File size: 5,063 Bytes
f13098c
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
from pathlib import Path

p = Path(r"C:\Users\dream\CCAI-Demo-Canvas-Upgrades\phd-advisor-frontend\src\components\canvas\canvasData.js")
c = p.read_text(encoding="utf-8")

start = c.index("export const INSIGHTS = [")
end = c.index("export const WIDGET_CATALOG")

insights = r'''export const INSIGHTS = [
  {
    id: 'i-progress',
    title: 'Program progress',
    icon: 'graph',
    category: 'progress',
    confidence: 82,
    summary: 'Zero Trust Phase 2 is 78% complete. MFA enforced for workforce; service accounts and legacy VPN exceptions remain the main gaps before audit sampling.',
    bullets: [
      'Identity: <strong>MFA 94%</strong> workforce · service accounts in remediation',
      'Network: micro-segmentation pilot on <strong>3 app tiers</strong>',
      '<strong>Risk:</strong> 12 VPN exceptions still lack compensating controls',
    ],
    pinned: true,
    sources: 18,
    updatedMinutesAgo: 5,
    quotes: [
      '"MFA rollout blocked on two legacy HR integrations." — IAM workstream notes',
      '"Auditors will sample VPN exception register first." — GRC advisor chat',
    ],
  },
  {
    id: 'i-method',
    title: 'Controls posture',
    icon: 'flask',
    category: 'theory',
    confidence: 71,
    summary: 'SOC 2 CC6/CC7 mappings are drafted. Detection use cases cover ransomware and cred theft; log retention and IR tabletop evidence are still thin.',
    bullets: [
      'Mapped: <strong>CC6.1–CC6.7</strong> access controls with Okta + AWS',
      'Open: centralized logging retention proof for <strong>365 days</strong>',
      'Open: tabletop scenario for <strong>ransomware + exfil</strong> not yet run',
    ],
    sources: 14,
    updatedMinutesAgo: 14,
    quotes: [
      '"Need SIEM retention screenshots before fieldwork." — compliance advisor',
      '"Tabletop scheduled but not executed." — IR lead notes',
    ],
  },
  {
    id: 'i-lit',
    title: 'Threat landscape',
    icon: 'book',
    category: 'literature',
    confidence: 76,
    summary: 'Strong coverage of identity attacks, SaaS misconfigurations, and supply-chain risks for your stack. Weaker on OT exposure and insider threat playbooks.',
    bullets: [
      '<strong>Coverage:</strong> MITRE techniques for cloud identity & SaaS',
      '<strong>Gap:</strong> limited intel on <strong>OAuth consent phishing</strong> variants',
      '<strong>Gap:</strong> no formal insider-threat escalation path documented',
    ],
    sources: 32,
    updatedMinutesAgo: 28,
    quotes: [
      '"OAuth abuse is the fastest-moving thread in your sector." — threat intel advisor',
      '"Insider playbook is a one-pager — not enough for audit." — GRC advisor',
    ],
  },
  {
    id: 'i-questions',
    title: 'Open security questions',
    icon: 'sparkles',
    category: 'theory',
    confidence: 63,
    summary: 'Three live threads. Q1 (scope of zero trust for contractors) gates architecture sign-off. Q2–Q3 affect detection engineering priorities.',
    bullets: [
      '<strong>Q1:</strong> Do contractors get full ZTNA or bastion-only access?',
      '<strong>Q2:</strong> Which SIEM detections are in-scope for SOC 2 evidence?',
      '<strong>Q3:</strong> Is customer data in EU regions in scope for DPA addendum?',
    ],
    sources: 9,
    updatedMinutesAgo: 41,
    quotes: [
      '"Contractor access model blocks network design." — architect advisor',
      '"EU data residency may expand audit scope." — privacy advisor',
    ],
  },
  {
    id: 'i-next',
    title: 'Next steps',
    icon: 'arrow',
    category: 'action',
    confidence: 85,
    summary: 'Near-term actions tied to audit date and production cutover. Two items have slipped one sprint.',
    bullets: [
      'Close <strong>12 VPN exceptions</strong> or document compensating controls',
      'Run ransomware tabletop & upload minutes to evidence locker',
      'Ship <strong>5 high-fidelity detections</strong> to production SIEM',
      'Finalize vendor SOC 2 bridge letter for subprocessors',
    ],
    sources: 7,
    updatedMinutesAgo: 9,
    quotes: [
      '"VPN exceptions are the #1 audit finding risk." — GRC advisor',
      '"Detections without tuning will false-positive in week one." — SOC advisor',
    ],
  },
  {
    id: 'i-blockers',
    title: 'Blockers & risks',
    icon: 'alert',
    category: 'risk',
    confidence: 74,
    summary: 'One technical blocker (legacy logging), one governance blocker (exception approvals). Governance is the higher audit risk.',
    bullets: [
      '<strong>Technical:</strong> legacy app logs not reaching SIEM — 18% of prod traffic',
      '<strong>Governance:</strong> exception approval SLA &gt; 10 days — auditors will flag',
    ],
    sources: 6,
    updatedMinutesAgo: 20,
    quotes: [
      '"Without those logs you cannot prove detective controls." — detection engineer',
      '"Exception backlog reads as control failure." — devil\'s advocate advisor',
    ],
  },
];

'''

p.write_text(c[:start] + insights + c[end:], encoding="utf-8")
print("insights updated")