Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,8 +3,176 @@ title: README
|
|
| 3 |
emoji: 📈
|
| 4 |
colorFrom: indigo
|
| 5 |
colorTo: gray
|
| 6 |
-
sdk:
|
| 7 |
pinned: false
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
emoji: 📈
|
| 4 |
colorFrom: indigo
|
| 5 |
colorTo: gray
|
| 6 |
+
sdk: static
|
| 7 |
pinned: false
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
## Who We Are
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
AstroMLab is a dynamic group of *astrophysicists* and *computer scientists* passionate about pushing the boundaries of **Large Language Models (LLMs)in astronomy**. Our team includes:
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
- *Leading astronomers, astrophysicists, and cosmologists*
|
| 16 |
+
- *Top natural language processing experts* from Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory
|
| 17 |
+
- *Frontier arXivists* from the NASA Astrophysics Data System
|
| 18 |
+
- *Enthusiastic young researchers* bridging the gap between astronomy and LLMs
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
While LLMs are advancing rapidly, we believe that real progress in *AI-driven astronomical research* requires *deep domain knowledge*. This conviction drives us to tackle the challenges in applying LLMs to astronomy head-on.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
## Our Goals
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
Our ultimate aim is to:
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
1. Develop specialized LLMs for astronomy
|
| 27 |
+
2. Create **reliable, light-weight, and open-source models** adaptable for advanced research agents
|
| 28 |
+
3. **Expedite scientific discovery** through LLM-driven end-to-end research
|
| 29 |
+
4. Push the boundaries of what's possible in astronomical research
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## Our Achievements
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
Despite being a young group, we've made significant strides:
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
- Curated the **first extensive astronomy-based benchmarking dataset** using high-quality review articles ([Ting et al. 2024](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11194))
|
| 36 |
+
- Explored training of specialized astronomy LLMs
|
| 37 |
+
- Released three model sets:
|
| 38 |
+
- **AstroSage-8B** (coming soon, de Haan et al. 2024)
|
| 39 |
+
- **AstroLLaMA-2-70B** ([Pan et al. 2024](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11194))
|
| 40 |
+
- **AstroLLaMA-3-8B** ([Pan et al. 2024](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11194))
|
| 41 |
+
- AstroLLaMA-2-7B ([Perkowski et al. 2024](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01916), [Nguyen et al. 2023](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06126), developed during our time at *UniverseTBD*)
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
Our flagship model, AstroSage-8B, demonstrates remarkable performance when compared to other models in the 7B class. It achieves a substantial lead of 3.5 percentage points over its closest competitor, which translates to an estimated **10-fold reduction** in computational costs (see the [AstroBench page](benchmarking.html) for details).
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
| Model | Score (%) |
|
| 46 |
+
|-------|-----------|
|
| 47 |
+
| **<span style="color: #3366cc;">AstroSage-8B (AstroMLab)</span>** | **<span style="color: #3366cc;">77.2</span>** |
|
| 48 |
+
| LLaMA-3.1-8B | 73.7 |
|
| 49 |
+
| **<span style="color: #3366cc;">AstroLLaMA-2-70B (AstroMLab)</span>** | **<span style="color: #3366cc;">72.3</span>** |
|
| 50 |
+
| Gemma-2-9B | 71.5 |
|
| 51 |
+
| Qwen-2.5-7B | 70.4 |
|
| 52 |
+
| Yi-1.5-9B | 68.4 |
|
| 53 |
+
| InternLM-2.5-7B | 64.0 |
|
| 54 |
+
| Mistral-7B-v0.3 | 63.9 |
|
| 55 |
+
| ChatGLM3-6B | 50.4 |
|
| 56 |
+
| AstroLLaMA-2-7B (UniverseTBD) | 44.3 |
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+

|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
The exceptional performance of AstroSage-8B showcases the potential for more efficient and cost-effective agentic research in astronomy. This advancement opens up new possibilities for widespread application of AI in astronomical research, making sophisticated analysis more accessible to a broader range of institutions and researchers.
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
## Open Source Commitment
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
We are fully committed to open source:
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
- All our models are released on **Hugging Face**
|
| 68 |
+
- Find our models here: [AstroMLab on Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/AstroMLab)
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
## Our Support and Vision
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
We are grateful for our supporters:
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
- Access to the Frontier nodes at Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility
|
| 76 |
+
- Backing from Microsoft's Accelerating Foundation Models Research (AFMR)
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
## Join Us
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
Our team is expanding, and we'd love to hear from you!
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
- Contact us: [astromachinelearninglab@gmail.com](mailto:astromachinelearninglab@gmail.com)
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
<br>
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
---
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## Team
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
<table>
|
| 92 |
+
<tr>
|
| 93 |
+
<td align="center" width="25%"><img src="figures/Members_Yuan-Sen_Ting.png" alt="Yuan-Sen Ting"></td>
|
| 94 |
+
<td align="center" width="25%"><img src="figures/Members_Tirthankar_Ghosal.png" alt="Tirthankar Ghosal"></td>
|
| 95 |
+
<td align="center" width="25%"><img src="figures/Members_Tijmen_de_Haan.png" alt="Tijmen de Haan"></td>
|
| 96 |
+
<td align="center" width="25%"><img src="figures/Members_Josh_Nguyen.png" alt="Josh Nguyen"></td>
|
| 97 |
+
</tr>
|
| 98 |
+
<tr>
|
| 99 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Yuan-Sen Ting</strong><br>The Ohio State University</td>
|
| 100 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Tirthankar Ghosal</strong><br>Oak Ridge National Laboratory</td>
|
| 101 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Tijmen de Haan</strong><br>KEK</td>
|
| 102 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Josh Nguyen</strong><br>University of Pennsylvania</td>
|
| 103 |
+
</tr>
|
| 104 |
+
<tr>
|
| 105 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Rui_Pan.png" alt="Rui Pan"></td>
|
| 106 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Hardik_Arora.png" alt="Hardik Arora"></td>
|
| 107 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Emily_Herron.png" alt="Emily Herron"></td>
|
| 108 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Yuwei_Yang.png" alt="Yuwei Yang"></td>
|
| 109 |
+
</tr>
|
| 110 |
+
<tr>
|
| 111 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Rui Pan</strong><br>University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign</td>
|
| 112 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Hardik Arora</strong><br>Indian Institutes of Technology</td>
|
| 113 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Emily Herron</strong><br>Oak Ridge National Laboratory</td>
|
| 114 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Yuwei Yang</strong><br>Australian National University</td>
|
| 115 |
+
</tr>
|
| 116 |
+
<tr>
|
| 117 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Zechang_Sun.png" alt="Alberto Accomazzi"></td>
|
| 118 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Alberto_Accomazzi.png" alt="Alberto Accomazzi"></td>
|
| 119 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Argonne.png" alt="Azton Wells"></td>
|
| 120 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Nesar_Ramachandra.png" alt="Nesar Ramachandra"></td>
|
| 121 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Sandeep_Madireddy.png" alt="Sandeep Madireddy"></td>
|
| 122 |
+
</tr>
|
| 123 |
+
<tr>
|
| 124 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Zechang Sun</strong><br>Tsinghua University</td>
|
| 125 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Alberto Accomazzi</strong><br>NASA Astrophysics Data System</td>
|
| 126 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Azton Wells</strong><br>Argonne National Laboratory</td>
|
| 127 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Nesar Ramachandra</strong><br>Argonne National Laboratory</td>
|
| 128 |
+
</tr>
|
| 129 |
+
<tr>
|
| 130 |
+
<td align="center"><img src="figures/Members_Sandeep_Madireddy.png" alt="Sandeep Madireddy"></td>
|
| 131 |
+
</tr>
|
| 132 |
+
<tr>
|
| 133 |
+
<td align="center"><strong>Sandeep Madireddy</strong><br>Argonne National Laboratory</td>
|
| 134 |
+
</tr>
|
| 135 |
+
</table>
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
<br>
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
---
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
## Publications
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
### AstroMLab 1: Who Wins Astronomy Jeopardy!?
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
**[Yuan-Sen Ting, et al., 2024, arXiv:2407.11194](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11194)**
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
We present a comprehensive evaluation of proprietary and open-weights large language models using the first astronomy-specific benchmarking dataset. This dataset comprises 4,425 multiple-choice questions curated from the Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, covering a broad range of astrophysical topics.
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
Key findings:
|
| 150 |
+
- Claude-3.5-Sonnet outperforms competitors, achieving 85.0% accuracy.
|
| 151 |
+
- Open-weights models like LLaMA-3-70b (80.6%) and Qwen-2-72b (77.7%) now compete with some of the best proprietary models.
|
| 152 |
+
- We identify performance variations across astronomical subfields, with challenges in exoplanet-related fields, stellar astrophysics, and instrumentation.
|
| 153 |
+
- Top-performing models demonstrate well-calibrated confidence, with correlations above 0.9 between confidence and correctness.
|
| 154 |
+
- The rapid progress suggests that LLM-driven research in astronomy may become feasible in the near future.
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
<br>
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
### AstroMLab 2: AstroLLaMA-2-70B Model and Benchmarking Specialised LLMs for Astronomy
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
**[Rui Pan, Josh Nguyen, et al., 2024](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11194)**
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
We introduce new models: AstroLLaMA-3-8B and AstroLLaMA-2-70B, building upon the previous AstroLLaMA series and quantitatively assess specialized LLMs in astronomy, leveraging recently curated high-quality astronomical MCQs.
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
Key points:
|
| 166 |
+
- Previously released AstroLLaMA series (based on LLaMA-2-7B) underperforms compared to the native LLaMA model.
|
| 167 |
+
- Performance degradation can be partially mitigated by using high-quality data for continual pretraining.
|
| 168 |
+
- Continual pretraining on the 70B model can yield improvements, despite observed catastrophic forgetting in smaller models.
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
<br>
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
### Legacy Output: The AstroLLaMA Series
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
1. **[Josh Nguyen, et al., 2023, arXiv:2309.06126](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06126)**
|
| 175 |
+
2. **[Ernest Perkowski, Rui Pan, et al., 2024, arXiv:2401.01916](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01916)**
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
The first open-source conversational AI tool tailored for the astronomy community -- AstroLLaMA-2-7B and AstroLLaMA-2-7B-Chat.
|
| 178 |
+
|