Terminal / benchmarks /validators.py
Baida07's picture
deploy: disable Qwen reasoning budget for concise responses
17a2a15 verified
Raw
History Blame
13.1 kB
"""Deterministic validators for benchmark outputs.
The validators in this module deliberately do not call an LLM or a provider. They
only normalize an output when the evidence is unambiguous and otherwise return a
stable failure code that the retry layer can act on.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
import json
import re
from typing import Any, Iterable, Mapping, Optional
_MMLU_LETTERS = frozenset("ABCD")
_MMLU_EXPLICIT = re.compile(
r"\b(?:answer|答案|risposta|final(?:\s+answer)?|choice|scelta)\b\s*"
r"(?:is|=|:)\s*[*`_\[\(]*([A-D])[*`_\]\)]*",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
_MMLU_MARKED = re.compile(r"(?:^|\n|\s)(?:\(?([A-D])\)?)[\.:\)](?:\s|$)", re.IGNORECASE)
_MMLU_ISOLATED = re.compile(r"(?<![A-Za-z])([A-D])(?![A-Za-z])", re.IGNORECASE)
_CODE_FENCE = re.compile(
r"```\s*([A-Za-z0-9_+#.-]*)\s*\n?(.*?)```", re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL
)
_CODE_JSON_KEYS = ("code", "typescript", "source", "implementation")
_TS_DECLARATION = re.compile(
r"\b(?:export\s+)?(?:async\s+)?(?:function|class|interface|type|const|let|var)\s+([A-Za-z_$][\w$]*)",
re.MULTILINE,
)
_TS_IMPORT_EXPORT = re.compile(r"\b(?:import|export)\b")
_TS_SYNTAX_TOKENS = re.compile(r"[{}();]|=>|:\s*[A-Za-z_$][\w$<>,\[\]| ]*")
_PLACEHOLDER = re.compile(r"\b(?:TODO|TBD|your implementation|implement here)\b", re.IGNORECASE)
_REASONING_EXPLICIT = re.compile(
r"(?:####|final\s+answer|answer|risposta|risultato|result|total|totale)\s*[:=]?\s*"
r"(-?\d[\d,]*(?:\.\d+)?)",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
_REASONING_BOLD = re.compile(r"\*\*\s*(-?\d[\d,]*(?:\.\d+)?)\s*\*\*")
_REASONING_LINE_NUMBER = re.compile(r"(?m)^\s*(-?\d[\d,]*(?:\.\d+)?)\s*$")
_REASONING_FAILURES = frozenset({"answer_missing", "wrong_numeric_answer", "calculation_conflict"})
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ValidationResult:
"""Stable validator result consumed by shadow mode and retry logic."""
valid: bool
normalized: Optional[str] = None
failure_code: Optional[str] = None
evidence: dict[str, Any] = field(default_factory=dict)
repair_hint: Optional[str] = None
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
return {
"valid": self.valid,
"normalized": self.normalized,
"failure_code": self.failure_code,
"evidence": self.evidence,
"repair_hint": self.repair_hint,
}
def _failure(code: str, *, evidence: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None, hint: str = "") -> ValidationResult:
return ValidationResult(
valid=False,
failure_code=code,
evidence=evidence or {},
repair_hint=hint or None,
)
def _success(normalized: str, *, evidence: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None) -> ValidationResult:
return ValidationResult(valid=True, normalized=normalized, evidence=evidence or {})
def _clean_text(raw: Any) -> str:
if raw is None:
return ""
if isinstance(raw, str):
return raw.strip()
return str(raw).strip()
def _mmlu_candidates(text: str) -> list[str]:
"""Return candidates in evidence order, preserving duplicates for ambiguity checks."""
explicit = [m.group(1).upper() for m in _MMLU_EXPLICIT.finditer(text)]
if explicit:
return explicit
marked = [m.group(1).upper() for m in _MMLU_MARKED.finditer(text)]
if marked:
return marked
return [m.group(1).upper() for m in _MMLU_ISOLATED.finditer(text)]
def validate_mmlu_output(raw: Any, *, expected: Optional[str] = None) -> ValidationResult:
"""Validate a multiple-choice answer without guessing from explanation prose.
Accepted outputs contain one unambiguous A/B/C/D choice. Explicit labels such
as ``ANSWER: C`` have priority over marked choices and isolated letters. If
multiple distinct candidates are present, the result is ambiguous and fails.
``expected`` is optional and is only used to expose correctness in evidence; it
never changes the parsing result.
"""
text = _clean_text(raw)
if not text:
return _failure(
"answer_missing",
hint="Return exactly one canonical choice using ANSWER: A, B, C, or D.",
)
candidates = _mmlu_candidates(text)
distinct = sorted(set(candidates))
evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
"candidates": candidates,
"distinct_candidates": distinct,
"source_length": len(text),
}
if expected is not None:
normalized_expected = str(expected).strip().upper()
evidence["expected"] = normalized_expected
if normalized_expected in _MMLU_LETTERS:
evidence["correct"] = len(distinct) == 1 and distinct[0] == normalized_expected
if not candidates:
return _failure(
"answer_missing",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Return exactly one canonical choice using ANSWER: A, B, C, or D.",
)
if len(distinct) != 1 or distinct[0] not in _MMLU_LETTERS:
return _failure(
"answer_ambiguous",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Remove competing choices and return one letter: A, B, C, or D.",
)
return _success(distinct[0], evidence=evidence)
def _extract_code(raw: Any) -> tuple[Optional[str], str, dict[str, Any]]:
"""Extract code from a TypeScript fence or a JSON envelope."""
text = _clean_text(raw)
if not text:
return None, "none", {"source_length": 0}
try:
decoded = json.loads(text)
except (TypeError, json.JSONDecodeError):
decoded = None
if isinstance(decoded, Mapping):
for key in _CODE_JSON_KEYS:
value = decoded.get(key)
if isinstance(value, str) and value.strip():
return value.strip(), f"json:{key}", {"source_length": len(text)}
fences = _CODE_FENCE.findall(text)
if fences:
typed = [body.strip() for language, body in fences if language.lower() in {"ts", "typescript"}]
if typed:
return max(typed, key=len), "fence:typescript", {"fence_count": len(fences)}
return None, "fence:wrong-language", {"languages": [language.lower() for language, _ in fences]}
return None, "none", {"source_length": len(text)}
def _normalize_symbols(required_symbols: Iterable[str]) -> list[str]:
return [symbol.strip() for symbol in required_symbols if str(symbol).strip()]
def _parse_numeric_token(value: str) -> int | float:
normalized = value.replace(",", "").strip()
number = float(normalized) if "." in normalized else int(normalized)
return number
def _reasoning_candidates(text: str) -> tuple[list[int | float], str]:
"""Extract answer candidates conservatively, preferring explicit final markers."""
explicit = [_parse_numeric_token(match.group(1)) for match in _REASONING_EXPLICIT.finditer(text)]
if explicit:
return explicit, "explicit"
bold = [_parse_numeric_token(match.group(1)) for match in _REASONING_BOLD.finditer(text)]
if bold:
return bold, "bold"
lines = [_parse_numeric_token(match.group(1)) for match in _REASONING_LINE_NUMBER.finditer(text)]
if lines:
return lines[-1:], "final_line"
return [], "none"
def validate_reasoning_output(raw: Any, *, expected: Optional[int | float] = None) -> ValidationResult:
"""Validate a numeric reasoning answer without calling an LLM.
Explicit final markers have priority over intermediate arithmetic. Multiple
distinct explicit answers are classified as a conflict rather than guessed.
"""
text = _clean_text(raw)
if not text:
return _failure(
"answer_missing",
hint="Show the calculation and finish with #### N, where N is the final integer.",
)
candidates, source = _reasoning_candidates(text)
distinct = list(dict.fromkeys(candidates))
evidence: dict[str, Any] = {
"candidates": candidates,
"distinct_candidates": distinct,
"source": source,
"source_length": len(text),
}
if expected is not None:
try:
normalized_expected = _parse_numeric_token(str(expected))
evidence["expected"] = normalized_expected
except ValueError:
normalized_expected = expected
if not candidates:
return _failure(
"answer_missing",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Show the calculation and finish with #### N, where N is the final integer.",
)
if len(distinct) > 1:
return _failure(
"calculation_conflict",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Recalculate the final value and provide exactly one final numeric answer.",
)
normalized = distinct[0]
if expected is not None and normalized != normalized_expected:
evidence["correct"] = False
return _failure(
"wrong_numeric_answer",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Recheck every arithmetic step and return the corrected final number.",
)
evidence["correct"] = True if expected is not None else None
return _success(str(normalized), evidence=evidence)
def validate_reasoning_retry(
goal: Any,
raw: Any,
*,
expected: Optional[int | float] = None,
is_last_attempt: bool,
) -> Optional[ValidationResult]:
"""Return a reasoning failure only when a non-final numeric retry is warranted."""
if is_last_attempt or not any(marker in str(goal or "").lower() for marker in ("reasoning", "gsm8k", "risolvi il problema matematico")):
return None
result = validate_reasoning_output(raw, expected=expected)
return result if result.failure_code in _REASONING_FAILURES else None
_CODING_RETRY_FAILURES = frozenset({
"code_missing",
"code_wrong_language",
"code_empty",
"code_placeholder",
"required_symbol_missing",
"code_syntax_suspect",
})
def is_typescript_goal(goal: Any) -> bool:
lowered = str(goal or "").lower()
return any(marker in lowered for marker in ("code_correct", "typescript", "```ts", "```typescript"))
def validate_coding_retry(goal: Any, raw: Any, *, is_last_attempt: bool) -> Optional[ValidationResult]:
"""Return the failed result only when a non-final TypeScript retry is warranted."""
if is_last_attempt or not is_typescript_goal(goal):
return None
result = validate_coding_output(raw)
return result if result.failure_code in _CODING_RETRY_FAILURES else None
def validate_coding_output(
raw: Any,
*,
required_symbols: Iterable[str] = (),
min_significant_lines: int = 1,
reject_placeholders: bool = True,
) -> ValidationResult:
"""Validate extraction and minimum structural quality of TypeScript output.
This is intentionally a contract validator, not a compiler. Syntax checks are
conservative and deterministic; full compilation remains a separate isolated
integration test because it depends on the repository's TypeScript toolchain.
"""
code, source, extraction_evidence = _extract_code(raw)
if code is None:
failure = "code_wrong_language" if source == "fence:wrong-language" else "code_missing"
return _failure(
failure,
evidence=extraction_evidence | {"extraction": source},
hint="Return exactly one non-empty ```typescript code block.",
)
significant_lines = [line for line in code.splitlines() if line.strip() and not line.strip().startswith("//")]
evidence: dict[str, Any] = extraction_evidence | {
"extraction": source,
"significant_lines": len(significant_lines),
"has_import_or_export": bool(_TS_IMPORT_EXPORT.search(code)),
"has_syntax_tokens": bool(_TS_SYNTAX_TOKENS.search(code)),
}
if not significant_lines or len(significant_lines) < max(1, min_significant_lines):
return _failure(
"code_empty",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Provide a complete non-empty TypeScript implementation.",
)
if reject_placeholders and _PLACEHOLDER.search(code):
return _failure(
"code_placeholder",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Replace TODO/TBD placeholders with executable TypeScript.",
)
declarations = {match.group(1) for match in _TS_DECLARATION.finditer(code)}
required = _normalize_symbols(required_symbols)
missing = [symbol for symbol in required if symbol not in declarations and not re.search(rf"\b{re.escape(symbol)}\b", code)]
evidence["declarations"] = sorted(declarations)
evidence["required_symbols"] = required
evidence["missing_symbols"] = missing
if missing:
return _failure(
"required_symbol_missing",
evidence=evidence,
hint=f"Implement and expose the required symbols: {', '.join(missing)}.",
)
if not _TS_SYNTAX_TOKENS.search(code):
return _failure(
"code_syntax_suspect",
evidence=evidence,
hint="Return syntactically structured TypeScript with declarations and delimiters.",
)
return _success(code, evidence=evidence)