|
|
|
|
|
First_response = """ |
|
|
Four people identified in the video. Please select the people you want to analyse: |
|
|
""" |
|
|
Second_response="""Let’s confirm the learning goals:""" |
|
|
|
|
|
non_verbal_options = [ |
|
|
"Following directions", |
|
|
"On-task percentage", |
|
|
"Elopement attempts", |
|
|
"Falling response", |
|
|
"Overwhelm indicators", |
|
|
"Avoidance behaviors", |
|
|
"Harm attempts", |
|
|
"Eye contact percentage", |
|
|
"Eye contact duration", |
|
|
"Body language", |
|
|
"Stimming behaviors", |
|
|
"Attention tracking", |
|
|
"Whole-body listening", |
|
|
"Gaze tracking", |
|
|
"Inappropriate touching", |
|
|
"Listening behaviors", |
|
|
"Noises or gestures" |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
verbal_options = [ |
|
|
"Target sounds", |
|
|
"Word position", |
|
|
"Sound substitutions", |
|
|
"Articulation frequency", |
|
|
"Mean Length of Utterance (MLU)", |
|
|
"Disfluencies", |
|
|
"Questions asked", |
|
|
"Student answers", |
|
|
"Response time", |
|
|
"Peer responses", |
|
|
"On-topic responses", |
|
|
"Correct response ratio", |
|
|
"Cues needed", |
|
|
"Pragmatic skills", |
|
|
"Conversation volume", |
|
|
"Initiating conversation", |
|
|
"Interruptions", |
|
|
"Following directions", |
|
|
"Answering questions", |
|
|
"Idioms/sarcasm", |
|
|
"Grammar and syntax", |
|
|
"Vocabulary use", |
|
|
"Answering wh-questions" |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
environmental_options = [ |
|
|
"External noises", |
|
|
"Room activity", |
|
|
"Room temperature", |
|
|
"Fluorescent lights", |
|
|
"School vs home", |
|
|
"Session location", |
|
|
"Furniture size", |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
client_options=[ |
|
|
"David", |
|
|
"John", |
|
|
"Sam", |
|
|
"Mike", |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
data_insights = """ |
|
|
- On 9/17, Mike seemed to be distracted by the lighting in the room, which could be the reason he had more approximate words than correct words. |
|
|
- On 9/18, there was a level of outside noise present during the session due to weather. This was also where Mike’s incorrect words were at their highest. |
|
|
- On 9/19, Mike performed the best he has yet! |
|
|
- Between 9/20 - 9/22, Mike's approximate words have tapered out. |
|
|
""" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subjective_report = """ |
|
|
Mike exhibited signs of stress at the start of the session due to the rainy weather, but he maintained engagement and participation throughout. |
|
|
""" |
|
|
|
|
|
objective_report = """ |
|
|
- Number of Answers Given: This child named one of the characters in the story as 'Bob.' |
|
|
- Cues Required: Responded directly to the SLP’s prompt without requiring additional cues. |
|
|
- Observed Behavior: Participation in the naming process indicates engagement, though the child's involvement appears less proactive compared to the middle child. |
|
|
'Wh' Questions Addressed: Answered a 'who' question by providing a name for a character. |
|
|
- Grammar and Complexity: The response was simple but appropriate for the task at hand. |
|
|
- Visual Cues Used: It's not clear from the transcript if the child used visual cues, but the direct response to the SLP's question suggests attentiveness to verbal cues. |
|
|
""" |
|
|
|
|
|
assessment_report = """ |
|
|
His ability to produce /er/ words when presented with a phonemic cue has also improved from only making 20% of words in yesterday’s session. |
|
|
""" |
|
|
|
|
|
plan_report = """ |
|
|
|
|
|
""" |
|
|
|
