Spaces:
Running
Running
Update ARCHITECTURE.md
Browse files- ARCHITECTURE.md +62 -34
ARCHITECTURE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -7,65 +7,93 @@ AISA models agentic AI systems as composed systems in which behavior
|
|
| 7 |
emerges from the interaction between reasoning, execution,
|
| 8 |
infrastructure, evaluation, and governance.
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
---
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
##
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
---
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-
###
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
---
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
###
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
---
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-
###
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
---
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-
###
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
---
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
###
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
---
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
###
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
---
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
Defines system-wide constraints, oversight,
|
| 60 |
-
and accountability mechanisms.
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
-
|
| 68 |
-
- **System-Level Evaluation** of agent behavior
|
| 69 |
-
- **Governance by Design**
|
| 70 |
-
- **Implementation Independence**
|
| 71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
emerges from the interaction between reasoning, execution,
|
| 8 |
infrastructure, evaluation, and governance.
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+

|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
+
## Layer Responsibilities (Summary)
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
### Governance, Ethics & Policy Layer
|
| 17 |
+
- AI policies and transparency standards
|
| 18 |
+
- Fairness and bias mitigation
|
| 19 |
+
- Privacy and data protection
|
| 20 |
+
- Accountability frameworks and human-in-the-loop governance
|
| 21 |
+
- Regulatory compliance and ethical reflection
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
---
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
+
### Development & Deployment Layer
|
| 26 |
+
- Version control of agents and artifacts
|
| 27 |
+
- Continuous integration and deployment
|
| 28 |
+
- Performance benchmarking and A/B testing
|
| 29 |
+
- Cost–latency trade-off management
|
| 30 |
+
- Security, access control, and lifecycle tracking
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
---
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
### Evaluation & Feedback Layer
|
| 35 |
+
- Component-level evaluations
|
| 36 |
+
- Behavioral monitoring and quality metrics
|
| 37 |
+
- Error analysis and prioritization
|
| 38 |
+
- Human-in-the-loop evaluations
|
| 39 |
+
- Automated regression testing
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
---
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
### Agentic Infrastructure Layer
|
| 44 |
+
- Workflow orchestration and coordination
|
| 45 |
+
- Multi-agent communication patterns
|
| 46 |
+
- State coordination and observability
|
| 47 |
+
- Logging, monitoring, and dashboards
|
| 48 |
+
- Latency, cost optimization, and EvalOps pipelines
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
---
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
### Cognitive Agent Layer
|
| 53 |
+
- Task planning and decomposition
|
| 54 |
+
- Reflection loops and self-improvement
|
| 55 |
+
- Memory management
|
| 56 |
+
- Multi-turn reasoning and goal tracking
|
| 57 |
+
- Integration of external feedback
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
---
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
### Tool & Environment Layer
|
| 62 |
+
- Tool creation and structured syntax
|
| 63 |
+
- Code execution and sandboxing
|
| 64 |
+
- Safe function calling and MCP support
|
| 65 |
+
- Error handling and retries
|
| 66 |
+
- Permission, rate control, and structured I/O
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
---
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
### LLM Foundation Layer
|
| 71 |
+
- Tokenization and inference
|
| 72 |
+
- Prompt engineering and instruction tuning
|
| 73 |
+
- LLM APIs and adapters
|
| 74 |
+
- Context window optimization
|
| 75 |
+
- Fine-tuning, alignment, and safety grounding
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
---
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
+
## Architectural Principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
+

|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
**1. Separation of Concerns**
|
| 84 |
+
Clear separation between system responsibilities to prevent mixing reasoning, permissions, and orchestration logic.
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
**2. Assurance-by-Design**
|
| 87 |
+
Evaluation, monitoring, and governance are built into the architecture from the start, not added after deployment.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
**3. Dual-Plane Design**
|
| 90 |
+
A clear distinction between the data plane (runtime execution) and the control plane (policies, permissions, and budgets).
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
**4. Contract-Driven Interfaces**
|
| 93 |
+
Structured and machine-checkable interfaces reduce ambiguity and improve testing and auditability.
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
**5. Continuous Improvement Loop**
|
| 96 |
+
Agent behavior evolves continuously through feedback-driven updates to prompts, tools, and policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
+
**6. Practical Deployability**
|
| 99 |
+
The architecture accounts for real-world constraints such as cost, latency, observability, access control, and versioning.
|