Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| MODULE NAME: | |
| Module 01 – Philosophy, Logic, and Intro to Ethics/ESG | |
| LEARNING OBJECTIVES: | |
| - Identify and evaluate arguments (premises and conclusions), including detection of formal and informal fallacies | |
| - Classify moral arguments according to four traditions: utilitarian (Bentham), rights/duties (Kant), virtue (Aristotle), care (Gilligan) | |
| - Understand introductory ESG considerations | |
| - Analyze business ethical dilemmas | |
| - Create your own moral arguments in favor of a business decision | |
| KEY POINTS: | |
| • Arguments have premises (reasons) and conclusions (claims). Valid arguments have logical structure; sound arguments are valid AND have true premises. | |
| • Formal fallacies: Errors in logical structure (affirming the consequent, denying the antecedent). | |
| • Informal fallacies: Errors in reasoning (ad hominem, straw man, false dilemma, appeal to authority, slippery slope). | |
| • Utilitarian ethics (Bentham/Mill): Right action = greatest good for greatest number. Focus on consequences and outcomes. | |
| • Rights/duties ethics (Kant): Right action = follows universal moral rules and treats people as ends, not means. Focus on principles and duties. | |
| • Virtue ethics (Aristotle): Right action = what a virtuous person would do. Focus on character and excellence. | |
| • Care ethics (Gilligan): Right action = maintains relationships and responds to needs. Focus on context and connection. | |
| • ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance): Framework for evaluating business decisions beyond profit - considers stakeholder impact, sustainability, fairness, and long-term value creation. |