Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Create STATE_FOIA_EXPANSION_POLICY.md
Browse files
STATE_FOIA_EXPANSION_POLICY.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# State FOIA Expansion Policy
|
| 2 |
+
### Governance Framework for Public Records Integration
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
---
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
## Purpose
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
This policy governs the potential expansion of the Federal FOIA Intelligence Search
|
| 9 |
+
platform to include **state-level public records portals**.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## Eligibility Criteria for State Inclusion
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
A state FOIA portal may be included only if it:
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
1. Provides a public, unauthenticated reading room
|
| 18 |
+
2. Publishes records without usage restrictions
|
| 19 |
+
3. Allows link-based access (no scraping required)
|
| 20 |
+
4. Maintains stable URLs
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
---
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Expansion Safeguards
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
All state integrations must adhere to the following:
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
✔ Link-out only (no mirroring)
|
| 29 |
+
✔ No automated downloading
|
| 30 |
+
✔ No background indexing
|
| 31 |
+
✔ Identical AI opt-in requirements
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
---
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
## Prohibited Integrations
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
The following are explicitly excluded:
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
✖ Law enforcement live databases
|
| 40 |
+
✖ Court sealed records
|
| 41 |
+
✖ Fee-based portals
|
| 42 |
+
✖ Login-restricted systems
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
---
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
## Governance Review Process
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
Each proposed state addition requires:
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
1. Legal review (public records law)
|
| 51 |
+
2. Technical review (URL stability)
|
| 52 |
+
3. Ethical review (privacy implications)
|
| 53 |
+
4. Maintainer approval
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
---
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## AI Constraints
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
AI features for state records:
|
| 60 |
+
- Remain disabled by default
|
| 61 |
+
- Require explicit user opt-in
|
| 62 |
+
- Cannot summarize restricted materials
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
---
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
## Policy Rationale
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
> State expansion must **increase transparency without increasing risk**.
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
Uniform safeguards ensure consistent trust regardless of jurisdiction.
|