Apply PI decisions: anon row cap 200, drop CRS, RA verification checklist

Anonymous row cap 500 -> 200 (anonymous tier only; signed-in research
needs thousands of rows - scoping recorded in DECISIONS.md). CRS removed
from the library (5 dimension files; PI decision, citation was missing).
docs/verification_checklist.csv: 525 items / 94 constructs, one row per
item with RA correction columns. Library items approved for public repos
by the PI (rights question resolved).

.env.example

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 
 # ---- Tiers and limits (defaults shown) ----
 # CCR_ANON_MAX_BYTES=2097152        # 2 MB anonymous upload cap
-# CCR_ANON_MAX_ROWS=500             # anonymous row cap per file
+# CCR_ANON_MAX_ROWS=200             # anonymous row cap per file (PI decision)
 # CCR_ANON_MAX_RUNS_PER_DAY=3       # anonymous runs/day, then sign-in
 # CCR_USER_MAX_SAVED_RUNS=15        # saved-run cap for signed-in users
 

DECISIONS.md

@@ -115,3 +115,20 @@ Supabase project. Google-only accounts have no password hash and password login
 them to the Google button. Rejected: supabase-js in the frontend (breaks the
 react+react-dom-only dependency rule for one button) and provider-JWT sessions (would
 fork the tier/ownership logic into two session formats for no benefit).
+
+## 2026-07-14 - PI answers applied (library rights, caps, library pruning)
+1. Questionnaire items INCLUDED in the public repos: PI's call ("I think all of them
+   are public. and we can remove some in the future."). Per-construct removal stays a
+   one-file delete; runs keep immutable snapshots regardless. This unblocks pushing to
+   the lab org and shipping the full library on the dev instance.
+2. Anonymous row cap tightened 500 -> 200 per PI. Applied to the ANONYMOUS tier only
+   (Deva's scoping decision): signed-in research use routinely needs thousands of rows,
+   and the PI's confirmed numbers were all anonymous-tier values. Env-tunable either way.
+3. CRS (Centrality of Religiosity Scale, 5 dimension files) removed from the library
+   per PI ("Dropp CRS too"; it was missing its citation). MFQ-30 and CRT were never
+   imported, so "drop" for those is a no-op. MFQ-2 retained. Existing dev DBs keep
+   already-synced CRS rows until their DB resets (append-only sync never deletes);
+   fresh deploys never see it.
+4. Wording verification assigned to the PI's RA: docs/verification_checklist.csv
+   (525 items across 94 constructs, one row per item with correction columns) generated
+   for that workflow; constructs stay needs_verification until she checks them.

MANUAL_TESTING.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ fake but every flow works; never use for real analysis).
 | `xlsx_upload_demo.xlsx` | Parses like a CSV |
 | a `.txt` or `.pdf` file | Rejected: unsupported file type |
 
-Anonymous limits (signed out): the Step 1 hint shows 2 MB / 500 rows and says
+Anonymous limits (signed out): the Step 1 hint shows 2 MB / 200 rows and says
 uploads are deleted after analysis. Upload `large_demo.csv` (800 rows): rejected
 with a "Sign in (top right)" message. Sign in and retry: accepted.
 

backend/app/auth.py

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ RUNS_COOKIE_NAME = "ccr_runs"
 _SECRET = (os.environ.get("CCR_SESSION_SECRET") or secrets.token_hex(32)).encode()
 
 ANON_MAX_BYTES_DEFAULT = 2 * 1024 * 1024
-ANON_MAX_ROWS_DEFAULT = 500
+ANON_MAX_ROWS_DEFAULT = 200  # PI decision 2026-07-14 (was 500)
 ANON_MAX_RUNS_PER_DAY_DEFAULT = 3
 USER_MAX_SAVED_RUNS_DEFAULT = 15
 ANON_TTL_HOURS_DEFAULT = 0  # 0 = purge disabled (local dev); deployments set 24

packages/construct_library/constructs/centrality_of_religiosity_scale_experience.yaml

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-construct_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_experience
-version: 1
-name: Experience (Centrality of Religiosity Scale)
-language: en
-category: Religiosity
-description: Religiosity - Experience dimension of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale.
-citation: Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3),
-  710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
-verification_status: needs_verification
-source_url: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/3/710
-rights_note: nan
-questionnaire: Centrality of Religiosity Scale
-reverse_flags_source: not_provided_pending_verification
-imported_from: lib.xlsx
-items:
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_experience_5
-  text: How often do you experience situations in which you have the feeling that God or something divine
-    intervenes in your life?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_experience_10
-  text: How often do you experience situations in which you have the feeling that God or something divine
-    wants to communicate or to reveal something to you?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_experience_15
-  text: How often do you experience situations in which you have the feeling that God or something divine
-    is present?
-  reverse_scored: false

packages/construct_library/constructs/centrality_of_religiosity_scale_ideology.yaml

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-construct_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_ideology
-version: 1
-name: Ideology (Centrality of Religiosity Scale)
-language: en
-category: Religiosity
-description: Religiosity - Ideology dimension of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale.
-citation: Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3),
-  710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
-verification_status: needs_verification
-source_url: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/3/710
-rights_note: nan
-questionnaire: Centrality of Religiosity Scale
-reverse_flags_source: not_provided_pending_verification
-imported_from: lib.xlsx
-items:
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_ideology_2
-  text: To what extent do you believe that God or something divine exists?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_ideology_7
-  text: To what extend do you believe in an afterlife—e.g. immortality of the soul, resurrection of the
-    dead or reincarnation?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_ideology_12
-  text: In your opinion, how probable is it that a higher power really exists
-  reverse_scored: false

packages/construct_library/constructs/centrality_of_religiosity_scale_intellect.yaml

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-construct_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_intellect
-version: 1
-name: Intellect (Centrality of Religiosity Scale)
-language: en
-category: Religiosity
-description: Religiosity - Intellect dimension of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale.
-citation: Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3),
-  710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
-verification_status: needs_verification
-source_url: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/3/710
-rights_note: nan
-questionnaire: Centrality of Religiosity Scale
-reverse_flags_source: not_provided_pending_verification
-imported_from: lib.xlsx
-items:
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_intellect_1
-  text: How often do you think about religious issues?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_intellect_6
-  text: How interested are you in learning more about religious topics?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_intellect_11
-  text: How often do you keep yourself informed about religious questions through radio, television, internet,
-    newspapers, or books?
-  reverse_scored: false

packages/construct_library/constructs/centrality_of_religiosity_scale_private_practice.yaml

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-construct_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_private_practice
-version: 1
-name: Private practice (Centrality of Religiosity Scale)
-language: en
-category: Religiosity
-description: Religiosity - Private practice dimension of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale.
-citation: Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3),
-  710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
-verification_status: needs_verification
-source_url: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/3/710
-rights_note: nan
-questionnaire: Centrality of Religiosity Scale
-reverse_flags_source: not_provided_pending_verification
-imported_from: lib.xlsx
-items:
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_private_practice_4
-  text: How often do you pray?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_private_practice_9
-  text: How important is personal prayer for you?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_private_practice_14
-  text: How often do you pray spontaneously when inspired by daily situations?
-  reverse_scored: false

packages/construct_library/constructs/centrality_of_religiosity_scale_public_practice.yaml

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-construct_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_public_practice
-version: 1
-name: Public practice (Centrality of Religiosity Scale)
-language: en
-category: Religiosity
-description: Religiosity - Public practice dimension of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale.
-citation: Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3),
-  710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
-verification_status: needs_verification
-source_url: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/3/710
-rights_note: nan
-questionnaire: Centrality of Religiosity Scale
-reverse_flags_source: not_provided_pending_verification
-imported_from: lib.xlsx
-items:
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_public_practice_3
-  text: How often do you take part in religious services?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_public_practice_8
-  text: How important is to take part in religious services?
-  reverse_scored: false
-- item_id: centrality_of_religiosity_scale_public_practice_13
-  text: How important is it for you to be connected to a religious community?
-  reverse_scored: false