Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Create LAW_REVIEW_APPENDIX.md
Browse files- LAW_REVIEW_APPENDIX.md +72 -0
LAW_REVIEW_APPENDIX.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Law-Review Publication Appendix
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
## Abstract
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
Federal FOIA Intelligence Search presents a **link-out, citation-first
|
| 6 |
+
architecture** for researching public government records without scraping,
|
| 7 |
+
indexing, or replicating official sources.
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
---
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
## Contribution to Legal Scholarship
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
This project contributes to discussions on:
|
| 14 |
+
- Responsible AI in legal research
|
| 15 |
+
- FOIA accessibility and transparency
|
| 16 |
+
- Evidentiary citation integrity
|
| 17 |
+
- Ethical limits of automation
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
---
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## Novel Design Elements
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
- Exhibit-aware Bluebook citation automation
|
| 24 |
+
- AI opt-in with cryptographic integrity hashing
|
| 25 |
+
- Link-out-only FOIA federation
|
| 26 |
+
- Zero-persistence architecture
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
---
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
## Methodology
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
- Agency-specific FOIA search URL generation
|
| 33 |
+
- Metadata-only aggregation
|
| 34 |
+
- User-initiated actions
|
| 35 |
+
- Disclosure-first AI integration
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
---
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Legal & Ethical Safeguards
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- No legal advice generation
|
| 42 |
+
- No evidentiary claims by AI
|
| 43 |
+
- No substitution for primary sources
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
---
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
- Does not assess FOIA compliance
|
| 50 |
+
- Does not verify redaction sufficiency
|
| 51 |
+
- Does not infer intent or meaning
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
---
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
## Implications
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
This architecture demonstrates a viable middle ground between:
|
| 58 |
+
- Manual FOIA research
|
| 59 |
+
- Fully automated (and risky) AI legal tools
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
---
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
## Suggested Citation
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
> Godschild, Ezra. *Federal FOIA Intelligence Search: Responsible AI for Public Records Research.* (2026).
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
---
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
## Conclusion
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
The project illustrates how **AI can assist legal research without undermining
|
| 72 |
+
due process, transparency, or evidentiary standards**.
|