Spaces:
Build error
Build error
Update app.py
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# app.py
|
| 2 |
-
# @title Beer Game Final Version (
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
# 1. Import Libraries
|
|
@@ -35,10 +35,7 @@ INITIAL_BACKLOG = 0
|
|
| 35 |
ORDER_PASSING_DELAY = 1 # Handled by last_week_orders
|
| 36 |
SHIPPING_DELAY = 2 # General shipping delay (R->W, W->D)
|
| 37 |
FACTORY_LEAD_TIME = 1
|
| 38 |
-
#
|
| 39 |
-
# This MUST be 1 for LT=3. (Order W1 -> F Rec W2 -> F Prod W2 -> F Fin W3 -> F Ship W3 -> D Rec W4)
|
| 40 |
-
FACTORY_SHIPPING_DELAY = 1
|
| 41 |
-
# ----------------------------------------------------
|
| 42 |
HOLDING_COST = 0.5
|
| 43 |
BACKLOG_COST = 1.0
|
| 44 |
|
|
@@ -89,12 +86,9 @@ def init_game_state(llm_personality: str, info_sharing: str, participant_id: str
|
|
| 89 |
for i, name in enumerate(roles):
|
| 90 |
upstream = roles[i + 1] if i + 1 < len(roles) else None
|
| 91 |
downstream = roles[i - 1] if i - 1 >= 0 else None
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
# USE THE CORRECT DELAY
|
| 94 |
-
if name == "Distributor": shipping_weeks = FACTORY_SHIPPING_DELAY # This is 1
|
| 95 |
elif name == "Factory": shipping_weeks = 0
|
| 96 |
-
else: shipping_weeks = SHIPPING_DELAY
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
st.session_state.game_state['echelons'][name] = {
|
| 99 |
'name': name, 'inventory': INITIAL_INVENTORY, 'backlog': INITIAL_BACKLOG,
|
| 100 |
'incoming_shipments': deque([0] * shipping_weeks, maxlen=shipping_weeks),
|
|
@@ -127,31 +121,21 @@ def get_llm_order_decision(prompt: str, echelon_name: str) -> (int, str):
|
|
| 127 |
st.error(f"API call failed for {echelon_name}: {e}. Defaulting to 4.")
|
| 128 |
return 4, f"API_ERROR: {e}"
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
-
# =============== PROMPT FUNCTION (v3 - Sterman Heuristic + Demand Fix) ===============
|
| 131 |
def get_llm_prompt(echelon_state_decision_point: dict, week: int, llm_personality: str, info_sharing: str, all_echelons_state_decision_point: dict) -> str:
|
| 132 |
-
# This function's logic
|
| 133 |
e_state = echelon_state_decision_point
|
| 134 |
base_info = f"Your Current Status at the **{e_state['name']}** for **Week {week}** (Before Shipping):\n- On-hand inventory: {e_state['inventory']} units.\n- Backlog (total unfilled orders): {e_state['backlog']} units.\n- Incoming order this week (just received): {e_state['incoming_order']} units.\n"
|
| 135 |
-
|
| 136 |
-
# --- PROMPT FIX: Get correct demand (current, not future) ---
|
| 137 |
-
current_stable_demand = get_customer_demand(week) # Use current week's demand
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
if e_state['name'] == 'Factory':
|
| 140 |
task_word = "production quantity"
|
| 141 |
base_info += f"- Your Production Pipeline (completing next week onwards): {list(st.session_state.game_state['factory_production_pipeline'])}"
|
| 142 |
else:
|
| 143 |
task_word = "order quantity"
|
| 144 |
base_info += f"- Shipments In Transit To You (arriving next week onwards): {list(e_state['incoming_shipments'])}"
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
# --- PERFECT RATIONAL (NORMATIVE) PROMPTS ---
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
if llm_personality == 'perfect_rational' and info_sharing == 'full':
|
| 149 |
-
stable_demand =
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
else: total_lead_time = ORDER_PASSING_DELAY + SHIPPING_DELAY # 1+2 = 3
|
| 154 |
-
# ----------------------------------------------------
|
| 155 |
safety_stock = 4
|
| 156 |
target_inventory_level = (stable_demand * total_lead_time) + safety_stock
|
| 157 |
if e_state['name'] == 'Factory':
|
|
@@ -163,7 +147,6 @@ def get_llm_prompt(echelon_state_decision_point: dict, week: int, llm_personalit
|
|
| 163 |
inv_pos_components = f"(Inv={e_state['inventory']} - Backlog={e_state['backlog']} + InTransitShip={sum(e_state['incoming_shipments'])} + OrderToSupplier={order_in_transit_to_supplier})"
|
| 164 |
optimal_order = max(0, int(target_inventory_level - inventory_position))
|
| 165 |
return f"**You are a perfectly rational supply chain AI with full system visibility.**\nYour only goal is to maintain stability and minimize costs based on mathematical optimization.\n**System Analysis:**\n* **Known Stable End-Customer Demand:** {stable_demand} units/week.\n* **Your Current Total Inventory Position:** {inventory_position} units. {inv_pos_components}\n* **Optimal Target Inventory Level:** {target_inventory_level} units (Target for {total_lead_time} weeks lead time).\n* **Mathematically Optimal {task_word.title()}:** The optimal decision is **{optimal_order} units**.\n**Your Task:** Confirm this optimal {task_word}. Respond with a single integer."
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
elif llm_personality == 'perfect_rational' and info_sharing == 'local':
|
| 168 |
safety_stock = 4; anchor_demand = e_state['incoming_order']
|
| 169 |
inventory_correction = safety_stock - (e_state['inventory'] - e_state['backlog'])
|
|
@@ -177,82 +160,32 @@ def get_llm_prompt(echelon_state_decision_point: dict, week: int, llm_personalit
|
|
| 177 |
calculated_order = anchor_demand + inventory_correction - supply_line
|
| 178 |
rational_local_order = max(0, int(calculated_order))
|
| 179 |
return f"**You are a perfectly rational supply chain AI with ONLY LOCAL information.**\nYou must use a logical heuristic to make a stable decision. A proven method is \"Anchoring and Adjustment\".\n\n{base_info}\n\n**Rational Calculation (Anchoring & Adjustment):**\n1. **Anchor on Demand:** Your best guess for future demand is your last incoming order: **{anchor_demand} units**.\n2. **Adjust for Inventory:** You want to hold a safety stock of {safety_stock} units. Your current stock (before shipping) is {e_state['inventory'] - e_state['backlog']}. You need to order an extra **{inventory_correction} units** to correct this.\n3. **Account for {supply_line_desc}:** You already have **{supply_line} units** being processed. These should be subtracted from your new decision.\n\n**Final Calculation:**\n* Decision = (Anchor Demand) + (Inventory Adjustment) - ({supply_line_desc})\n* Decision = {anchor_demand} + {inventory_correction} - {supply_line} = **{rational_local_order} units**.\n**Your Task:** Confirm this locally rational {task_word}. Respond with a single integer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
-
# --- HUMAN-LIKE (DESCRIPTIVE) PROMPTS ---
|
| 182 |
-
# (These are NEW and implement a flawed, panicky Sterman-style heuristic)
|
| 183 |
-
|
| 184 |
-
else: # Catches both 'human_like' / 'local' and 'human_like' / 'full'
|
| 185 |
-
|
| 186 |
-
# This is the flawed Sterman heuristic
|
| 187 |
-
DESIRED_INVENTORY = 12 # Matches initial inventory
|
| 188 |
-
anchor_demand = e_state['incoming_order']
|
| 189 |
-
net_inventory = e_state['inventory'] - e_state['backlog']
|
| 190 |
-
stock_correction = DESIRED_INVENTORY - net_inventory
|
| 191 |
-
panicky_order = max(0, int(anchor_demand + stock_correction))
|
| 192 |
-
panicky_order_calc = f"{anchor_demand} (Your Incoming Order) + {stock_correction} (Your Stock Correction)"
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
-
# Get supply line info *just to show* the AI it's being ignored
|
| 195 |
-
if e_state['name'] == 'Factory':
|
| 196 |
-
supply_line = sum(st.session_state.game_state['factory_production_pipeline'])
|
| 197 |
-
supply_line_desc = "In Production"
|
| 198 |
-
else:
|
| 199 |
-
order_in_transit_to_supplier = st.session_state.game_state['last_week_orders'].get(e_state['name'], 0)
|
| 200 |
-
supply_line = sum(e_state['incoming_shipments']) + order_in_transit_to_supplier
|
| 201 |
-
supply_line_desc = "Supply Line"
|
| 202 |
-
|
| 203 |
-
if info_sharing == 'local':
|
| 204 |
-
return f"""
|
| 205 |
-
**You are a reactive supply chain manager for the {e_state['name']}.** You have a limited (local) view.
|
| 206 |
-
You tend to make **reactive, 'gut-instinct' decisions** (like the classic Sterman 1989 model) that cause the Bullwhip Effect.
|
| 207 |
-
|
| 208 |
-
{base_info}
|
| 209 |
-
|
| 210 |
-
**Your Flawed 'Human' Heuristic:**
|
| 211 |
-
Your gut tells you to fix your entire inventory problem *right now*, and you're afraid of your backlog.
|
| 212 |
-
A 'rational' player would account for their {supply_line_desc} (which is {supply_line} units), but you're too busy panicking to trust that.
|
| 213 |
-
|
| 214 |
-
**Your 'Panic' Calculation (Ignoring the Supply Line):**
|
| 215 |
-
1. **Anchor on Demand:** You just got an order for **{anchor_demand}** units. You'll order *at least* that.
|
| 216 |
-
2. **Correct for Stock:** Your desired 'safe' inventory is {DESIRED_INVENTORY}. Your current net inventory is {net_inventory}. You need to order **{stock_correction}** more units to feel safe again.
|
| 217 |
-
3. **Ignore Supply Line:** You'll ignore the **{supply_line} units** already in your pipeline.
|
| 218 |
-
|
| 219 |
-
**Final Panic Order:** (Your Incoming Order) + (Your Stock Correction)
|
| 220 |
-
* Order = {panicky_order_calc} = **{panicky_order} units**.
|
| 221 |
-
|
| 222 |
-
**Your Task:** Confirm this 'gut-instinct' {task_word}. Respond with a single integer.
|
| 223 |
-
"""
|
| 224 |
-
|
| 225 |
-
elif info_sharing == 'full':
|
| 226 |
-
# Build the "Full Info" string just for context
|
| 227 |
-
full_info_str = f"\n**Full Supply Chain Information (State Before Shipping):**\n- End-Customer Demand this week: {current_stable_demand} units.\n"
|
| 228 |
-
for name, other_e_state in all_echelons_state_decision_point.items():
|
| 229 |
-
if name != e_state['name']: full_info_str += f"- {name}: Inv={other_e_state['inventory']}, Backlog={other_e_state['backlog']}\n"
|
| 230 |
-
|
| 231 |
-
return f"""
|
| 232 |
-
**You are a supply chain manager ({e_state['name']}) with full system visibility.**
|
| 233 |
-
{base_info}
|
| 234 |
-
{full_info_str}
|
| 235 |
-
|
| 236 |
-
**A "Human-like" Flawed Decision:**
|
| 237 |
-
Even though you have full information, you are judged by *your own* performance (your inventory, your backlog).
|
| 238 |
-
You tend to react to your *local* situation (like the classic Sterman 1989 model) instead of using the complex full-system data.
|
| 239 |
-
A 'rational' player would use the end-customer demand ({current_stable_demand}) and account for the *entire* system, but your gut-instinct is to panic about *your* numbers.
|
| 240 |
-
|
| 241 |
-
**Your 'Panic' Calculation (Ignoring Full Info and Your Supply Line):**
|
| 242 |
-
1. **Anchor on *Your* Demand:** You just got an order for **{anchor_demand}** units. You react to this, not the end-customer demand.
|
| 243 |
-
2. **Correct for *Your* Stock:** Your desired 'safe' inventory is {DESIRED_INVENTORY}. Your current net inventory is {net_inventory}. You need to order **{stock_correction}** more units.
|
| 244 |
-
3. **Ignore *Your* Supply Line:** You'll ignore the **{supply_line} units** in your own pipeline ({supply_line_desc}).
|
| 245 |
-
|
| 246 |
-
**Final Panic Order:** (Your Incoming Order) + (Your Stock Correction)
|
| 247 |
-
* Order = {panicky_order_calc} = **{panicky_order} units**.
|
| 248 |
-
|
| 249 |
-
**Your Task:** Confirm this 'gut-instinct', locally-focused {task_word}. Respond with a single integer.
|
| 250 |
-
"""
|
| 251 |
-
# =========================================================
|
| 252 |
-
|
| 253 |
-
# =============== STEP_GAME (v8) - Stable Logic + Correct Log Fix ===============
|
| 254 |
def step_game(human_final_order: int, human_initial_order: int, ai_suggestion: int):
|
| 255 |
-
# This
|
| 256 |
state = st.session_state.game_state
|
| 257 |
week, echelons, human_role = state['week'], state['echelons'], state['human_role']
|
| 258 |
llm_personality, info_sharing = state['llm_personality'], state['info_sharing']
|
|
@@ -263,54 +196,51 @@ def step_game(human_final_order: int, human_initial_order: int, ai_suggestion: i
|
|
| 263 |
opening_inventories = {name: e['inventory'] for name, e in echelons.items()}
|
| 264 |
opening_backlogs = {name: e['backlog'] for name, e in echelons.items()}
|
| 265 |
|
| 266 |
-
# --- LOG FIX (
|
| 267 |
-
|
| 268 |
-
|
| 269 |
-
|
| 270 |
|
| 271 |
-
# Factory
|
|
|
|
| 272 |
if factory_q:
|
| 273 |
-
|
| 274 |
-
|
| 275 |
-
|
| 276 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 277 |
for name in ["Retailer", "Wholesaler", "Distributor"]:
|
| 278 |
shipment_q = echelons[name]['incoming_shipments']
|
| 279 |
if shipment_q:
|
| 280 |
-
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 |
-
# This logic MUST match the UI logic
|
| 283 |
if name == 'Distributor':
|
| 284 |
-
# "Next" for Distributor is what's
|
| 285 |
if factory_q:
|
| 286 |
-
|
| 287 |
elif name in ("Retailer", "Wholesaler"):
|
| 288 |
-
|
| 289 |
-
|
| 290 |
-
|
| 291 |
-
|
| 292 |
-
|
| 293 |
|
| 294 |
-
#
|
| 295 |
-
# This block is separate from the logging block above.
|
| 296 |
-
# It uses its *own* variables to run the game.
|
| 297 |
-
arrived_this_week_GAME = {name: 0 for name in echelon_order} # Use a fresh dict for game logic
|
| 298 |
inventory_after_arrival = {}
|
| 299 |
factory_state = echelons["Factory"]
|
| 300 |
produced_units = 0
|
| 301 |
if state['factory_production_pipeline']:
|
| 302 |
-
produced_units = state['factory_production_pipeline'].popleft()
|
| 303 |
-
arrived_this_week_GAME["Factory"] = produced_units
|
| 304 |
inventory_after_arrival["Factory"] = factory_state['inventory'] + produced_units
|
| 305 |
|
| 306 |
for name in ["Retailer", "Wholesaler", "Distributor"]:
|
| 307 |
arrived_shipment = 0
|
| 308 |
if echelons[name]['incoming_shipments']:
|
| 309 |
-
arrived_shipment = echelons[name]['incoming_shipments'].popleft()
|
| 310 |
-
arrived_this_week_GAME[name] = arrived_shipment
|
| 311 |
inventory_after_arrival[name] = echelons[name]['inventory'] + arrived_shipment
|
| 312 |
-
|
| 313 |
-
|
| 314 |
total_backlog_before_shipping = {}
|
| 315 |
for name in echelon_order:
|
| 316 |
incoming_order_for_this_week = 0
|
|
@@ -325,7 +255,7 @@ def step_game(human_final_order: int, human_initial_order: int, ai_suggestion: i
|
|
| 325 |
decision_point_states[name] = {
|
| 326 |
'name': name, 'inventory': inventory_after_arrival[name],
|
| 327 |
'backlog': total_backlog_before_shipping[name], 'incoming_order': echelons[name]['incoming_order'],
|
| 328 |
-
'incoming_shipments': echelons[name]['incoming_shipments'].copy() if name != "Factory" else deque()
|
| 329 |
}
|
| 330 |
current_week_orders = {}
|
| 331 |
for name in echelon_order:
|
|
@@ -354,24 +284,22 @@ def step_game(human_final_order: int, human_initial_order: int, ai_suggestion: i
|
|
| 354 |
for key in ['inventory', 'backlog', 'incoming_order', 'order_placed', 'shipment_sent', 'weekly_cost', 'total_cost']: log_entry[f'{name}.{key}'] = e[key]
|
| 355 |
log_entry[f'{name}.llm_raw_response'] = llm_raw_responses.get(name, "")
|
| 356 |
|
| 357 |
-
# --- LOG FIX (
|
| 358 |
log_entry[f'{name}.opening_inventory'] = opening_inventories[name]
|
| 359 |
log_entry[f'{name}.opening_backlog'] = opening_backlogs[name]
|
| 360 |
-
log_entry[f'{name}.arrived_this_week'] =
|
| 361 |
|
| 362 |
if name != 'Factory':
|
| 363 |
-
log_entry[f'{name}.arriving_next_week'] =
|
| 364 |
else:
|
| 365 |
-
log_entry[f'{name}.production_completing_next_week'] =
|
| 366 |
-
# --- END OF LOG FIX (
|
| 367 |
|
| 368 |
log_entry[f'{human_role}.initial_order'] = human_initial_order; log_entry[f'{human_role}.ai_suggestion'] = ai_suggestion
|
| 369 |
state['logs'].append(log_entry)
|
| 370 |
state['week'] += 1; state['decision_step'] = 'initial_order'; state['last_week_orders'] = current_week_orders
|
| 371 |
state['current_ai_suggestion'] = None # Clean up
|
| 372 |
if state['week'] > WEEKS: state['game_running'] = False
|
| 373 |
-
# ==============================================================================
|
| 374 |
-
|
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
def plot_results(df: pd.DataFrame, title: str, human_role: str):
|
| 377 |
# This function remains correct.
|
|
@@ -472,7 +400,7 @@ def show_leaderboard_ui():
|
|
| 472 |
else:
|
| 473 |
try:
|
| 474 |
df = pd.DataFrame(leaderboard_data.values())
|
| 475 |
-
if 'id' not in df.columns and not df.empty: df['id'] = list(
|
| 476 |
if 'total_cost' not in df.columns or 'order_std_dev' not in df.columns or 'setting' not in df.columns:
|
| 477 |
st.error("Leaderboard data is corrupted or incomplete.")
|
| 478 |
return
|
|
@@ -593,7 +521,7 @@ else:
|
|
| 593 |
st.markdown("---")
|
| 594 |
st.subheader("Supply Chain Status (Start of Week State)")
|
| 595 |
|
| 596 |
-
# =============== MODIFIED UI LOGIC (
|
| 597 |
if info_sharing == 'full':
|
| 598 |
cols = st.columns(4)
|
| 599 |
for i, name in enumerate(echelon_order):
|
|
@@ -608,7 +536,10 @@ else:
|
|
| 608 |
|
| 609 |
st.metric("Inventory (Opening)", e['inventory'])
|
| 610 |
st.metric("Backlog (Opening)", e['backlog'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 611 |
|
|
|
|
| 612 |
current_incoming_order = 0
|
| 613 |
if name == "Retailer":
|
| 614 |
current_incoming_order = get_customer_demand(week)
|
|
@@ -619,20 +550,33 @@ else:
|
|
| 619 |
st.write(f"Incoming Order (This Week): **{current_incoming_order}**")
|
| 620 |
|
| 621 |
if name == "Factory":
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 622 |
prod_completing_next = state['last_week_orders'].get("Distributor", 0)
|
|
|
|
| 623 |
st.write(f"Completing Next Week: **{prod_completing_next}**")
|
| 624 |
else:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 625 |
arriving_next = 0
|
| 626 |
|
| 627 |
-
#
|
| 628 |
if name == 'Distributor':
|
| 629 |
-
#
|
| 630 |
if state['factory_production_pipeline']:
|
| 631 |
arriving_next = list(state['factory_production_pipeline'])[0]
|
| 632 |
-
|
| 633 |
-
|
| 634 |
-
|
| 635 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 636 |
|
| 637 |
st.write(f"Arriving Next Week: **{arriving_next}**")
|
| 638 |
|
|
@@ -654,14 +598,12 @@ else:
|
|
| 654 |
st.write(f"**Incoming Order (This Week):**\n# {current_incoming_order}")
|
| 655 |
|
| 656 |
with col3:
|
| 657 |
-
#
|
| 658 |
-
# "Arriving
|
| 659 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 660 |
arriving_next = 0
|
| 661 |
-
if state['factory_production_pipeline']:
|
| 662 |
-
arriving_next = list(state['factory_production_pipeline'])[0]
|
| 663 |
st.write(f"**Shipment Arriving (Next Week):**\n# {arriving_next}")
|
| 664 |
-
# -----------------------------------------------------------
|
| 665 |
|
| 666 |
# =======================================================
|
| 667 |
|
|
@@ -669,6 +611,7 @@ else:
|
|
| 669 |
st.header("Your Decision (Step 4)")
|
| 670 |
|
| 671 |
# Prepare the state snapshot for the AI prompt (State AFTER arrivals/orders, BEFORE shipping)
|
|
|
|
| 672 |
all_decision_point_states = {}
|
| 673 |
for name in echelon_order:
|
| 674 |
e_curr = echelons[name] # This is END OF LAST WEEK state
|
|
@@ -687,7 +630,6 @@ else:
|
|
| 687 |
inv_after_arrival = e_curr['inventory'] + arrived
|
| 688 |
backlog_after_new_order = e_curr['backlog'] + inc_order_this_week
|
| 689 |
|
| 690 |
-
# This is the state used for the prompt, it's calculated BEFORE the pop
|
| 691 |
all_decision_point_states[name] = {
|
| 692 |
'name': name, 'inventory': inv_after_arrival, 'backlog': backlog_after_new_order,
|
| 693 |
'incoming_order': inc_order_this_week,
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# app.py
|
| 2 |
+
# @title Beer Game Final Version (v4.25 - Based on v4.21 Logic + UI Fixes v3 - Log Fix)
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
# 1. Import Libraries
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
ORDER_PASSING_DELAY = 1 # Handled by last_week_orders
|
| 36 |
SHIPPING_DELAY = 2 # General shipping delay (R->W, W->D)
|
| 37 |
FACTORY_LEAD_TIME = 1
|
| 38 |
+
FACTORY_SHIPPING_DELAY = 1 # Specific delay from Factory to Distributor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
HOLDING_COST = 0.5
|
| 40 |
BACKLOG_COST = 1.0
|
| 41 |
|
|
|
|
| 86 |
for i, name in enumerate(roles):
|
| 87 |
upstream = roles[i + 1] if i + 1 < len(roles) else None
|
| 88 |
downstream = roles[i - 1] if i - 1 >= 0 else None
|
| 89 |
+
if name == "Distributor": shipping_weeks = FACTORY_SHIPPING_DELAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
elif name == "Factory": shipping_weeks = 0
|
| 91 |
+
else: shipping_weeks = SHIPPING_DELAY
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
st.session_state.game_state['echelons'][name] = {
|
| 93 |
'name': name, 'inventory': INITIAL_INVENTORY, 'backlog': INITIAL_BACKLOG,
|
| 94 |
'incoming_shipments': deque([0] * shipping_weeks, maxlen=shipping_weeks),
|
|
|
|
| 121 |
st.error(f"API call failed for {echelon_name}: {e}. Defaulting to 4.")
|
| 122 |
return 4, f"API_ERROR: {e}"
|
| 123 |
|
|
|
|
| 124 |
def get_llm_prompt(echelon_state_decision_point: dict, week: int, llm_personality: str, info_sharing: str, all_echelons_state_decision_point: dict) -> str:
|
| 125 |
+
# This function's logic remains correct (from v4.21).
|
| 126 |
e_state = echelon_state_decision_point
|
| 127 |
base_info = f"Your Current Status at the **{e_state['name']}** for **Week {week}** (Before Shipping):\n- On-hand inventory: {e_state['inventory']} units.\n- Backlog (total unfilled orders): {e_state['backlog']} units.\n- Incoming order this week (just received): {e_state['incoming_order']} units.\n"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 128 |
if e_state['name'] == 'Factory':
|
| 129 |
task_word = "production quantity"
|
| 130 |
base_info += f"- Your Production Pipeline (completing next week onwards): {list(st.session_state.game_state['factory_production_pipeline'])}"
|
| 131 |
else:
|
| 132 |
task_word = "order quantity"
|
| 133 |
base_info += f"- Shipments In Transit To You (arriving next week onwards): {list(e_state['incoming_shipments'])}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 134 |
if llm_personality == 'perfect_rational' and info_sharing == 'full':
|
| 135 |
+
stable_demand = 8
|
| 136 |
+
if e_state['name'] == 'Factory': total_lead_time = FACTORY_LEAD_TIME
|
| 137 |
+
elif e_state['name'] == 'Distributor': total_lead_time = ORDER_PASSING_DELAY + FACTORY_LEAD_TIME + FACTORY_SHIPPING_DELAY
|
| 138 |
+
else: total_lead_time = ORDER_PASSING_DELAY + SHIPPING_DELAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 139 |
safety_stock = 4
|
| 140 |
target_inventory_level = (stable_demand * total_lead_time) + safety_stock
|
| 141 |
if e_state['name'] == 'Factory':
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
inv_pos_components = f"(Inv={e_state['inventory']} - Backlog={e_state['backlog']} + InTransitShip={sum(e_state['incoming_shipments'])} + OrderToSupplier={order_in_transit_to_supplier})"
|
| 148 |
optimal_order = max(0, int(target_inventory_level - inventory_position))
|
| 149 |
return f"**You are a perfectly rational supply chain AI with full system visibility.**\nYour only goal is to maintain stability and minimize costs based on mathematical optimization.\n**System Analysis:**\n* **Known Stable End-Customer Demand:** {stable_demand} units/week.\n* **Your Current Total Inventory Position:** {inventory_position} units. {inv_pos_components}\n* **Optimal Target Inventory Level:** {target_inventory_level} units (Target for {total_lead_time} weeks lead time).\n* **Mathematically Optimal {task_word.title()}:** The optimal decision is **{optimal_order} units**.\n**Your Task:** Confirm this optimal {task_word}. Respond with a single integer."
|
|
|
|
| 150 |
elif llm_personality == 'perfect_rational' and info_sharing == 'local':
|
| 151 |
safety_stock = 4; anchor_demand = e_state['incoming_order']
|
| 152 |
inventory_correction = safety_stock - (e_state['inventory'] - e_state['backlog'])
|
|
|
|
| 160 |
calculated_order = anchor_demand + inventory_correction - supply_line
|
| 161 |
rational_local_order = max(0, int(calculated_order))
|
| 162 |
return f"**You are a perfectly rational supply chain AI with ONLY LOCAL information.**\nYou must use a logical heuristic to make a stable decision. A proven method is \"Anchoring and Adjustment\".\n\n{base_info}\n\n**Rational Calculation (Anchoring & Adjustment):**\n1. **Anchor on Demand:** Your best guess for future demand is your last incoming order: **{anchor_demand} units**.\n2. **Adjust for Inventory:** You want to hold a safety stock of {safety_stock} units. Your current stock (before shipping) is {e_state['inventory'] - e_state['backlog']}. You need to order an extra **{inventory_correction} units** to correct this.\n3. **Account for {supply_line_desc}:** You already have **{supply_line} units** being processed. These should be subtracted from your new decision.\n\n**Final Calculation:**\n* Decision = (Anchor Demand) + (Inventory Adjustment) - ({supply_line_desc})\n* Decision = {anchor_demand} + {inventory_correction} - {supply_line} = **{rational_local_order} units**.\n**Your Task:** Confirm this locally rational {task_word}. Respond with a single integer."
|
| 163 |
+
elif llm_personality == 'human_like' and info_sharing == 'full':
|
| 164 |
+
full_info_str = f"\n**Full Supply Chain Information (State Before Shipping):**\n- End-Customer Demand this week: {get_customer_demand(week)} units.\n"
|
| 165 |
+
for name, other_e_state in all_echelons_state_decision_point.items():
|
| 166 |
+
if name != e_state['name']: full_info_str += f"- {name}: Inv={other_e_state['inventory']}, Backlog={other_e_state['backlog']}\n"
|
| 167 |
+
return f"""
|
| 168 |
+
**You are a supply chain manager ({e_state['name']}) with full system visibility.**
|
| 169 |
+
You can see everyone's current inventory and backlog before shipping, and the real customer demand.
|
| 170 |
+
{base_info}
|
| 171 |
+
{full_info_str}
|
| 172 |
+
**Your Task:** Your primary responsibility is to meet the demand from your direct customer (your `Incoming order this week`: **{e_state['incoming_order']}** units), which contributes to your total current backlog of {e_state['backlog']}.
|
| 173 |
+
While you can see the stable end-customer demand ({get_customer_demand(week)} units), your priority is to fulfill the order you just received and manage your inventory/backlog.
|
| 174 |
+
You are still human and might get anxious about your own stock levels.
|
| 175 |
+
What {task_word} should you decide on this week? Respond with a single integer.
|
| 176 |
+
"""
|
| 177 |
+
elif llm_personality == 'human_like' and info_sharing == 'local':
|
| 178 |
+
return f"""
|
| 179 |
+
**You are a reactive supply chain manager for the {e_state['name']}.** You have a limited view and tend to over-correct based on fear.
|
| 180 |
+
Your top priority is to NOT have a backlog.
|
| 181 |
+
{base_info}
|
| 182 |
+
**Your Task:** You just received an incoming order for **{e_state['incoming_order']}** units, adding to your total backlog.
|
| 183 |
+
Your gut instinct is to panic and {task_word.split(' ')[0]} enough to ensure you are never caught with a backlog again, considering your current inventory.
|
| 184 |
+
**React emotionally.** What is your knee-jerk {task_word}? Respond with a single integer.
|
| 185 |
+
"""
|
| 186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 187 |
def step_game(human_final_order: int, human_initial_order: int, ai_suggestion: int):
|
| 188 |
+
# This is the correct logic from v4.17
|
| 189 |
state = st.session_state.game_state
|
| 190 |
week, echelons, human_role = state['week'], state['echelons'], state['human_role']
|
| 191 |
llm_personality, info_sharing = state['llm_personality'], state['info_sharing']
|
|
|
|
| 196 |
opening_inventories = {name: e['inventory'] for name, e in echelons.items()}
|
| 197 |
opening_backlogs = {name: e['backlog'] for name, e in echelons.items()}
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
+
# --- LOG FIX (v3): Capture arrival data BEFORE mutation ---
|
| 200 |
+
arrived_this_week = {name: 0 for name in echelon_order}
|
| 201 |
+
# This dict will store the value shown on the UI for "next week"
|
| 202 |
+
opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE = {name: 0 for name in echelon_order}
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 |
+
# Factory
|
| 205 |
+
factory_q = state['factory_production_pipeline']
|
| 206 |
if factory_q:
|
| 207 |
+
arrived_this_week["Factory"] = factory_q[0] # Read before pop
|
| 208 |
+
if len(factory_q) > 1:
|
| 209 |
+
opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE["Factory"] = factory_q[1] # Read [1] before pop
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
# R, W, D
|
| 212 |
for name in ["Retailer", "Wholesaler", "Distributor"]:
|
| 213 |
shipment_q = echelons[name]['incoming_shipments']
|
| 214 |
if shipment_q:
|
| 215 |
+
arrived_this_week[name] = shipment_q[0] # Read before pop
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
+
# This logic MUST match the v2 UI logic
|
| 218 |
if name == 'Distributor':
|
| 219 |
+
# "Next" for Distributor is what's at the front of the Factory's pipeline
|
| 220 |
if factory_q:
|
| 221 |
+
opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE[name] = factory_q[0]
|
| 222 |
elif name in ("Retailer", "Wholesaler"):
|
| 223 |
+
if len(shipment_q) > 1: # q_len=2
|
| 224 |
+
opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE[name] = shipment_q[1]
|
| 225 |
+
elif len(shipment_q) == 1: # q_len=1
|
| 226 |
+
opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE[name] = shipment_q[0] # Match the v2 UI
|
| 227 |
+
# --- END OF LOG FIX (v3) ---
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
+
# Now, the *actual* state mutation (popping)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 230 |
inventory_after_arrival = {}
|
| 231 |
factory_state = echelons["Factory"]
|
| 232 |
produced_units = 0
|
| 233 |
if state['factory_production_pipeline']:
|
| 234 |
+
produced_units = state['factory_production_pipeline'].popleft()
|
|
|
|
| 235 |
inventory_after_arrival["Factory"] = factory_state['inventory'] + produced_units
|
| 236 |
|
| 237 |
for name in ["Retailer", "Wholesaler", "Distributor"]:
|
| 238 |
arrived_shipment = 0
|
| 239 |
if echelons[name]['incoming_shipments']:
|
| 240 |
+
arrived_shipment = echelons[name]['incoming_shipments'].popleft()
|
|
|
|
| 241 |
inventory_after_arrival[name] = echelons[name]['inventory'] + arrived_shipment
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
# (Rest of game logic)
|
| 244 |
total_backlog_before_shipping = {}
|
| 245 |
for name in echelon_order:
|
| 246 |
incoming_order_for_this_week = 0
|
|
|
|
| 255 |
decision_point_states[name] = {
|
| 256 |
'name': name, 'inventory': inventory_after_arrival[name],
|
| 257 |
'backlog': total_backlog_before_shipping[name], 'incoming_order': echelons[name]['incoming_order'],
|
| 258 |
+
'incoming_shipments': echelons[name]['incoming_shipments'].copy() if name != "Factory" else deque(),
|
| 259 |
}
|
| 260 |
current_week_orders = {}
|
| 261 |
for name in echelon_order:
|
|
|
|
| 284 |
for key in ['inventory', 'backlog', 'incoming_order', 'order_placed', 'shipment_sent', 'weekly_cost', 'total_cost']: log_entry[f'{name}.{key}'] = e[key]
|
| 285 |
log_entry[f'{name}.llm_raw_response'] = llm_raw_responses.get(name, "")
|
| 286 |
|
| 287 |
+
# --- LOG FIX (v3): Use captured values ---
|
| 288 |
log_entry[f'{name}.opening_inventory'] = opening_inventories[name]
|
| 289 |
log_entry[f'{name}.opening_backlog'] = opening_backlogs[name]
|
| 290 |
+
log_entry[f'{name}.arrived_this_week'] = arrived_this_week[name] # Use captured value
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 |
if name != 'Factory':
|
| 293 |
+
log_entry[f'{name}.arriving_next_week'] = opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE[name]
|
| 294 |
else:
|
| 295 |
+
log_entry[f'{name}.production_completing_next_week'] = opening_arriving_next_week_UI_VALUE[name]
|
| 296 |
+
# --- END OF LOG FIX (v3) ---
|
| 297 |
|
| 298 |
log_entry[f'{human_role}.initial_order'] = human_initial_order; log_entry[f'{human_role}.ai_suggestion'] = ai_suggestion
|
| 299 |
state['logs'].append(log_entry)
|
| 300 |
state['week'] += 1; state['decision_step'] = 'initial_order'; state['last_week_orders'] = current_week_orders
|
| 301 |
state['current_ai_suggestion'] = None # Clean up
|
| 302 |
if state['week'] > WEEKS: state['game_running'] = False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 303 |
|
| 304 |
def plot_results(df: pd.DataFrame, title: str, human_role: str):
|
| 305 |
# This function remains correct.
|
|
|
|
| 400 |
else:
|
| 401 |
try:
|
| 402 |
df = pd.DataFrame(leaderboard_data.values())
|
| 403 |
+
if 'id' not in df.columns and not df.empty: df['id'] = list(leaderboard_data.keys())
|
| 404 |
if 'total_cost' not in df.columns or 'order_std_dev' not in df.columns or 'setting' not in df.columns:
|
| 405 |
st.error("Leaderboard data is corrupted or incomplete.")
|
| 406 |
return
|
|
|
|
| 521 |
st.markdown("---")
|
| 522 |
st.subheader("Supply Chain Status (Start of Week State)")
|
| 523 |
|
| 524 |
+
# =============== MODIFIED UI LOGIC (v4.22) ===============
|
| 525 |
if info_sharing == 'full':
|
| 526 |
cols = st.columns(4)
|
| 527 |
for i, name in enumerate(echelon_order):
|
|
|
|
| 536 |
|
| 537 |
st.metric("Inventory (Opening)", e['inventory'])
|
| 538 |
st.metric("Backlog (Opening)", e['backlog'])
|
| 539 |
+
|
| 540 |
+
# 移除成本显示
|
| 541 |
|
| 542 |
+
# --- NEW: Added Arriving This Week ---
|
| 543 |
current_incoming_order = 0
|
| 544 |
if name == "Retailer":
|
| 545 |
current_incoming_order = get_customer_demand(week)
|
|
|
|
| 550 |
st.write(f"Incoming Order (This Week): **{current_incoming_order}**")
|
| 551 |
|
| 552 |
if name == "Factory":
|
| 553 |
+
# FIX: 'Arriving This Week' (Completing This Week) removed from UI
|
| 554 |
+
|
| 555 |
+
# FIX: 'Next week' for Factory is the order it just received from Distributor
|
| 556 |
prod_completing_next = state['last_week_orders'].get("Distributor", 0)
|
| 557 |
+
|
| 558 |
st.write(f"Completing Next Week: **{prod_completing_next}**")
|
| 559 |
else:
|
| 560 |
+
# FIX: 'Arriving This Week' removed from UI
|
| 561 |
+
|
| 562 |
arriving_next = 0
|
| 563 |
|
| 564 |
+
# FIX: Logic to correctly calculate 'Arriving Next Week'
|
| 565 |
if name == 'Distributor':
|
| 566 |
+
# 'Next week' for Distributor is what's in the factory pipeline
|
| 567 |
if state['factory_production_pipeline']:
|
| 568 |
arriving_next = list(state['factory_production_pipeline'])[0]
|
| 569 |
+
|
| 570 |
+
elif len(e['incoming_shipments']) > 1:
|
| 571 |
+
# R/W: q_len=2, 'next' is [1]
|
| 572 |
+
arriving_next = list(e['incoming_shipments'])[1]
|
| 573 |
+
|
| 574 |
+
elif len(e['incoming_shipments']) == 1 and name in ('Wholesaler', 'Retailer'):
|
| 575 |
+
# R/W: q_len=1, 'next' is [0] (as 'this' is 0)
|
| 576 |
+
arriving_next = list(e['incoming_shipments'])[0]
|
| 577 |
+
|
| 578 |
+
# (if q_len=0, arriving_next remains 0)
|
| 579 |
+
# (if q_len=1 and is Distributor, arriving_next remains 0, which is correct)
|
| 580 |
|
| 581 |
st.write(f"Arriving Next Week: **{arriving_next}**")
|
| 582 |
|
|
|
|
| 598 |
st.write(f"**Incoming Order (This Week):**\n# {current_incoming_order}")
|
| 599 |
|
| 600 |
with col3:
|
| 601 |
+
# FIX: 'Arriving This Week' removed from UI per user request
|
| 602 |
+
# st.write(f"**Shipment Arriving (This Week):**\n# {list(e['incoming_shipments'])[0] if e['incoming_shipments'] else 0}")
|
| 603 |
+
|
| 604 |
+
# Arriving NEXT week (Distributor's local view CANNOT see factory pipeline)
|
| 605 |
arriving_next = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 606 |
st.write(f"**Shipment Arriving (Next Week):**\n# {arriving_next}")
|
|
|
|
| 607 |
|
| 608 |
# =======================================================
|
| 609 |
|
|
|
|
| 611 |
st.header("Your Decision (Step 4)")
|
| 612 |
|
| 613 |
# Prepare the state snapshot for the AI prompt (State AFTER arrivals/orders, BEFORE shipping)
|
| 614 |
+
# This logic remains correct and is NOT a UI element
|
| 615 |
all_decision_point_states = {}
|
| 616 |
for name in echelon_order:
|
| 617 |
e_curr = echelons[name] # This is END OF LAST WEEK state
|
|
|
|
| 630 |
inv_after_arrival = e_curr['inventory'] + arrived
|
| 631 |
backlog_after_new_order = e_curr['backlog'] + inc_order_this_week
|
| 632 |
|
|
|
|
| 633 |
all_decision_point_states[name] = {
|
| 634 |
'name': name, 'inventory': inv_after_arrival, 'backlog': backlog_after_new_order,
|
| 635 |
'incoming_order': inc_order_this_week,
|