{principle.title}
{principle.text}
import { motion } from 'framer-motion'; import { ShieldCheck, ScanSearch, BrainCircuit, Workflow, ChevronRight, AlertTriangle, Sparkles, BarChart3, Users, ArrowDown } from 'lucide-react'; import UploadZone from './UploadZone'; import styles from './LandingPage.module.css'; const problemCards = [ { icon: AlertTriangle, title: 'Metadata Is Fragile', text: 'Modern synthetic media can strip or spoof EXIF and provenance fields, making metadata-only screening unreliable in adversarial settings.', }, { icon: BrainCircuit, title: 'Black-Box Detectors Fail Trust', text: 'Many existing tools output a binary label without revealing why the model reached that conclusion, limiting evaluator confidence and auditability.', }, { icon: ScanSearch, title: 'Explainability Is Essential', text: 'UAIDE moves beyond opaque predictions with Grad-CAM-style localisation, frequency signals, and confidence reasoning for each forensic verdict.', }, ]; const pipeline = [ 'Data Preparation', 'Feature Fusion', 'EfficientNet B2 + FFT', 'Random Forest / XGBoost', 'Explainable Output', ]; const team = [ { name: 'Aadya', role: 'Research, Documentation and Backend', note: 'Research synthesis, technical documentation, and backend workflow support.' }, { name: 'Atherva', role: 'UI & UX ยท Literature Study', note: 'Interface strategy, evaluator flow, and research synthesis.' }, { name: 'Deshna', role: 'Model Training, System Integration and Analysis', note: 'Model training coordination, system integration, and end-to-end forensic analysis workflow.' }, { name: 'Ojas', role: 'System Design and Data Collection', note: 'System architecture planning, dataset curation, and structured data collection for experimentation.' }, ]; const principles = [ { title: 'Ethical Flagging', text: 'AI-generated faces and suspicious artefacts are surfaced with a conservative review-first posture for sensitive academic and investigative contexts.', }, { title: 'Transparency Through XAI', text: 'Heatmaps, frequency cues, and score breakdowns help evaluators understand where the detector found evidence instead of trusting a hidden model state.', }, { title: 'Bias Mitigation', text: 'K-Fold validation and multi-signal fusion reduce overfitting and encourage more stable decisions across varied image conditions and sources.', }, ]; export default function LandingPage({ onFileSelect, error }) { return (
A robust computer vision framework for detecting synthetic media and deepfakes via content-level analysis. Designed for academic evaluation, explainability, and accountable forensic review.
UAIDE addresses the research gap between raw classification performance and evaluator trust by combining content-level analysis with transparent evidence surfaces.
{text}
The system fuses spatial and frequency-domain evidence, then combines ensemble reasoning with explainable outputs to support academic scrutiny.
{index === 0 && 'Structured data preparation, frame conditioning, and media normalization for stable inference.'} {index === 1 && 'Spatial and frequency-domain descriptors are fused to retain complementary forensic evidence.'} {index === 2 && 'EfficientNet B2 and FFT-informed features capture both visual artefacts and spectral anomalies.'} {index === 3 && 'Random Forest and XGBoost ensemble outputs improve robustness beyond a single-model vote.'} {index === 4 && 'Final verdicts are paired with heatmap localisation and metadata summaries for evaluator review.'}
{principle.text}
UAIDE is positioned not as a black-box demo, but as a documented academic system with defined roles across research, design, modeling, and integration.
{member.role}
{member.note}