Spaces:
Running on CPU Upgrade
Running on CPU Upgrade
File size: 10,851 Bytes
61d29fc | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 | """
Agent Evaluation Framework for Databricks Agent Bricks.
Provides:
- Automated evaluation of agent quality
- Ground truth comparison
- Metrics tracking (accuracy, latency, cost)
- A/B testing support
- Regression detection
"""
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional, Callable
import pandas as pd
import mlflow
from datetime import datetime
from dataclasses import dataclass
from loguru import logger
from config import settings
@dataclass
class EvaluationMetrics:
"""Container for evaluation metrics."""
accuracy: float
precision: float
recall: float
f1_score: float
avg_latency_ms: float
avg_tokens: float
total_cost: float
error_rate: float
class AgentEvaluator:
"""
Evaluates agent performance using MLflow.
Integrates with:
- MLflow Evaluate API
- Mosaic AI Agent Framework evaluation
- Unity Catalog for versioning
"""
def __init__(self, agent_name: str):
"""
Initialize evaluator.
Args:
agent_name: Name of agent to evaluate
"""
self.agent_name = agent_name
self.catalog = settings.catalog_name
self.schema = settings.schema_name
def evaluate_agent(
self,
model_uri: str,
eval_data: pd.DataFrame,
evaluators: Optional[List[str]] = None,
custom_metrics: Optional[List[Callable]] = None
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Evaluate an agent using MLflow.
Args:
model_uri: URI of model to evaluate (e.g., "models:/main.agents.classifier/1")
eval_data: DataFrame with input data and ground truth
Must have columns: 'inputs', 'ground_truth'
evaluators: List of built-in evaluators ("default", "exact_match", etc.)
custom_metrics: Custom metric functions
Returns:
Evaluation results
"""
logger.info(f"Evaluating {model_uri}")
# Load model
model = mlflow.pyfunc.load_model(model_uri)
# Default evaluators if none specified
if evaluators is None:
evaluators = ["default"]
# Run evaluation
with mlflow.start_run(run_name=f"eval_{self.agent_name}") as run:
results = mlflow.evaluate(
model=model_uri,
data=eval_data,
targets="ground_truth",
model_type="text",
evaluators=evaluators,
extra_metrics=custom_metrics
)
# Log additional metrics
mlflow.log_param("eval_dataset_size", len(eval_data))
mlflow.log_param("evaluators", ",".join(evaluators))
logger.info(f"Evaluation complete. Run ID: {run.info.run_id}")
return {
"run_id": run.info.run_id,
"metrics": results.metrics,
"tables": results.tables
}
def evaluate_classifier(
self,
model_uri: str,
test_documents: List[Dict[str, Any]],
ground_truth: List[str]
) -> EvaluationMetrics:
"""
Evaluate a classifier agent.
Args:
model_uri: Model URI
test_documents: List of test documents with 'document_id', 'title', 'content'
ground_truth: List of true labels
Returns:
Evaluation metrics
"""
model = mlflow.pyfunc.load_model(model_uri)
# Get predictions
predictions = []
latencies = []
for doc in test_documents:
start = datetime.now()
result = model.predict(doc)
end = datetime.now()
predictions.append(result.get("primary_topic"))
latencies.append((end - start).total_seconds() * 1000)
# Calculate metrics
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_recall_fscore_support
accuracy = accuracy_score(ground_truth, predictions)
precision, recall, f1, _ = precision_recall_fscore_support(
ground_truth, predictions, average='weighted', zero_division=0
)
metrics = EvaluationMetrics(
accuracy=accuracy,
precision=precision,
recall=recall,
f1_score=f1,
avg_latency_ms=sum(latencies) / len(latencies),
avg_tokens=0, # Would track from LLM calls
total_cost=0, # Would calculate from token usage
error_rate=0
)
# Log to MLflow
with mlflow.start_run(run_name=f"eval_classifier_{datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d_%H%M')}"):
mlflow.log_metrics({
"accuracy": metrics.accuracy,
"precision": metrics.precision,
"recall": metrics.recall,
"f1_score": metrics.f1_score,
"avg_latency_ms": metrics.avg_latency_ms
})
# Log confusion matrix
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
cm = confusion_matrix(ground_truth, predictions)
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 8))
sns.heatmap(cm, annot=True, fmt='d', cmap='Blues')
plt.title('Classification Confusion Matrix')
plt.ylabel('True Label')
plt.xlabel('Predicted Label')
mlflow.log_figure(plt.gcf(), "confusion_matrix.png")
plt.close()
return metrics
def compare_versions(
self,
version_a: str,
version_b: str,
eval_data: pd.DataFrame
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Compare two model versions (A/B testing).
Args:
version_a: First version number
version_b: Second version number
eval_data: Evaluation dataset
Returns:
Comparison results
"""
model_name = f"{self.catalog}.{self.schema}.{self.agent_name}"
logger.info(f"Comparing {model_name} v{version_a} vs v{version_b}")
# Evaluate version A
uri_a = f"models:/{model_name}/{version_a}"
results_a = self.evaluate_agent(uri_a, eval_data)
# Evaluate version B
uri_b = f"models:/{model_name}/{version_b}"
results_b = self.evaluate_agent(uri_b, eval_data)
# Compare metrics
comparison = {
"version_a": {
"version": version_a,
"metrics": results_a["metrics"]
},
"version_b": {
"version": version_b,
"metrics": results_b["metrics"]
},
"improvements": {}
}
# Calculate improvements
for metric_name in results_a["metrics"]:
if metric_name in results_b["metrics"]:
a_val = results_a["metrics"][metric_name]
b_val = results_b["metrics"][metric_name]
if isinstance(a_val, (int, float)) and isinstance(b_val, (int, float)):
improvement = ((b_val - a_val) / a_val * 100) if a_val != 0 else 0
comparison["improvements"][metric_name] = {
"v{version_a}": a_val,
"v{version_b}": b_val,
"improvement_pct": improvement
}
logger.info("Comparison complete")
return comparison
def create_eval_dataset_from_feedback(
self,
feedback_table: str,
min_confidence: float = 0.8,
max_samples: int = 1000
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Create evaluation dataset from user feedback in Delta Lake.
Args:
feedback_table: Feedback table name
min_confidence: Minimum confidence for inclusion
max_samples: Maximum samples to include
Returns:
Evaluation DataFrame
"""
from databricks.sdk import WorkspaceClient
w = WorkspaceClient(
host=settings.databricks_host,
token=settings.databricks_token
)
# Query feedback table
query = f"""
SELECT
document_id,
input_data,
predicted_label,
user_corrected_label,
feedback_timestamp
FROM {self.catalog}.{self.schema}.{feedback_table}
WHERE user_corrected_label IS NOT NULL
AND feedback_confidence >= {min_confidence}
ORDER BY feedback_timestamp DESC
LIMIT {max_samples}
"""
# This would execute via Databricks SQL
# For now, return placeholder
logger.info(f"Would query: {query}")
return pd.DataFrame({
"inputs": [],
"ground_truth": []
})
def run_evaluation_suite():
"""
Run full evaluation suite for all agents.
Usage:
python -m databricks.evaluation
"""
from agents.mlflow_classifier import PolicyClassifierAgent
print("\n🧪 Running Agent Evaluation Suite\n")
# Prepare test data
test_documents = [
{
"document_id": "eval_001",
"title": "Water Quality Board Meeting",
"content": "Discussion of fluoride levels in municipal water supply. Motion to increase fluoridation to optimal levels."
},
{
"document_id": "eval_002",
"title": "School Board Session",
"content": "Proposal for free dental screenings for all elementary students as part of school health program."
},
{
"document_id": "eval_003",
"title": "Budget Committee",
"content": "Review of general fund allocations for the upcoming fiscal year. No health-related items."
}
]
ground_truth = [
"water_fluoridation",
"school_dental_screening",
"not_oral_health_related"
]
# Evaluate classifier
print("📊 Evaluating Policy Classifier...")
evaluator = AgentEvaluator("policy_classifier")
# Note: Would use actual model URI after registration
# metrics = evaluator.evaluate_classifier(
# model_uri="models:/main.agents.policy_classifier/1",
# test_documents=test_documents,
# ground_truth=ground_truth
# )
print("\n✅ Evaluation Suite Complete!")
print(" View results in MLflow UI: {}/ml/experiments".format(settings.databricks_host))
if __name__ == "__main__":
run_evaluation_suite()
|