Spaces:
Paused
Paused
File size: 65,428 Bytes
5a81b95 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 | <p align="center">
<img src="https://hack23.github.io/cia-compliance-manager/icon-192.png" alt="Hack23 Logo" width="192" height="192">
</p>
<h1 align="center">π‘οΈ Citizen Intelligence Agency β Security Architecture</h1>
<p align="center">
<strong>π Defense-in-Depth Protection for Democratic Transparency</strong><br>
<em>π― Comprehensive Security Framework for Political Data Analysis Platform</em>
</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="#"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Owner-CEO-0A66C2?style=for-the-badge" alt="Owner"/></a>
<a href="#"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Version-1.0-555?style=for-the-badge" alt="Version"/></a>
<a href="#"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Effective-2025--09--18-success?style=for-the-badge" alt="Effective Date"/></a>
<a href="#"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Review-Annual-orange?style=for-the-badge" alt="Review Cycle"/></a>
</p>
**π Document Owner:** CEO | **π Version:** 1.0 | **π
Last Updated:** 2025-09-18 (UTC)
**π Review Cycle:** Annual | **β° Next Review:** 2026-09-18
---
## π― Purpose
This document outlines the comprehensive security architecture of the Citizen Intelligence Agency platform, detailing how we protect our systems and data through multiple security layers while maintaining transparency and accountability in democratic oversight.
## π Table of Contents
- [π Security Documentation Map](#-security-documentation-map)
- [π Authentication Architecture](#-authentication-architecture)
- [π Data Integrity & Auditing](#-data-integrity--auditing)
- [π Session & Action Tracking](#-session--action-tracking)
- [π Security Event Monitoring](#-security-event-monitoring)
- [π Network Security](#-network-security)
- [π VPC Endpoints Security](#-vpc-endpoints-security)
- [ποΈ High Availability Design](#-high-availability-design)
- [πΎ Data Protection](#-data-protection)
- [βοΈ AWS Security Infrastructure](#-aws-security-infrastructure)
- [π° AWS Foundational Security Best Practices](#-aws-foundational-security-best-practices)
- [π΅οΈ Threat Detection & Investigation](#-threat-detection--investigation)
- [π Vulnerability Management](#-vulnerability-management)
- [β‘ Resilience & Operational Readiness](#-resilience--operational-readiness)
- [π Configuration & Compliance Management](#-configuration--compliance-management)
- [π Monitoring & Analytics](#-monitoring--analytics)
- [π€ Automated Security Operations](#-automated-security-operations)
- [π Application Security](#-application-security)
- [π Compliance Framework](#-compliance-framework)
- [π‘οΈ Defense-in-Depth Strategy](#-defense-in-depth-strategy)
- [π Security Operations](#-security-operations)
- [π° Security Investment](#-security-investment)
- [π Conclusion](#-conclusion)
## π Related Documents
| Document | Focus | Description |
|----------|-------|-------------|
| [π‘οΈ Security Architecture](SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | Current State | Complete security implementation overview |
| [π ISMS Compliance Mapping](ISMS_COMPLIANCE_MAPPING.md) | Policy Framework | Comprehensive ISMS-PUBLIC policy mapping |
| [π Future Security Architecture](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | Roadmap | Future security enhancements and capabilities |
| [π° Financial Security Plan](FinancialSecurityPlan.md) | Investment | AWS security implementation costs and ROI |
| [ποΈ Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | System Design | Overall platform architecture |
| [π
End-of-Life Strategy](End-of-Life-Strategy.md) | Lifecycle | Technology maintenance and patching strategy |
| [π― Threat Model](THREAT_MODEL.md) | Risk Analysis | STRIDE/MITRE ATT&CK threat analysis |
## π Authentication Architecture
Our multi-layered authentication and authorization process includes MFA, login blocking, and role-based access control.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Authentication Flow"
direction TB
A[π€ User] -->|"1οΈβ£ Login Request"| B[π Authentication Service]
B -->|"2οΈβ£ Validate"| C{β Valid?}
C -->|"β No"| D[π« Login Blocking]
D -->|"Check Status"| E{π Blocked?}
E -->|"β Yes"| F[β Access Denied]
E -->|"β No"| G[β οΈ Auth Error]
C -->|"β Yes"| H[π’ MFA Verification]
H -->|"Validate Code"| I{β Valid?}
I -->|"β No"| J[β οΈ MFA Error]
I -->|"β Yes"| K[β
Authentication Success]
K -->|"Create"| L[π Security Context]
L -->|"Establish"| M[π€ User Session]
M -->|"Log"| N[π Session Tracking]
end
subgraph "Authorization Flow"
direction TB
M -->|"1οΈβ£ Request Resource"| O[π‘οΈ Security Filter]
O -->|"2οΈβ£ Check Permission"| P{β Authorized?}
P -->|"β No"| Q[β Access Denied]
P -->|"β Yes"| R[β
Access Granted]
R -->|"Method Access"| S[π Security Annotation]
S -->|"Role Check"| T{β Has Role?}
T -->|"β No"| U[β οΈ Security Exception]
T -->|"β Yes"| V[β
Execute Method]
Q & U -->|"Log"| W[π Auth Event]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,L,O fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C,E,I,P,T fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style D,G,J,Q,U fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style H,S fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style K,M,R,V fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style N,W fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
```
### Key Components
- **π Multi-Factor Authentication**: Google Authenticator OTP integration
- **π« Brute Force Protection**: IP, session, and user-based blocking with configurable thresholds
- **π₯ Role-Based Access**: Three security tiers (Anonymous, User, Admin)
- **π Method-Level Security**: `@Secured` annotations for fine-grained control
- **π€ Secure Logout**: Complete session invalidation with audit logging
### Login Blocking Protection
The system implements sophisticated login blocking mechanisms:
```java
private static final String MAX_FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS_RECENT_HOUR_PER_IP =
"Max failed login attempts recent hour per ip";
private static final String MAX_FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS_RECENT_HOUR_PER_SESSION =
"Max failed login attempts recent hour per session";
private static final String MAX_FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS_RECENT_HOUR_PER_USER =
"Max failed login attempts recent hour per user";
```
These thresholds can be configured via the application's administrative interface to adjust security posture based on threat conditions.
## π Data Integrity & Auditing
Our auditing system provides comprehensive traceability and data integrity protection through Javers versioning.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Javers Data Auditing"
direction TB
A[π€ User] -->|"Action"| B[βοΈ Service Layer]
B -->|"Persist"| C[(πΎ Database)]
B -.->|"Intercept"| D[π Javers AOP]
D -->|"Extract"| E[π€ Author Context]
D -->|"Capture"| F[π Change Metadata]
F -->|"Record"| G[π Entity Changes]
F -->|"Record"| H[π Property Changes]
F -->|"Record"| I[π Value Diff]
G & H & I -->|"Store"| J[(π Audit Database)]
K[π Audit Queries] -->|"Access"| J
K -->|"Return"| L[ποΈ Change History]
K -->|"Return"| M[π Author Activity]
K -->|"Return"| N[β±οΈ Timeline View]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C,J fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D,E,K fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style F,G,H,I fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style L,M,N fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Javers Audit Components
- **π AOP Interception**: Transparent capture of all data changes
- **π€ Author Tracking**: Every change attributed to the authenticated user
- **π Complete Change History**: Entity, property, and value-level auditing
- **π Property-Level Tracking**: Detailed before/after snapshots for all changes
- **β±οΈ Temporal Data Access**: Historical view of data at any point in time
### Javers Implementation
Our system uses Javers to provide comprehensive audit trails and data versioning capabilities:
```java
@Bean
public Javers getJavers(final PlatformTransactionManager txManager) {
final JaversSqlRepository sqlRepository = SqlRepositoryBuilder.sqlRepository()
.withConnectionProvider(new ConnectionProvider() {
@Override
public Connection getConnection() {
final SharedSessionContractImplementor session =
entityManager.unwrap(SharedSessionContractImplementor.class);
return session.connection();
}
}).withDialect(DialectName.POSTGRES).build();
return TransactionalJpaJaversBuilder.javers().withTxManager(txManager)
.withObjectAccessHook(new HibernateUnproxyObjectAccessHook())
.registerJaversRepository(sqlRepository)
.withMappingStyle(MappingStyle.BEAN).build();
}
```
The author attribution system ensures every change is linked to the user who made it:
```java
@Bean
public AuthorProvider authorProvider() {
return () -> {
final SecurityContext context = SecurityContextHolder.getContext();
if (context != null && context.getAuthentication() != null) {
return context.getAuthentication().getPrincipal().toString();
} else {
return "system";
}
};
}
```
## π Session & Action Tracking
Our comprehensive user activity tracking system records all user sessions and actions for security monitoring and audit purposes.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "User Activity Tracking"
direction TB
A[π€ User] -->|"Login"| B[π Authentication]
B -->|"Create"| C[π ApplicationSession]
A -->|"Interact"| D[π±οΈ Page/Component]
D -->|"Generate"| E[π ApplicationActionEvent]
E -->|"Associated with"| C
C -->|"Contains"| F[π Session Metadata]
F -->|"Records"| G[π€ User Identifier]
F -->|"Records"| H[π IP Information]
F -->|"Records"| I[π Browser/OS]
F -->|"Records"| J[β° Time Data]
E -->|"Contains"| K[π Action Metadata]
K -->|"Records"| L[π Operation Type]
K -->|"Records"| M[π Page/Element]
K -->|"Records"| N[βοΈ Action Details]
K -->|"Records"| O[β±οΈ Timestamp]
C & E -->|"Store"| P[(πΎ Tracking Database)]
P -->|"Security Analysis"| Q[π Security Alerts]
P -->|"Pattern Analysis"| R[π Usage Analytics]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C,E fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F,K fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style G,H,I,J,L,M,N,O fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style P fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style Q,R fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### ApplicationSession Tracking
Every user session is tracked with comprehensive metadata:
```java
public class ApplicationSession implements ModelObject {
protected String sessionId;
protected String userId;
protected String ipInformation;
protected String userAgentInformation;
protected String operatingSystem;
protected String screenSize;
protected String timeZone;
protected ApplicationSessionType sessionType;
protected List<ApplicationActionEvent> events;
protected Date createdDate;
protected Date destroyedDate;
}
```
Key session tracking features:
- **π Unique Session Identification**: Each session receives a unique ID
- **π€ User Attribution**: All sessions linked to authenticated or anonymous users
- **π‘ Network Context**: IP address and location information
- **π» Device Information**: Browser, OS, and screen characteristics
- **β° Temporal Tracking**: Complete session lifecycle timestamps
- **π Session Type Classification**: Different session types for various contexts
### ApplicationActionEvent Tracking
Every user interaction with the system is recorded as an ApplicationActionEvent:
```java
public class ApplicationActionEvent implements ModelObject {
protected ApplicationOperationType applicationOperation;
protected ApplicationEventGroup eventGroup;
protected String sessionId;
protected String userId;
protected String page;
protected String pageMode;
protected String elementId;
protected String actionName;
protected String errorMessage;
protected String applicationMessage;
protected Date createdDate;
}
```
Key action tracking features:
- **π Operation Categorization**: Events classified by operation type
- **π Event Grouping**: Logical grouping of related events
- **π Session Association**: Every event linked to its parent session
- **π± UI Context**: Page, component, and element identification
- **π Action Details**: Complete description of user action
- **β οΈ Error Tracking**: Any errors associated with the action
- **β±οΈ Precise Timing**: Exact timestamp of each action
## π Security Event Monitoring
Our security event monitoring system captures, analyzes, and responds to security-related events throughout the application.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Security Event Monitoring"
direction TB
A[π Authentication<br>Events] --> B[π Login Success]
A --> C[β οΈ Login Failure]
D[π‘οΈ Authorization<br>Events] --> E[β
Access Granted]
D --> F[β Access Denied]
G[βοΈ System<br>Events] --> H[π Startup]
G --> I[π Shutdown]
G --> J[β οΈ Error]
B & C & E & F & H & I & J -->|"Generate"| K[π ApplicationActionEvent]
K -->|"Contains"| L[π Event Metadata]
L -->|"Records"| M[π Event Type]
L -->|"Records"| N[π€ User ID]
L -->|"Records"| O[π Session ID]
L -->|"Records"| P[π IP Information]
L -->|"Records"| Q[β±οΈ Timestamp]
K -->|"Analyzed by"| R[π¨ Security Rules]
R -->|"May Trigger"| S[β‘ Security Alert]
S -->|"If Critical"| T[π₯ Admin Notification]
K -->|"Store"| U[(πΎ Event Database)]
U -->|"Security Analysis"| V[π Security Dashboard]
U -->|"Compliance"| W[π Audit Reports]
end
style A,D,G fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,E,H fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style C,F,I,J fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style K fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style L,R fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style M,N,O,P,Q fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style S,T fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style U fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style V,W fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Security Event Types
Our system monitors several categories of security events:
1. **π Authentication Events**
- Login success/failure
- Password changes
- MFA enrollments/verifications
- Account lockouts
2. **π‘οΈ Authorization Events**
- Access granted/denied to resources
- Permission changes
- Role assignments
- Privilege escalations
3. **π Data Security Events**
- Sensitive data access
- Unusual data operations
- Large data retrievals
- Encryption operations
4. **βοΈ System Events**
- Application startup/shutdown
- Configuration changes
- System errors
- Integration failures
### Event Monitoring Implementation
The system uses event listeners to capture security events:
```java
public class AuthorizationFailureEventListener
implements ApplicationListener<AuthorizationFailureEvent> {
private static final String ACCESS_DENIED = "Access Denied";
private static final String ERROR_MESSAGE_FORMAT =
"SECURITY:Url:{0} , Method{1} ,{2}{3}{4}{5} source:{6}";
@Override
public void onApplicationEvent(final AuthorizationFailureEvent authorizationFailureEvent) {
// Event handling logic
serviceRequest.setEventGroup(ApplicationEventGroup.APPLICATION);
serviceRequest.setApplicationOperation(ApplicationOperationType.AUTHORIZATION);
serviceRequest.setUserId(UserContextUtil.getUserIdFromSecurityContext());
serviceRequest.setErrorMessage(MessageFormat.format(ERROR_MESSAGE_FORMAT,
requestUrl, methodInfo, AUTHORITIES, authorities,
REQUIRED_AUTHORITIES, configAttributes,
authorizationFailureEvent.getSource()));
serviceRequest.setApplicationMessage(ACCESS_DENIED);
applicationManager.service(serviceRequest);
}
}
```
### Authentication Failure Tracking
The system implements thresholds for detecting authentication attacks:
```java
private static final String MAX_FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS_RECENT_HOUR_PER_IP =
"Max failed login attempts recent hour per ip";
private static final String MAX_FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS_RECENT_HOUR_PER_SESSION =
"Max failed login attempts recent hour per session";
private static final String MAX_FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS_RECENT_HOUR_PER_USER =
"Max failed login attempts recent hour per user";
```
## π Network Security
Our defense-in-depth network architecture implements multiple security layers.
```mermaid
graph TD
subgraph "Multi-Layer Network Security"
A[π Internet] -->|"HTTPS Only"| B[π‘οΈ AWS WAF]
B -->|"Filtered Traffic"| C[βοΈ Load Balancer]
subgraph "Security Zones"
C -->|"Public Zone"| D[π Public Subnets]
D -->|"NAT Gateway"| E[π Private App Subnets]
E -->|"DB Traffic"| F[π Private DB Subnets]
end
G[βοΈ VPC Endpoints] -.->|"Private AWS Access"| E
end
D -->|"Host"| H[π Bastion]
E -->|"Host"| I[π₯οΈ EC2 Instances]
F -->|"Host"| J[(πΎ RDS Database)]
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style E fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style G fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style H fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style I fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style J fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Key Components
- **π‘οΈ AWS WAF**: Guards against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
- **π Network Segmentation**: Three isolated security zones with controlled traffic flow
- **πͺ NAT Gateways**: Secure outbound connectivity for private resources
- **π₯ Security Groups & NACLs**: Layered stateful and stateless filtering
- **π VPC Flow Logs**: Comprehensive traffic monitoring and anomaly detection
- **π TLS Everywhere**: End-to-end encryption for all network traffic
## π VPC Endpoints Security
VPC Endpoints provide secure, private access to AWS services without internet exposure.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph "Private AWS Access"
A[π Private Subnets] --> B[π VPC Endpoints]
B --> C[S3]
B --> D[Secrets<br>Manager]
B --> E[Systems<br>Manager]
B --> F[CloudWatch]
B --> G[KMS]
H[πͺ Interface<br>Endpoints] -.-> B
I[π Gateway<br>Endpoints] -.-> B
end
style A fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style C,D,E,F,G fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style H,I fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Security Benefits
- **π Private Connectivity**: Services accessed through AWS private network
- **π No Internet Exposure**: Traffic never traverses the public internet
- **β‘ Performance**: Lower latency for AWS service requests
- **π Fine-Grained Control**: Endpoint policies restrict actions and resources
- **π Audit Trail**: Complete logging of all endpoint activity
## ποΈ High Availability Design
Our multi-AZ architecture ensures both security and resilience against infrastructure failures.
```mermaid
graph TD
A[βοΈ Load Balancer] --> B[π Public Subnets]
subgraph "Availability Zone A"
B --> |"Zone A"| C[πͺ NAT<br>Gateway A]
C --> D[π Private<br>App A]
D --> E[π Private<br>DB A]
E --> F[(πΎ Primary<br>DB)]
end
subgraph "Availability Zone B"
B --> |"Zone B"| G[πͺ NAT<br>Gateway B]
G --> H[π Private<br>App B]
H --> I[π Private<br>DB B]
I --> J[(πΎ Standby<br>DB)]
end
subgraph "Availability Zone C"
B --> |"Zone C"| K[πͺ NAT<br>Gateway C]
K --> L[π Private<br>App C]
L --> M[π Private<br>DB C]
M --> N[(πΎ Read<br>Replica)]
end
style A fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C,G,K fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D,H,L fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style E,I,M fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F,J,N fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Resilience Features
- **βοΈ Multi-AZ Load Balancing**: Traffic distribution across three availability zones
- **πͺ Redundant NAT Gateways**: One per AZ for fault-tolerant outbound connectivity
- **π Security Consistency**: Identical security controls across all zones
- **πΎ Database Redundancy**: Multi-AZ deployment with automatic failover
- **β‘ Automatic Recovery**: Self-healing infrastructure with health checks
## πΎ Data Protection
Our comprehensive data protection strategy secures data throughout its lifecycle.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Data Protection Strategy"
A[π€ User] <-->|"π TLS 1.3"| B[βοΈ Load Balancer]
B <-->|"π TLS 1.2+"| C[π₯οΈ Application]
C <-->|"π TLS 1.2+"| D[(πΎ Database)]
E[ποΈ Secrets<br>Manager] -->|"Secure Credentials"| C
F[π KMS] -->|"Encryption Keys"| G[π Encrypted<br>Storage]
G --> D
G --> H[π¦ S3 Buckets]
G --> I[πΏ EBS Volumes]
J[π Automatic<br>Rotation] -->|"Update"| E
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style E,F fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style G fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style H,I fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style J fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Protection Mechanisms
- **π End-to-End Encryption**: TLS for all communications
- **π Data-at-Rest Encryption**: KMS encryption for databases, EBS volumes, and S3
- **ποΈ Secrets Management**: Secure credential storage with automated rotation
- **π¦ S3 Security**: Server-side encryption, versioning, and access controls
- **π Key Management**: Automatic key rotation and strict access controls
## βοΈ AWS Security Infrastructure
Our AWS security infrastructure provides comprehensive protection at all levels.
```mermaid
graph TD
subgraph "Defense Layers"
A[π Internet] --> B[π‘οΈ Edge Security]
B --> C[π Network Security]
C --> D[π€ Identity Security]
D --> E[ποΈ Monitoring & Detection]
end
B --> F[π° Shield]
B --> G[π§± WAF]
C --> H[πΈοΈ VPC]
C --> I[π§ Security Groups]
C --> J[π Network ACLs]
D --> K[π₯ IAM]
D --> L[π Roles]
D --> M[π Policies]
E --> N[π΅οΈ GuardDuty]
E --> O[π CloudTrail]
E --> P[π Security Hub]
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C,D,E fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F,G fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style H,I,J fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style K,L,M fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style N,O,P fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Core AWS Security Services
- **π° AWS Shield**: DDoS protection at network and transport layers
- **π§± AWS WAF**: Web application firewall with managed rule sets
- **πΈοΈ VPC Design**: Isolated network segments with controlled traffic flow
- **π₯ IAM Framework**: Least-privilege access model with role-based permissions
- **π΅οΈ GuardDuty**: Continuous threat detection with machine learning
- **π Security Hub**: Unified security and compliance management
## π° AWS Foundational Security Best Practices
Our security architecture aligns with AWS Foundational Security Best Practices (FSBP) controls to ensure a robust security posture.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "AWS FSBP Framework"
A[ποΈ Foundational<br>Controls] --> B[βοΈ Config]
A --> C[π Security Hub]
D[π Threat Detection] --> E[π΅οΈ GuardDuty]
D --> F[π Inspector]
D --> G[π Detective]
H[π Data Protection] --> I[π KMS]
H --> J[π Secrets Manager]
K[π₯ Identity & Access] --> L[π€ IAM]
K --> M[π Access Analyzer]
N[β οΈ Incident Response] --> O[π CloudWatch]
N --> P[π EventBridge]
end
style A,D,H,K,N fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C,E,F,G,I,J,L,M,O,P fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### FSBP Controls Implementation
Our system implements the following AWS Foundational Security Best Practices controls:
#### 1. Foundational Services
- **Config.1**: AWS Config enabled for continuous monitoring of resource configurations
- **SecurityHub.1**: Security Hub enabled to aggregate security findings
#### 2. Threat Detection
- **GuardDuty.1**: GuardDuty enabled for intelligent threat detection
- **GuardDuty.5**: EKS Audit Log Monitoring for Kubernetes security
- **GuardDuty.6**: Lambda Protection for serverless security
- **GuardDuty.7**: EKS Runtime Monitoring for container security
- **GuardDuty.8**: Malware Protection for EC2 instances
- **GuardDuty.9**: RDS Protection for database security
- **GuardDuty.10**: S3 Protection for object storage security
#### 3. Vulnerability Management
- **Inspector.1**: Amazon Inspector enabled for vulnerability assessment
- **Inspector.2**: ECR scanning for container image security
- **Inspector.3**: Lambda code scanning for serverless vulnerabilities
- **Inspector.4**: Lambda standard scanning for runtime protection
#### 4. Identity and Access Management
- **IAM.1-8**: IAM best practices including password policies, MFA, and least privilege
#### 5. Data Protection
- **KMS.1-4**: Encryption key management best practices
- **S3.1-13**: S3 bucket security best practices
### Key Benefits
- **π Comprehensive Coverage**: All critical security areas addressed
- **π Continuous Assessment**: Automated evaluation against security standards
- **π Automated Remediation**: Self-healing for common security issues
- **π Security Scoring**: Clear visibility into security posture
## π΅οΈ Threat Detection & Investigation
Our threat detection and investigation capabilities combine multiple AWS security services to identify, analyze, and remediate security threats.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Threat Detection & Investigation"
A[π Threat<br>Detection] --> B[π΅οΈ GuardDuty]
A --> C[π Inspector]
B --> D[β οΈ Findings]
C --> D
D --> E[π Security Hub]
E --> F[π Detective]
F --> G[π Root Cause<br>Analysis]
F --> H[πΈοΈ Entity<br>Relationships]
F --> I[β±οΈ Timeline<br>Analysis]
G & H & I --> J[π₯ Security<br>Team]
J --> K[β‘ Incident<br>Response]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style D,E fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style G,H,I fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style J fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style K fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### GuardDuty Enhanced Capabilities
Amazon GuardDuty provides intelligent threat detection across multiple AWS services:
1. **π Machine Learning-Based Detection**:
- Analyzes CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, and DNS logs
- Identifies suspicious activity using ML models
- Detects reconnaissance, unauthorized access, and data exfiltration
2. **π° Service-Specific Protection**:
- **EKS Protection**: Monitors Kubernetes audit and runtime logs for threats
- **Lambda Protection**: Identifies suspicious serverless function activity
- **RDS Protection**: Detects database threats and anomalous access
- **S3 Protection**: Monitors for suspicious object storage activity
- **EC2 Malware Protection**: Scans for malware on EC2 instances
3. **π¨ Managed Threat Detection**:
- Regularly updated threat intelligence
- Detection of the latest attack techniques
- Minimal false positives through tuned ML models
### Amazon Detective
Amazon Detective provides powerful investigation capabilities for security incidents:
1. **π Root Cause Analysis**:
- Automatically collects and processes log data
- Builds a unified, interactive view of resource behaviors
- Visualizes relationships between AWS resources, IP addresses, and IAM principals
2. **β±οΈ Timeline Analysis**:
- Historical view of security events
- Context-rich visualization of activity
- Time-sequence analysis for understanding attack progression
3. **π Entity Relationship Mapping**:
- Interactive graph models for visual investigation
- Connection between resources, users, roles, and IP addresses
- Identification of lateral movement and privilege escalation
4. **π Behavioral Analytics**:
- Baseline resource behaviors over time
- Detection of anomalous behaviors
- Statistical analysis to reduce false positives
### Key Benefits
- **π Continuous Monitoring**: 24/7 automated threat detection
- **π Deep Visibility**: Comprehensive view across all AWS services
- **β‘ Rapid Investigation**: Streamlined security incident analysis
- **π Context-Rich Insights**: Detailed information for informed decisions
- **π¨ Proactive Alerts**: Early warning of potential security threats
## π Vulnerability Management
Our vulnerability management program combines Amazon Inspector with additional security practices to identify and remediate vulnerabilities across the infrastructure.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Vulnerability Management System"
A[π Vulnerability<br>Sources] --> B[π Amazon<br>Inspector]
A --> C[π οΈ Security<br>Scanners]
A --> D[π Security<br>Hub]
B --> E[π EC2<br>Vulnerabilities]
B --> F[π Container<br>Vulnerabilities]
B --> G[π Lambda<br>Vulnerabilities]
E & F & G --> H[π Vulnerability<br>Database]
H --> I[π Prioritization<br>Engine]
I --> J[π¨ Critical]
I --> K[β οΈ High]
I --> L[π Medium]
I --> M[βΉοΈ Low]
J & K --> N[π§ Immediate<br>Remediation]
L --> O[ποΈ Scheduled<br>Remediation]
N & O --> P[βοΈ Patch<br>Management]
P --> Q[β
Verification]
Q --> R[π Compliance<br>Reports]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C,D fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style E,F,G fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style H,I fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style J,K fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style L,M fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style N,O,P,Q,R fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Amazon Inspector Capabilities
Amazon Inspector provides comprehensive vulnerability assessment:
1. **π EC2 Instance Scanning**:
- Network accessibility assessment
- Operating system vulnerability assessment
- Agent-based and agentless scanning options
2. **π¦ Container Image Scanning**:
- ECR image scanning for vulnerabilities
- Detection of insecure container configurations
- Integration with CI/CD pipelines for shift-left security
3. **Ξ» Lambda Function Scanning**:
- **Code Scanning**: Analyzes function code for vulnerabilities
- **Standard Scanning**: Evaluates execution environment
- **Runtime Monitoring**: Detects issues during execution
4. **π Vulnerability Intelligence**:
- CVE database integration
- Exploit availability assessment
- Risk scoring based on severity and exploitability
### Vulnerability Remediation Process
Our structured approach to vulnerability management includes:
1. **π Continuous Scanning**:
- Automated scanning on a defined schedule
- Event-triggered scans for new deployments
- Continuous monitoring for newly discovered vulnerabilities
2. **π Risk-Based Prioritization**:
- CVSS score evaluation
- Exploitability assessment
- Asset criticality consideration
- Data sensitivity impact
3. **π§ Remediation Workflow**:
- Critical vulnerabilities addressed within 24 hours
- High vulnerabilities addressed within 7 days
- Medium vulnerabilities addressed within 30 days
- Low vulnerabilities addressed within 90 days
4. **β
Verification and Reporting**:
- Post-remediation validation scans
- Regular compliance reporting
- Trend analysis for vulnerability reduction
- Executive dashboards for security posture
### Key Benefits
- **π Comprehensive Coverage**: All computing resources protected
- **π Continuous Assessment**: Regular and event-driven scanning
- **π Risk-Based Approach**: Focus on the most critical vulnerabilities
- **βοΈ Automated Remediation**: Streamlined patching and mitigation
- **π Compliance Documentation**: Evidence for regulatory requirements
## β‘ Resilience & Operational Readiness
Our resilience and operational readiness strategy ensures the system can withstand disruptions and recover quickly from incidents.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Resilience & Operational Readiness"
A[ποΈ AWS Resilience<br>Hub] --> B[π Resilience<br>Assessment]
B --> C[π Resilience<br>Score]
C --> D[π Recovery Time<br>Objective]
C --> E[π Recovery Point<br>Objective]
F[π Resilience<br>Testing] --> G[π§ͺ Chaos<br>Engineering]
F --> H[π Failover<br>Testing]
F --> I[π¨ DR<br>Exercises]
J[β‘ Incident<br>Response] --> K[π Runbooks]
J --> L[π₯ Response<br>Teams]
J --> M[π Automated<br>Recovery]
N[π Business<br>Continuity] --> O[π Multi-AZ<br>Architecture]
N --> P[π Multi-Region<br>Strategy]
N --> Q[π Recovery<br>Plans]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D,E fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style F,J,N fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style G,H,I,K,L,M,O,P,Q fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### AWS Resilience Hub
AWS Resilience Hub provides a comprehensive framework for assessing and improving resilience:
1. **π Resilience Assessment**:
- Continuous evaluation of application resilience
- Identification of resilience gaps
- Recommendations for improving recovery capabilities
2. **β±οΈ Recovery Objectives**:
- Recovery Time Objective (RTO) validation
- Recovery Point Objective (RPO) validation
- Alignment with business requirements
3. **π Automated Testing**:
- Scheduled resilience test execution
- Validation of recovery procedures
- Verification of resilience configurations
4. **π Compliance Tracking**:
- Documentation of resilience capabilities
- Evidence for compliance requirements
- Detailed resilience reporting
### Resilience Testing Strategy
Our resilience testing program includes:
1. **π§ͺ Chaos Engineering**:
- Controlled fault injection
- Component failure simulation
- Network disruption testing
- Latency and error introduction
2. **π Failover Testing**:
- Database failover drills
- Redundant component verification
- Zone and region failover exercises
- Load balancer fail-open testing
3. **π¨ Disaster Recovery Exercises**:
- Full DR scenario simulations
- Recovery procedure validation
- Cross-region recovery testing
- Recovery time measurement
### Business Continuity Features
Our architecture includes multiple business continuity capabilities:
1. **π Multi-AZ Architecture**:
- Resources distributed across availability zones
- Automatic failover for critical components
- Zone-independent operation capability
2. **π Multi-Region Strategy**:
- Cross-region data replication
- Regional disaster recovery plans
- Global data residency compliance
3. **β‘ Automated Recovery**:
- Self-healing infrastructure
- Auto scaling for workload recovery
- Automated instance replacement
- Database point-in-time recovery
### Key Benefits
- **β‘ Improved Recovery**: Faster response to disruptions
- **π Comprehensive Assessment**: Clear visibility into resilience posture
- **π Validated Procedures**: Tested recovery mechanisms
- **π Documented Capabilities**: Evidence for auditors and stakeholders
- **π¨ Proactive Improvement**: Continuous enhancement of resilience
## π Configuration & Compliance Management
Our configuration and compliance management system ensures that all resources maintain secure configurations and adhere to regulatory requirements.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Configuration & Compliance Management"
A[βοΈ AWS Config] --> B[π Resource<br>Inventory]
A --> C[π Configuration<br>History]
A --> D[π Compliance<br>Rules]
D --> E[π AWS Managed<br>Rules]
D --> F[π Custom<br>Rules]
E & F --> G[π Continuous<br>Evaluation]
G --> H[β οΈ Non-Compliant<br>Resources]
H --> I[π Auto<br>Remediation]
J[ποΈ Compliance<br>Frameworks] --> K[π NIST CSF]
J --> L[π ISO 27001]
J --> M[π CIS Benchmarks]
K & L & M --> N[π Compliance<br>Reporting]
N --> O[ποΈ Executive<br>Dashboard]
N --> P[π Audit<br>Evidence]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C,D fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style E,F fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style G,H,I fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style J,K,L,M fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style N,O,P fill:#00E676,stroke:#00C853,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### AWS Config Capabilities
AWS Config provides comprehensive configuration management:
1. **π Resource Inventory**:
- Detailed inventory of all AWS resources
- Configuration details and relationships
- Historical configuration tracking
2. **π Configuration Recording**:
- Continuous configuration state capture
- Configuration change history
- Point-in-time configuration views
3. **π Compliance Evaluation**:
- Built-in rule library for common controls
- Custom rule development for specific requirements
- Automated evaluation and notification
4. **π Configuration Remediation**:
- Automated remediation actions
- Integration with AWS Systems Manager
- Compliance status tracking and reporting
### Compliance Framework Integration
Our system maps to multiple compliance frameworks:
1. **ποΈ NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)**:
- Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover functions
- Control mapping for all CSF categories
- Evidence collection for CSF compliance
2. **π ISO 27001**:
- Control implementation for all relevant domains
- Documentation for certification requirements
- Continuous monitoring for control effectiveness
3. **π‘οΈ CIS Benchmarks**:
- Implementation of CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark
- Operating system-level CIS compliance
- Database configuration security benchmarks
### Key Benefits
- **π Complete Visibility**: Comprehensive view of resource configurations
- **π Historical Tracking**: Configuration changes over time
- **π Automated Compliance**: Continuous evaluation against requirements
- **β‘ Rapid Remediation**: Automated fixing of compliance issues
- **π Evidence Collection**: Documentation for audits and assessments
## π Monitoring & Analytics
Our comprehensive monitoring and analytics system provides real-time visibility into security status and enables rapid response to incidents.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Security Monitoring & Analytics"
A[π Log Sources] --> B[π CloudWatch]
A --> C[π VPC Flow Logs]
A --> D[π CloudTrail]
A --> E[π Application Logs]
B & C & D & E --> F[π Security Lake]
F --> G[π Normalized<br>OCSF Format]
G --> H[π Security<br>Analytics]
H --> I[π¨ Real-time<br>Alerting]
H --> J[π Threat<br>Hunting]
H --> K[π Trend<br>Analysis]
L[π Reporting] --> M[π Executive<br>Dashboards]
L --> N[π Compliance<br>Reports]
L --> O[π Incident<br>Analysis]
end
style A,B,C,D,E fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F,G fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style H,I,J,K fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style L,M,N,O fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### AWS Security Lake
AWS Security Lake provides centralized security log management:
1. **π Centralized Collection**:
- Automatic gathering of logs from AWS services
- Collection from on-premises sources
- Third-party integration for comprehensive visibility
2. **π OCSF Normalization**:
- Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework (OCSF) standardization
- Consistent format for all security data
- Simplified analysis across diverse sources
3. **π Long-term Storage**:
- Cost-effective retention of security data
- Lifecycle management for compliance requirements
- Data sovereignty controls for regulatory compliance
4. **π Advanced Analytics**:
- Built-in query capabilities for investigation
- Integration with analytics services
- Third-party SIEM integration options
### Security Analytics Capabilities
Our security analytics platform provides:
1. **π¨ Real-time Detection**:
- Continuous monitoring for security events
- Pattern matching for known threats
- Anomaly detection for unknown threats
2. **π Threat Hunting**:
- Interactive query capabilities
- Advanced visualization for pattern discovery
- Hypothesis testing for threat identification
3. **π Trend Analysis**:
- Historical security data analysis
- Identification of emerging threats
- Risk prediction based on historical patterns
4. **π Security Metrics**:
- Key performance indicators for security
- Security posture visualization
- Improvement tracking over time
### Key Benefits
- **ποΈ Unified Visibility**: Comprehensive view across all environments
- **β‘ Rapid Detection**: Quick identification of security issues
- **π Deep Analysis**: Advanced tools for security investigation
- **π Simplified Compliance**: Streamlined reporting for audits
- **π Strategic Insights**: Data-driven security decision making
## π€ Automated Security Operations
Our automated security maintenance system ensures continuous protection through programmatic security operations.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "Automated Security Maintenance"
A[β±οΈ Maintenance<br>Window] --> B[π Automated<br>Operations]
B --> C[π Security<br>Scanning]
B --> D[π οΈ Patch<br>Management]
B --> E[π Agent<br>Updates]
B --> F[π Inventory<br>Collection]
C --> G[π Findings]
D --> H[π Compliance<br>Status]
G & H --> I[π¦ S3 Artifact<br>Storage]
end
style A fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style B fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style C,D,E,F fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style G,H fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style I fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### AWS Systems Manager Maintenance Window
The CloudFormation template defines a comprehensive maintenance window for automated security operations:
```json
"MaintenanceWindow": {
"Type": "AWS::SSM::MaintenanceWindow",
"Properties": {
"Description": "Daily Maintenance Window",
"AllowUnassociatedTargets": false,
"Cutoff": 0,
"Schedule": "rate(1 hour)",
"Duration": 1,
"Name": "hourly-patching"
}
}
```
This configuration ensures regular, automated security maintenance:
- Hourly execution schedule
- Defined maintenance window
- Controlled target selection via tags
- Automated output logging
### Automation Components
- **β±οΈ Scheduled Maintenance**: Regular security operations on defined schedules
- **π οΈ Patch Management**: Automated security patch deployment and validation
- **π Agent Updates**: SSM agent and security tool updates
- **π Inventory Tracking**: Software and configuration monitoring
- **π Compliance Verification**: Automated checks against security baselines
## π Application Security
Our application implements robust security controls at the code level.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph "Application Security Controls"
A[π‘οΈ Spring<br>Security] --> B[π Authentication]
A --> C[π Authorization]
A --> D[π Headers]
A --> E[π Input<br>Validation]
B --> F[π€ MFA]
B --> G[π« Brute Force<br>Protection]
C --> H[π Role-Based<br>Access]
C --> I[π Method<br>Security]
D --> J[π Content<br>Security]
D --> K[π HSTS]
end
style A fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C,D,E fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style F,G fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style H,I fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style J,K fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Method-Level Security Implementation
The application implements `@Secured` annotations for fine-grained access control:
```java
@Secured({ "ROLE_USER", "ROLE_ADMIN" })
public DataContainer<UserAccount> getUserAccountByEmail(ServiceRequest serviceRequest) {
// Implementation details...
}
@Secured({ "ROLE_ADMIN" })
public ServiceResponse updateApplicationConfiguration(ServiceRequest serviceRequest) {
// Implementation details...
}
```
Each secured method enforces specific role requirements:
- `ROLE_ANONYMOUS`: Unauthenticated access (limited functionality)
- `ROLE_USER`: Standard authenticated user access
- `ROLE_ADMIN`: Administrative privileges for sensitive operations
### Application Security Features
- **π‘οΈ Spring Security Framework**: Enterprise-grade security integration
- **π Authentication**: Multi-factor and password-based with BCrypt hashing
- **π Role-Based Access Control**: Fine-grained authorization with method annotations
- **π Security Headers**: CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy
- **π Input Validation**: Both client and server-side validation
## π Compliance Framework
Our security architecture aligns with key compliance frameworks.
```mermaid
graph TD
subgraph "Compliance Integration"
A[ποΈ Compliance<br>Framework] --> B[π NIST CSF]
A --> C[π ISO 27001]
B --> D[ποΈ Identify]
B --> E[π‘οΈ Protect]
B --> F[π Detect]
B --> G[β‘ Respond]
B --> H[π Recover]
C --> I[π₯ Access<br>Control]
C --> J[π Cryptography]
C --> K[βοΈ Operations]
C --> L[π‘ Communications]
end
style A fill:#673AB7,stroke:#311B92,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style D,E,F,G,H fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style I,J,K,L fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
## π‘οΈ Defense-in-Depth Strategy
Our defense-in-depth strategy coordinates the multiple security layers already implemented throughout the Citizen Intelligence Agency platform to create overlapping protection mechanisms.
### Strategic Implementation
The defense-in-depth approach manifests through several implemented layers of protection:
1. **Identity Security Layer**: The documented MFA with Google Authenticator, login blocking protection, and role-based access control create the first line of defense.
2. **Application Security Layer**: Our implemented Spring Security framework with method-level `@Secured` annotations provides protection at the code level.
3. **Data Security Layer**: The Javers auditing system, combined with encryption via KMS and end-to-end TLS create a comprehensive data protection layer.
4. **Network Security Layer**: Our AWS WAF implementation, three-zone network segmentation, and VPC Endpoints establish network boundaries and traffic filtering.
5. **Infrastructure Security Layer**: Multi-AZ architecture, AWS security services, and automated security maintenance via AWS Systems Manager provide foundational protection.
6. **Monitoring & Detection Layer**: The implemented ApplicationSession tracking, security event listeners, GuardDuty, and Inspector provide visibility across all layers.
This integration of multiple security controls means that a compromise of any single layer will not lead to a complete security failure, as additional protective measures exist at each level of the technology stack.
## π Security Operations
Our security operations framework orchestrates the ongoing management of the security controls implemented throughout our architecture.
### Operational Functions
The security operations activities leverage our implemented systems:
1. **Continuous Monitoring**: Using the implemented security event monitoring system and ApplicationActionEvent tracking to maintain visibility into security-relevant activities.
2. **Threat Detection & Response**: Operationalizing the implemented GuardDuty service with its machine learning capabilities and multiple AWS service protections.
3. **Vulnerability Management**: Operating the Amazon Inspector implementation to identify and remediate vulnerabilities across EC2, container images, and Lambda functions.
4. **Configuration Management**: Utilizing AWS Config to ensure secure configurations are maintained and compliance rules are enforced.
5. **Automated Security Maintenance**: Executing regular security operations through the implemented AWS Systems Manager Maintenance Windows, which run on the documented hourly schedule.
6. **Log Management & Analysis**: Leveraging Security Lake's OCSF standardization for security data analysis across the environment.
These operational activities ensure that the security controls documented throughout this architecture remain effective on an ongoing basis.
## π° Security Investment
Our security investment approach focuses on the maintenance and optimization of the implemented security controls documented in this architecture.
### Investment Priorities
Based on the security implementation described throughout this document, our investment focuses on:
1. **AWS Security Services**: Funding the AWS security services already implemented including WAF, GuardDuty with its enhanced capabilities, Inspector, Security Hub, Detective, Config, and Security Lake.
2. **High Availability Infrastructure**: Supporting the multi-AZ architecture with redundant components as documented in the High Availability Design section.
3. **Authentication & Authorization**: Maintaining the implemented multi-factor authentication system and role-based access control framework.
4. **Operational Security**: Supporting the automated security operations through the implemented maintenance window and security event monitoring.
5. **Compliance Management**: Resources for maintaining the implemented compliance controls mapped to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and CIS Benchmarks.
For detailed cost breakdowns of the AWS security implementation, refer to the [Financial Security Plan](FinancialSecurityPlan.md) referenced in our Security Documentation Map.
## ποΈ AWS Well-Architected Alignment
Our security architecture aligns with the AWS Well-Architected Framework pillars, ensuring that security best practices are implemented across all aspects of the system.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
subgraph "AWS Well-Architected Framework"
A[ποΈ Well-Architected<br>Framework]
A --> B[π Security]
A --> C[πͺ Reliability]
A --> D[βοΈ Operational<br>Excellence]
A --> E[π Performance<br>Efficiency]
A --> F[π° Cost<br>Optimization]
A --> G[β»οΈ Sustainability]
B --> B1[π Identity & Access<br>Management]
B --> B2[π Detection<br>Controls]
B --> B3[π‘οΈ Infrastructure<br>Protection]
B --> B4[π Data<br>Protection]
B --> B5[β‘ Incident<br>Response]
B1 --> H1[π MFA & RBAC]
B1 --> H2[π₯ IAM Best<br>Practices]
B2 --> I1[π΅οΈ GuardDuty]
B2 --> I2[π Security Hub]
B2 --> I3[π Application<br>Action Tracking]
B3 --> J1[π§± WAF]
B3 --> J2[π Network<br>Segmentation]
B3 --> J3[π VPC<br>Endpoints]
B4 --> K1[π Encryption]
B4 --> K2[π Javers<br>Auditing]
B4 --> K3[ποΈ Secrets<br>Manager]
B5 --> L1[π Detective]
B5 --> L2[βοΈ Automated<br>Remediation]
C --> C1[ποΈ Multi-AZ<br>Architecture]
C --> C2[π AWS<br>Resilience Hub]
D --> D1[π€ Automated<br>Security Ops]
D --> D2[π Config<br>Management]
E --> E1[π Private<br>Endpoints]
E --> E2[π Service<br>Optimizations]
F --> F1[π Right-Sized<br>Controls]
G --> G1[β»οΈ Resource<br>Efficiency]
end
style A fill:#2979FF,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B,C,D,E,F,G fill:#00C853,stroke:#007E33,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
style B1,B2,B3,B4,B5,C1,C2,D1,D2,E1,E2,F1,G1 fill:#FFD600,stroke:#FF8F00,stroke-width:2px,color:black,font-weight:bold
style H1,H2,I1,I2,I3,J1,J2,J3,K1,K2,K3,L1,L2 fill:#FF3D00,stroke:#BF360C,stroke-width:2px,color:white,font-weight:bold
classDef default font-weight:bold
```
### Security Pillar Implementation
Our security architecture most directly addresses the AWS Security pillar through:
1. **π Identity & Access Management**
- Multi-factor authentication with Google Authenticator
- Role-based access control with three security tiers
- Method-level security with `@Secured` annotations
- IAM best practices (IAM.1-8) as documented in AWS Foundational Security Best Practices
2. **π Detection Controls**
- GuardDuty with enhanced capabilities for EKS, Lambda, RDS, S3, and EC2
- Security Hub for centralized security findings
- ApplicationSession and ApplicationActionEvent tracking
- Security event monitoring with event listeners
3. **π‘οΈ Infrastructure Protection**
- AWS WAF implementation against OWASP Top 10
- Three-zone network segmentation (public, private app, private DB)
- VPC Endpoints for private AWS service access
- Security Groups and NACLs for traffic filtering
4. **π Data Protection**
- End-to-end encryption with TLS
- KMS encryption for data at rest
- Secrets Manager with automated rotation
- Javers auditing for data integrity
5. **β‘ Incident Response**
- Amazon Detective for investigation capabilities
- Automated remediation through AWS Systems Manager
### Cross-Pillar Security Benefits
Our security architecture also supports other Well-Architected pillars:
1. **πͺ Reliability**
- Multi-AZ architecture enhances both security and availability
- AWS Resilience Hub assessments and testing
2. **βοΈ Operational Excellence**
- Automated security operations through maintenance windows
- Configuration management with AWS Config
3. **π Performance Efficiency**
- VPC Endpoints improve security while enhancing performance
- Security controls designed to minimize performance impact
4. **π° Cost Optimization**
- Risk-based approach to security ensures appropriate investment levels
- Automated operations reduce security maintenance costs
5. **β»οΈ Sustainability**
- Efficient security resource usage through automation
- Right-sized security controls designed for minimal resource consumption
## π Conclusion
The Citizen Intelligence Agency security architecture establishes a comprehensive security framework through the implementation of multiple protective layers and controls.
### Security Foundation
The implemented security architecture includes:
1. **Strong Authentication**: Multi-factor authentication and sophisticated login blocking mechanisms
2. **Detailed Auditing**: Comprehensive data change tracking via Javers and user activity monitoring
3. **Network Protection**: Multi-layer network security with AWS WAF and segmentation
4. **Data Security**: End-to-end encryption and secure data storage
5. **Threat Detection**: GuardDuty implementation with extended protection capabilities
6. **Vulnerability Management**: Amazon Inspector scanning across multiple resource types
7. **Automated Operations**: Systems Manager maintenance windows for consistent security
8. **Resilient Design**: Multi-AZ architecture for security and availability
This implemented security foundation positions the Citizen Intelligence Agency platform to fulfill its mission of providing transparency and political data analysis while maintaining appropriate protection for sensitive information.
For information on future security enhancements, refer to the [π Future Security Architecture](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) document.
---
**π Document Control:**
**β
Approved by:** James Pether SΓΆrling, CEO - Hack23 AB
**π€ Distribution:** Public
**π·οΈ Classification:** [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md#confidentiality-levels) [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md#integrity-levels) [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md#availability-levels)
**π
Effective Date:** 2025-09-18
**β° Next Review:** 2026-09-18
**π― Framework Compliance:** [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md) [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md) [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md) [](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md)
|