okasa@snf.ch
|