Case-law gap round: 71 governing authorities added (194 decisions); new-case-law watch; quarterly audit

Six domain reviewers diffed the corpus against canonical authorities and
every gap was filled: the SCC scaffolding the border cases apply (Grant,
Jarvis, Golden, Chehil, Hunter, Collins, Suberu, Kang-Brown, Vu, Guindon,
Wigglesworth...), the s. 44/misrep/danger-opinion FCA line (Sharma, Sidhu,
Ragupathy, Obazughanmwen, Nagalingam, Revell, Bermudez, Coomaraswamy,
McAlpin, Pepa 2025 SCC 21), the IFA trilogy + refugee standards captured
from CanLII (Rasaratnam, Thirunavukkarasu, Ranganathan, Adjei, Maldonado,
Sahin), customs/trade (Mattel, C.B. Powell, Bri-Chem, Chen, Fritz,
Skechers), the labour backbone (Weber, Vaughan, Burchill, Wm Scott,
McKinley, Gagnon, Noel, Meiorin, Fraser-loyalty, Heyser, Frazee), the
admin-law foundation (Cardinal, CJL v NEB, Harrison, Maple Lodge, Mount
Sinai, Mobil Oil, Strickland, Blencoe, Abrametz, Auer, Prassad, CPR,
Patanguli carrying QuickLaw-only Tipple's rule), and the second tier at
the maintainer's direction (Nolet, Horrocks, Parry Sound, AJC, Hilewitz,
Tapambwa, Lidder). The weekly check now trips on the CIU Important-
Decisions page (the one automated new-case-law signal) and a quarterly
gap-audit scheduled task fires each Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. 49,037 chunks /
54,766 vectors. Gate: ALL Hit@10 1.00 (first time); legacy
0.77/0.94/0.98/1.00 MRR 0.86; holdout 1.00 Hit@3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

canlex/caselaw.py

@@ -213,6 +213,10 @@ CASES = [
      "topic": "Judicial review of 2017 PSLREB 55; compensation for a "
               "victim of workplace sexual assault in the federal public "
               "service; remedial authority of the Board"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 127201, "short": "Patanguli",
+     "topic": "A de novo hearing before the Board cures procedural defects "
+              "in the employer's investigation (applying Tipple); dismissal "
+              "of a CIC employee for cheating in a staffing process"},
     {"court": "fc", "id": 525537, "short": "Marentette",
      "topic": "Workplace violence and harassment investigations under the "
               "Canada Labour Code; procedural fairness owed to the "
@@ -343,6 +347,206 @@ CASES = [
               "where only part is shown to be of legitimate origin"},
 
     # --- Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board ---
+    # 2026-07 gap audit: the governing authorities the corpus's own
+    # decisions apply, identified per doctrinal domain and verified
+    # against the issuing courts' records before ingestion.
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 7799, "short": "Grant",
+     "topic": "The governing s. 24(2) exclusion framework and the "
+              "controlling definition of physical and psychological "
+              "detention"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2015, "short": "Jarvis",
+     "topic": "The predominant-purpose test: when a regulatory audit "
+              "becomes a penal investigation engaging full Charter "
+              "protections"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1924, "short": "Golden",
+     "topic": "Strip searches are never routine: independent reasonable "
+              "grounds and a reasonable manner required"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 13264, "short": "Chehil",
+     "topic": "The reasonable-suspicion standard: an objectively "
+              "discernible constellation of factors assessed in their "
+              "totality"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 5274, "short": "Hunter",
+     "topic": "The s. 8 foundation: reasonable expectation of privacy and "
+              "the presumptive warrant requirement"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 7800, "short": "Suberu",
+     "topic": "Section 10(b) attaches immediately on detention; when an "
+              "investigative encounter crystallizes into detention"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 4627, "short": "Kang-Brown",
+     "topic": "Sniffer-dog deployment is a s. 8 search, grounded on "
+              "reasonable suspicion"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1492, "short": "Collins",
+     "topic": "The tripartite s. 8 reasonableness test: authorized by "
+              "law, a reasonable law, conducted reasonably"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 15478, "short": "Guindon",
+     "topic": "When an administrative monetary penalty engages Charter s. "
+              "11 protections (it ordinarily does not)"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 13327, "short": "Vu",
+     "topic": "Computers attract a distinct, heightened privacy interest "
+              "requiring specific search authorization"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 13265, "short": "MacKenzie",
+     "topic": "Reasonable suspicion applied to a vehicle sniffer-dog "
+              "search on traveller-profile indicators"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 21114, "short": "Pepa",
+     "topic": "IAD appeal rights under s. 63(2) for a foreign national "
+              "whose permanent resident visa expired after entry"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1874, "short": "Mattel",
+     "topic": "Customs valuation under s. 48: royalties and licence fees "
+              "are dutiable only as a condition of the sale"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 266, "short": "Wigglesworth",
+     "topic": "The two-part test for Charter s. 11: proceedings criminal "
+              "by nature or carrying a true penal consequence"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1276, "short": "Weber",
+     "topic": "Exclusive jurisdiction: disputes arising from the "
+              "collective agreement go to grievance arbitration, not the "
+              "courts"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2211, "short": "Vaughan",
+     "topic": "Courts decline jurisdiction over federal public-service "
+              "workplace disputes covered by the statutory grievance "
+              "scheme"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1876, "short": "McKinley",
+     "topic": "Dishonesty is not automatically just cause for dismissal: "
+              "the contextual, proportional approach"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 5271, "short": "Gagnon",
+     "topic": "The five governing principles of the union's duty of fair "
+              "representation"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1877, "short": "Noel (DFR)",
+     "topic": "The duty of fair representation restated: arbitrary, "
+              "discriminatory, bad-faith or seriously negligent conduct"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1724, "short": "Meiorin",
+     "topic": "The unified three-step bona fide occupational requirement "
+              "test for workplace standards and accommodation"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 96, "short": "Fraser (loyalty)",
+     "topic": "The federal public servant's duty of loyalty balanced "
+              "against freedom of expression"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 106, "short": "Cardinal",
+     "topic": "Procedural fairness binds every public authority; a breach "
+              "voids the decision regardless of the likely outcome"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2574, "short": "CJL v NEB",
+     "topic": "The reasonable-apprehension-of-bias test: what an informed "
+              "person, viewing the matter realistically, would conclude"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2660, "short": "Harrison",
+     "topic": "The Carltona doctrine: ministerial powers are "
+              "presumptively exercisable by responsible departmental "
+              "officials"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2446, "short": "Maple Lodge",
+     "topic": "Fettering of discretion: policy guidelines cannot be "
+              "applied as binding rules excluding relevant considerations"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1879, "short": "Mount Sinai",
+     "topic": "Legitimate expectations are procedural only; public-law "
+              "estoppel against a minister is narrow and yields to "
+              "statute"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1107, "short": "Mobil Oil",
+     "topic": "The futility exception: relief for a fairness breach may "
+              "be withheld where the outcome was legally inevitable"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 15438, "short": "Strickland",
+     "topic": "Discretionary refusal of judicial review and the adequate- "
+              "alternative-remedy framework"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 1808, "short": "Blencoe",
+     "topic": "Administrative delay is an abuse of process only on "
+              "significant prejudice from unacceptable delay"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 19439, "short": "Abrametz",
+     "topic": "The modern three-part test for inordinate administrative "
+              "delay, with proportionate remedies"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 20730, "short": "Auer",
+     "topic": "Vavilov reasonableness, with a presumption of validity, "
+              "governs vires challenges to subordinate legislation"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 431, "short": "Prassad",
+     "topic": "Administrative tribunals are masters of their own "
+              "procedure, subject only to fairness"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 214260, "short": "Sharma",
+     "topic": "Section 44 reports and referrals for permanent residents: "
+              "very limited discretion, no duty to weigh H&C factors"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 407446, "short": "Sidhu",
+     "topic": "Misrepresentation under s. 40: the duty of candour and the "
+              "narrow innocent-misrepresentation exception"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 33323, "short": "Ragupathy",
+     "topic": "The s. 115(2)(a) danger-opinion framework: danger "
+              "assessment, then risk, then balancing"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 521220, "short": "Obazughanmwen",
+     "topic": "Section 44 officers and delegates have no mandate for "
+              "detailed H&C or abuse-of-process inquiries"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 35977, "short": "Nagalingam",
+     "topic": "The s. 115(2)(b) refoulement branch: assessing the nature "
+              "and severity of the acts committed"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 423316, "short": "Revell",
+     "topic": "An inadmissibility determination and s. 44 referral do not "
+              "engage Charter s. 7, even for long-term permanent "
+              "residents"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 143934, "short": "Bermudez",
+     "topic": "Cessation applications: the hearings officer has no "
+              "discretion to weigh H&C factors or a child's best "
+              "interests"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 31594, "short": "Coomaraswamy",
+     "topic": "Vacation of refugee protection under s. 109: establishing "
+              "misrepresentation; only untainted evidence on the second "
+              "branch"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 36788, "short": "Zeng",
+     "topic": "The three-question test for Article 1E exclusion: status "
+              "substantially similar to nationals of a third country"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 32011, "short": "Li (s. 97)",
+     "topic": "The s. 97 protected-person standard is balance of "
+              "probabilities, unlike the lower s. 96 threshold"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 36349, "short": "Li (detention)",
+     "topic": "Anticipated future length of detention is assessed on "
+              "proceedings conducted expeditiously"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 36729, "short": "C.B. Powell",
+     "topic": "Prematurity: the Customs Act re-determination and CITT "
+              "route must be exhausted before judicial review"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 181427, "short": "Bri-Chem",
+     "topic": "CBSA must follow CITT precedent when processing "
+              "corrections; relitigating settled rulings is an abuse of "
+              "process"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 407467, "short": "Chen",
+     "topic": "A s. 135 Customs Act action tests only whether the "
+              "contravention occurred; officer conduct belongs to other "
+              "recourse"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 36351, "short": "Fritz Marketing",
+     "topic": "Challenges to Detailed Adjustment Statements proceed "
+              "through the Customs Act appeal route, not judicial review"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 108541, "short": "Skechers",
+     "topic": "Transaction value: research cost-sharing payments to the "
+              "vendor form part of the price paid or payable"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 231365, "short": "Heyser",
+     "topic": "Termination on revocation of reliability status must rest "
+              "on legitimate grounds, reviewable by the Board"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 308603, "short": "CPR (fairness)",
+     "topic": "Procedural fairness on judicial review: whether the party "
+              "knew the case to meet and had a full chance to respond"},
+    {"court": "fc", "id": 308992, "short": "McAlpin",
+     "topic": "The s. 44 discretion synthesis: any H&C discretion in "
+              "criminality cases is very limited, if it exists at all"},
+    {"court": "fc", "id": 54573, "short": "Frazee",
+     "topic": "Whether an employer measure labelled administrative is in "
+              "substance discipline: corrective intent and impact"},
+    {"court": "onca", "id": 14196, "short": "Chaudhary",
+     "topic": "Habeas corpus is available for lengthy immigration "
+              "detention of uncertain duration"},
+    # Second tier from the 2026-07 gap audit, added at the maintainer's
+    # direction: the strongest of each reviewer's deliberate exclusions.
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 7865, "short": "Nolet",
+     "topic": "Dual-purpose vehicle searches: a valid regulatory search may "
+              "shift to criminal investigation; the Charter consequences of "
+              "each step assessed on its own footing"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 19043, "short": "Horrocks",
+     "topic": "Exclusive labour-arbitration jurisdiction over human-rights "
+              "disputes arising from the collective agreement; the Weber "
+              "framework applied to competing statutory tribunals"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2075, "short": "Parry Sound",
+     "topic": "Statutory employment and human-rights protections are read "
+              "into every collective agreement and enforceable at "
+              "arbitration"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 16827, "short": "AJC v Canada",
+     "topic": "Management rights are exercised subject to reasonableness "
+              "and consistency with the collective agreement (standby "
+              "scheduling of counsel)"},
+    {"court": "scc", "id": 2291, "short": "Hilewitz",
+     "topic": "Medical inadmissibility for excessive demand requires "
+              "individualized assessment of the applicant's actual "
+              "circumstances, including family support"},
+    {"court": "fca", "id": 363658, "short": "Tapambwa",
+     "topic": "Restricted PRRA under s. 112(3): no revisiting of the "
+              "exclusion finding; the scope of protection for excluded "
+              "persons"},
     # The CIU's published "Important Decisions" list (ciu-sdi.ca), ingested
     # 2026-07-23; topics adapted from the union's own subject lines.
     {"court": "fpslreb", "id": 358837, "short": "Bartlett",
@@ -511,6 +715,86 @@ CANLII_CASES = [
               "precise wording and essential elements of the two provisions; "
               "(2) examine the evidence of what was actually done against the "
               "Canadian offence's elements; or (3) both combined"},
+    # 2026-07 gap audit, pre-Decisia authorities: text arrives via the
+    # browser-capture workflow (or a direct PDF fetch for Wm. Scott);
+    # ingestion skips gracefully until each file exists.
+    {"file": "canlii-1991-rasaratnam.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1991/1991canlii13517/1991canlii13517.html",
+     "short": "Rasaratnam", "name": "Rasaratnam v Canada (MEI)",
+     "cite": "[1992] 1 FC 706 (CA)", "report": "1991 CanLII 13517",
+     "date": "1991-12-05", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "The two-prong internal flight alternative test: no serious "
+              "possibility of persecution in the IFA, and reasonableness of "
+              "relocation"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1993-thirunavukkarasu.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1993/1993canlii3011/1993canlii3011.html",
+     "short": "Thirunavukkarasu", "name": "Thirunavukkarasu v Canada (MEI)",
+     "cite": "[1994] 1 FC 589 (CA)", "report": "1993 CanLII 3011",
+     "date": "1993-11-10", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "The reasonableness prong of the IFA test: an objective "
+              "standard, with notice required before an IFA is raised"},
+    {"file": "canlii-2000-ranganathan.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/2000/2000canlii16789/2000canlii16789.html",
+     "short": "Ranganathan", "name": "Ranganathan v Canada (MCI)",
+     "cite": "[2001] 2 FC 164 (CA)", "report": "2000 CanLII 16789",
+     "date": "2000-12-21", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "The very high threshold for an unreasonable IFA: conditions "
+              "jeopardizing life and safety in travelling or relocating"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1994-sahin.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fct/doc/1994/1994canlii3521/1994canlii3521.html",
+     "short": "Sahin", "name": "Sahin v Canada (MCI)",
+     "cite": "[1995] 1 FC 214 (TD)", "report": "1994 CanLII 3521",
+     "date": "1994-10-14", "court_name": "Federal Court (Trial Division)",
+     "topic": "The s. 7 factors for continued immigration detention -- the "
+              "source of IRPR s. 248: reasons, length, future duration, "
+              "delay attribution, alternatives"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1979-maldonado.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1979/1979canlii4098/1979canlii4098.html",
+     "short": "Maldonado", "name": "Maldonado v Canada (MEI)",
+     "cite": "[1980] 2 FC 302 (CA)", "report": "1979 CanLII 4098",
+     "date": "1979-11-19", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "The presumption that a claimant's sworn testimony is true "
+              "unless there is reason to doubt it"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1989-adjei.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1989/1989canlii5184/1989canlii5184.html",
+     "short": "Adjei", "name": "Adjei v Canada (MEI)",
+     "cite": "[1989] 2 FC 680 (CA)", "report": "1989 CanLII 9466",
+     "date": "1989-01-27", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "The s. 96 standard of proof: a reasonable chance or serious "
+              "possibility of persecution, less than balance of probabilities"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1988-toth.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1988/1988canlii1420/1988canlii1420.html",
+     "short": "Toth", "name": "Toth v Canada (MEI)",
+     "cite": "(1988), 86 NR 302 (FCA)", "report": "1988 CanLII 1420",
+     "date": "1988-06-21", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "The tripartite stay test on motions to stay removal: serious "
+              "issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1980-burchill.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1980/1980canlii4207/1980canlii4207.html",
+     "short": "Burchill", "name": "Burchill v Canada (Attorney General)",
+     "cite": "[1981] 1 FC 109 (CA)", "report": "1980 CanLII 4207",
+     "date": "1980-05-20", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "A grievor cannot change the nature of a grievance when it "
+              "reaches adjudication"},
+    {"file": "canlii-1992-lidder.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1992/1992canlii14712/1992canlii14712.html",
+     "short": "Lidder", "name": "Canada (MEI) v Lidder",
+     "cite": "[1992] 2 FC 621 (CA)", "report": "1992 CanLII 14712",
+     "date": "1992-03-10", "court_name": "Federal Court of Appeal",
+     "topic": "Estoppel and legitimate expectations cannot defeat mandatory "
+              "statutory requirements: an officer's representation cannot "
+              "confer a status or bypass conditions the Act imposes"},
+    # Tipple ([1985] FCJ No 818) is QuickLaw-only -- no CanLII record
+    # exists. Its de-novo-cures-defects rule enters the corpus through
+    # Patanguli, 2015 FCA 291 (CASES entry), which quotes and applies it.
+    {"file": "canlii-1976-wmscott.txt",
+     "canlii_path": "en/bc/bclrb/doc/1976/1976canlii1017/1976canlii1017.html",
+     "short": "Wm. Scott", "name": "Wm. Scott & Company Ltd v CFAWU Local P-162",
+     "cite": "[1977] 1 Can LRBR 1 (BCLRB)", "report": "",
+     "date": "1976-10-26",
+     "court_name": "British Columbia Labour Relations Board",
+     "topic": "The three-question discipline framework: was there cause; was "
+              "the penalty excessive; what lesser penalty should substitute"},
     {"file": "canlii-1996-li.txt",
      "canlii_path": "en/ca/fca/doc/1996/1996canlii4086/1996canlii4086.html",
      "short": "Li",

canlex/refresh.py

@@ -82,6 +82,39 @@ _NON_XML = [
 ]
 
 
+_CIU_DECISIONS = "https://ciu-sdi.ca/en/important-decisions/"
+_CIU_DEC_MARKER = PROCESSED_DIR.parent / "raw" / "ciu" / "decisions-page-date.txt"
+
+
+def check_ciu_decisions():
+    """New-case-law tripwire: the CIU curates its Important Decisions page,
+    so its dateModified moving is a cheap signal that a new decision worth
+    ingesting has issued. This is the only automated freshness signal the
+    case-law corpus has -- courts publish no 'new leading case' feed -- and
+    it complements the quarterly gap-audit ritual rather than replacing it."""
+    try:
+        req = urllib.request.Request(
+            _CIU_DECISIONS, headers={"User-Agent": BROWSER_UA})
+        with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=60) as resp:
+            html = resp.read().decode("utf-8", "replace")
+        m = re.search(r'"dateModified":"(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})', html)
+        remote = m.group(1) if m else ""
+    except Exception as exc:
+        return {"stored": "", "remote": "", "status": "error",
+                "error": f"{type(exc).__name__}: {exc}"}
+    if not remote:
+        return {"stored": "", "remote": "", "status": "no-date", "error": ""}
+    stored = (_CIU_DEC_MARKER.read_text(encoding="utf-8").strip()
+              if _CIU_DEC_MARKER.exists() else "")
+    if not stored:
+        # First run: record the baseline rather than alarming.
+        _CIU_DEC_MARKER.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+        _CIU_DEC_MARKER.write_text(remote, encoding="utf-8")
+        stored = remote
+    status = "stale" if remote > stored else "ok"
+    return {"stored": stored, "remote": remote, "status": status, "error": ""}
+
+
 def check_union():
     """Upstream drift for the CIU/PSAC documents (incl. every site VSSA).
 
@@ -541,6 +574,7 @@ def run(as_json=False):
     dmemo_idx = check_dmemo_index()
     tariff = check_tariff_edition(today)
     union = check_union()
+    ciu_dec = check_ciu_decisions()
     pending = pending_in_force(today)
     stale = [r for r in leg if r["status"] in ("stale", "missing-local")]
     errors = [r for r in leg if r["status"] == "error"]
@@ -550,13 +584,14 @@ def run(as_json=False):
     dmemo_stale = dmemo_idx["status"] == "stale"
     tariff_stale = tariff["status"] == "stale"
     union_stale = [r for r in union if r["status"] == "stale"]
+    ciu_dec_stale = ciu_dec["status"] == "stale"
 
     if as_json:
         print(json.dumps({"checked": today, "legislation": leg,
                           "delegation": deleg, "directives": dirs,
                           "non_xml": nonxml, "curated": curated,
                           "dmemo_index": dmemo_idx, "tariff": tariff,
-                          "union": union,
+                          "union": union, "ciu_decisions": ciu_dec,
                           "pending_in_force": pending,
                           "stale_count": (len(stale) + len(deleg_stale)
                                           + len(dirs_stale)
@@ -681,6 +716,19 @@ def run(as_json=False):
         if not union_stale and not any(r["status"] == "error" for r in union):
             print(f"  all {n_union_ok} current (upstream unchanged since fetch)")
 
+        if ciu_dec["status"] == "stale":
+            print(f"\nCIU Important-Decisions page: UPDATED "
+                  f"({ciu_dec['remote']} > {ciu_dec['stored']}) — the union "
+                  f"may have flagged a new decision; review "
+                  f"{_CIU_DECISIONS} and, after ingesting anything new, "
+                  f"update {_CIU_DEC_MARKER.name} to {ciu_dec['remote']}")
+        elif ciu_dec["status"] == "error":
+            print(f"\nCIU Important-Decisions page: ERROR "
+                  f"{ciu_dec['error'][:55]}")
+        else:
+            print(f"\nCIU Important-Decisions page: ok (last modified "
+                  f"{ciu_dec['remote'] or '?'})")
+
         if pending:
             print("\nPending bills now in force (re-ingest the affected Acts):")
             for b in pending:
@@ -691,7 +739,7 @@ def run(as_json=False):
 
     return 1 if (stale or errors or deleg_stale or dirs_stale
                  or curated_flag or dmemo_stale or tariff_stale
-                 or union_stale) else 0
+                 or union_stale or ciu_dec_stale) else 0
 
 
 def main():

data/processed/caselaw.json

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:94e937a9a6a36a17662c7fb63bc1cec7397a28ff910e0c6d5889c2b2ac8deed8
-size 13150503
+oid sha256:a5ad0fe24cd8589c6600f179ff6ad171ca8a2b58702fb79bd8090abadc8ee33c
+size 19418891

data/processed/embeddings.npz

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:2fa0640d280572773d6e35b23454c4de8e589a5d658a11a79e76175cce4faab3
-size 91712138
+oid sha256:31e4eaf89312bea25679f115567343228b1976deab44f1e36ba690f60effb9e0
+size 97045858