Decision-Fish commited on
Commit
491e090
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): e28b00c

New module11.text

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. modules/module11.txt +24 -0
modules/module11.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ MODULE NAME:
2
+ Module 11 – Countering Bias and Noise
3
+
4
+ LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
5
+ - Explain the activities of a behavioral insight team
6
+ - Illustrate how to test a nudge with a randomized controlled trial (RCT)
7
+ - Describe how nudges can go wrong and the nature of "sludge"
8
+ - Summarize other ways to reduce bias and noise beyond nudges
9
+ - Apply the Ikigai concept to life design
10
+ - Demonstrate how a concept map can show relationships and connections in a complex topic
11
+
12
+ KEY POINTS:
13
+ • Behavioral Insights Teams (Nudge Units): Government/business teams using low-cost behavioral interventions based on psychology and behavioral economics. Use evidence-based RCTs to test effectiveness. Redesign choice architecture to promote better behaviors without restricting choice.
14
+ • Design Thinking Process: Five-stage iterative process: Empathize (understand target population), Define (identify problem/desired behavior), Ideate (generate solution options), Prototype (create testable version), Test (run experiments to measure effectiveness). Used by nudge units to develop and refine interventions.
15
+ • Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs): Gold standard for testing nudges. Four components: Population (target audience), Intervention (specific nudge), Delivery (how/when presented), Measurement (outcome metrics). Random assignment to treatment vs. control group establishes causation.
16
+ • Paternalistic Libertarian Nudge Checklist: Effective nudges are: Libertarian (preserves choice), Paternalistic (helps achieve own goals), Predictable (alters behavior reliably), Beneficial (improves welfare), Low-cost (subtle, scalable), Evidence-based (tested and monitored).
17
+ • Nudge Pitfalls: Can distract from systemic solutions (I-frame vs S-frame). May serve corporate interests over public good. Often have small or temporary effects. Can reduce support for effective policy and shift blame to individuals.
18
+ • Dark Nudges: Exploit System 1 to manipulate against people's interests. Examples: misleading defaults, fear marketing, fake scarcity, hidden fees, decoy pricing. Violate consent and undermine autonomy.
19
+ • Sludge: Unnecessary friction/bureaucracy that makes processes more difficult, discouraging beneficial behaviors. Examples: long forms, long wait times, inconvenient hours/locations (FAFSA, benefits applications, voting, unsubscribing). Usually a dark nudge.
20
+ • Debiasing Techniques Beyond Nudges: Pre-mortems (imagine failure, identify risks), Contrary perspectives (devil's advocate, red/blue teams), Objective measures (rubrics, blind review), Commitment devices (pre-commit to action), 10/10/10 rule (consider 10 min, 10 months, 10 years impacts).
21
+ • Noise Remedies: Mindfulness (reduces mood/stress variability), Structured processes (checklists, rubrics), Averaging judgments (wisdom of crowds - needs independence), Prediction markets (buy/sell outcome contracts; aggregates information with financial incentives).
22
+ • Preventing Groupthink: Appoint devil's advocate, Suspend hierarchy, Create independent subgroups, Seek outside opinions, Use anonymous feedback, Apply Nominal Group Technique (silent generation → sharing → discussion → vote).
23
+ • Ikigai (生き甲斐): Japanese concept meaning "reason for being." Found at intersection of four elements: What you LOVE, What you're GOOD AT, What the WORLD NEEDS, What you can be PAID FOR. True ikigai emerges when all four align. Apply through self-assessment, identifying overlaps, research, and experimentation.
24
+ • Concept Maps: Visual tool showing relationships between concepts. Organizes and structures knowledge. Great for studying and note-taking (sketch-noting).