{% extends "base.html" %} {% block title %}TasteEngine — Evaluation{% endblock %} {% block head_extra %} {% endblock %} {% block breadcrumb %}
{% endblock %} {% block content %} {% from "macros.html" import glass, spinner %}Comprehensive analysis of all recommendation methods and approaches using 6 evaluation metrics. Methods are evaluated one at a time — results appear as they complete.
| Method | RMSE ↓ | MAE ↓ | Precision@5 ↑ | Recall@5 ↑ | F1@5 ↑ | Coverage ↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEST | ||||||
| Click "Run Evaluation" to start | ||||||
| Approach | Precision@5 ↑ | Recall@5 ↑ |
|---|---|---|
| BEST |
Normalized comparison across all metrics for every CF method.
Differences arise from algorithmic biases: CF relies on the collective behavior of users, making it powerful for popular items but weak for new users/items. Content-Based depends on feature representation quality and tends to overspecialize. Knowledge-Based is deterministic and transparent but requires explicit user input and domain rules. The choice depends on data availability, user context, and the specific recommendation goal.