| Vibe Coding HTML5 User Environment App Version: 1.0 Date: 2023-10-27 1. Introduction & Overview 1.1 Purpose: This document specifies the functional requirements for the Vibe Coding HTML5 User Environment App. This web-based application serves as an integrated front-end for development teams, Product Owners, and stakeholders operating within a Scrum framework. It aims to provide a streamlined interface for visualizing prioritized backlogs, facilitating contextual feedback, and connecting work items to development artifacts. 1.2 Goals: Provide a clear, real-time view of the product backlog generated and prioritized via associated automation tools (Ref: Epic - Backlog Automation & Prioritization). Enable efficient, visually-anchored feedback collection on UI elements, mockups, or prototypes (Ref: Feature C - WYSIWYG Feedback Annotator). Offer context linking backlog items to relevant code structures or development tasks (Ref: Feature B - Iteration Code Engine). Support Agile principles of transparency, collaboration, and rapid feedback loops. 1.3 Target Audience: Development Team members Product Owner Stakeholders involved in review/feedback cycles 1.4 Scope: This specification covers the user-facing features of the HTML5 application. It assumes the existence of backend services responsible for backlog generation/prioritization (Feature A) and code skeleton generation (Feature B). This application primarily consumes data from those services and provides the interface for Feature C. 2. Guiding Principles (Derived from Initial Prompt) 2.1 Negotiated Scope Support: The application must clearly display the current, prioritized backlog, making scope visible and facilitating informed negotiation between the Development Team and Product Owner. Changes in the underlying backlog data (managed externally) should be reflected dynamically or upon refresh. 2.2 Simplicity (Maximize Work Not Done): The application interface should be intuitive and focus on core tasks: viewing the backlog, providing feedback, and accessing development context. Avoid unnecessary complexity or features not directly supporting these core workflows. 3. Functional Requirements 3.1 Backlog Visualization (Connects to Feature A Output) F.3.1.1 Display Backlog Board: The system shall display the product backlog items (e.g., Epics, Features, Stories, Tasks - represented as 'Cards') in a visual format, such as a Kanban-style board (e.g., columns for To Do, In Progress, Done) or a prioritized list. F.3.1.2 Display Card Details: Each card on the board/list shall display key information pulled from the backlog source, minimally including: Title/Name Unique Identifier User Value Score (or other prioritization metric) Current Status (aligned with board columns if applicable) F.3.1.3 View Extended Card Details: Users shall be able to select a card to view extended details, potentially including: Full Description Acceptance Criteria Dependencies (links or identifiers of related cards) Associated Feedback count/link (See F.3.2) Links to Code/Development Artifacts (See F.3.3) F.3.1.4 Reflect Prioritization: The primary view (list or board columns) shall visually represent the prioritization determined by the external process (Feature A), typically via vertical order within a list/column. F.3.1.5 Filtering and Searching: Users shall be able to filter or search the backlog view based on criteria like title, status, or potentially keywords. 3.2 WYSIWYG Feedback Annotation (Implements Feature C) F.3.2.1 Initiate Feedback Session: Users shall be able to initiate a feedback session associated with a specific backlog card. This may involve: Uploading an image (mockup, screenshot). Pasting a URL to a live prototype or staging environment (to be rendered within an iframe or similar). F.3.2.2 Load Visual Context: The system shall display the uploaded image or render the provided URL within a dedicated feedback view. F.3.2.3 Place Annotation Hotspots: Users shall be able to click directly on specific points or areas within the displayed visual context (image/rendered page). F.3.2.4 Add Anchored Comments: Clicking a point (F.3.2.3) shall open an input field allowing the user to type and submit a textual comment anchored to that specific location. F.3.2.5 View Existing Annotations: The system shall display previously submitted annotation hotspots and their associated comments on the visual context. Hovering or clicking a hotspot should reveal the comment. F.3.2.6 Link Feedback to Backlog: All annotations and comments created within a feedback session (F.3.2.1) shall be automatically associated with the corresponding backlog card. The card view (F.3.1.3) should indicate the presence of feedback. F.3.2.7 Feedback Synchronization: Feedback submitted via the annotator must be persisted and linked such that it can be retrieved later and potentially synced/pushed to the underlying backlog management system if required by the implementation of Feature A/C integration. 3.3 Development Context Linking (Connects to Feature B Output) F.3.3.1 Display Code Skeleton Links: When viewing extended card details (F.3.1.3), the system shall display links or references to code skeletons, directories, or specific files generated by the Iteration Code Engine (Feature B) relevant to that backlog item. F.3.3.2 Indicate Generation Status (Optional): The system may optionally display the status of code generation for a given item (e.g., "Not Generated," "Generated," "Generation Failed"). Note: Triggering generation itself is likely outside the scope of this UI app. 3.4 User Interface & Experience F.3.4.1 Web-Based Access: The application shall be accessible via standard modern web browsers (HTML5 compatible). F.3.4.2 Responsive Design: The layout should adapt reasonably well to different screen sizes (desktop, tablet). F.3.4.3 Intuitive Navigation: Users should be able to easily navigate between the backlog view, card details, and the feedback annotation interface. 4. Non-Functional Requirements (High-Level) NF.4.1 Performance: The application should load backlog data and render feedback interfaces in a timely manner, providing a responsive user experience. NF.4.2 Usability: The interface should be intuitive and require minimal training for target users. NF.4.3 Availability: The application should be reliably available during standard working hours. 5. Integration Points IP.5.1 Backlog Data Source API: The application will need to consume data (read-only) from the system responsible for storing and managing the backlog generated by Feature A (e.g., Trello API, a custom database API). IP.5.2 Feedback Storage API: The application will need an API endpoint to save and retrieve feedback annotations (hotspot coordinates, comments, associated card ID, visual context reference). This might be the same or a different system than the backlog source. IP.5.3 Code Context Data Source (Optional): The application may need to query a source (e.g., API, database) to retrieve links/status information related to code generated by Feature B. 6. Assumptions A backend system exists or will be developed to handle backlog generation, prioritization, storage (Feature A). A backend system or process exists or will be developed for code skeleton generation (Feature B). Mechanisms for user authentication and authorization are handled externally or will be specified separately. The specific format and API for accessing backlog data, storing feedback, and accessing code context links will be defined. 7. Out of Scope The implementation logic of the Backlog Generator (Feature A). The implementation logic of the Iteration Code Engine (Feature B). User management (registration, roles, permissions). Direct modification of the backlog structure or priority within this application (it primarily visualizes and collects feedback). Real-time collaborative editing features (beyond viewing shared feedback). |