File size: 8,629 Bytes
6f237d6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
"""
eval/calibration.py
--------------------
Phase 11 β€” Calibration Curve Generator

Reads eval/results/recon_linear.csv and produces:
    docs/calibration_curve.png

The calibration curve answers: "When the critic assigns a verdict,
does that verdict actually predict position accuracy?"

A well-calibrated critic shows:
    PASS > FORCED_PASS > INSUFFICIENT > STALE (in position accuracy)

This proves the critic's verdict tiers are statistically meaningful,
not arbitrary heuristic labels.

Run from repo root:
    python eval/calibration.py
"""

import sys
import os
import csv
import json
from collections import defaultdict

sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), ".."))

# ── Output paths ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
EVAL_DIR  = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
DOCS_DIR  = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(EVAL_DIR), "docs")
os.makedirs(DOCS_DIR, exist_ok=True)

RECON_LINEAR_CSV = os.path.join(EVAL_DIR, "results", "recon_linear.csv")
OUTPUT_PNG       = os.path.join(DOCS_DIR, "calibration_curve.png")

# ── Verdict display order and colours ────────────────────────────────────────
VERDICT_ORDER = ["PASS", "FORCED_PASS", "STALE", "INSUFFICIENT", "CONTRADICTED", "N/A"]

VERDICT_COLORS = {
    "PASS":         "#22c55e",   # green
    "FORCED_PASS":  "#f59e0b",   # amber
    "STALE":        "#f97316",   # orange
    "INSUFFICIENT": "#ef4444",   # red
    "CONTRADICTED": "#a855f7",   # purple
    "N/A":          "#6b7280",   # grey
}

VERDICT_LABELS = {
    "PASS":         "PASS",
    "FORCED_PASS":  "FORCED\nPASS",
    "STALE":        "STALE",
    "INSUFFICIENT": "INSUF.",
    "CONTRADICTED": "CONTRA.",
    "N/A":          "N/A",
}

# Accuracy score: MATCH=1.0, PARTIAL=0.5, MISMATCH=0.0, others=excluded
ACCURACY_SCORE = {"MATCH": 1.0, "PARTIAL": 0.5, "MISMATCH": 0.0}


def load_recon_linear() -> list[dict]:
    if not os.path.exists(RECON_LINEAR_CSV):
        raise FileNotFoundError(
            f"recon_linear.csv not found at {RECON_LINEAR_CSV}\n"
            "Run eval/run_eval.py first."
        )
    with open(RECON_LINEAR_CSV, encoding="utf-8") as f:
        return list(csv.DictReader(f))


def compute_calibration(rows: list[dict]) -> dict:
    """
    For each critic verdict bin, compute:
      - mean position accuracy (MATCH=1, PARTIAL=0.5, MISMATCH=0)
      - count of questions in that bin
      - 95% confidence interval (Wilson score interval approximation)
    """
    import math

    bins = defaultdict(list)

    for row in rows:
        verdict  = row.get("critic_verdict", "N/A") or "N/A"
        accuracy = row.get("position_accuracy", "")

        if accuracy not in ACCURACY_SCORE:
            continue  # skip SKIPPED / ERROR rows

        bins[verdict].append(ACCURACY_SCORE[accuracy])

    result = {}
    for verdict, scores in bins.items():
        n    = len(scores)
        mean = sum(scores) / n if n else 0.0

        # Standard error for mean of bounded [0,1] scores
        variance = sum((s - mean) ** 2 for s in scores) / n if n > 1 else 0.0
        se       = math.sqrt(variance / n) if n > 0 else 0.0
        ci95     = 1.96 * se

        result[verdict] = {
            "mean":  round(mean, 4),
            "count": n,
            "ci95":  round(ci95, 4),
        }

    return result


def plot_calibration(calibration: dict, output_path: str) -> None:
    import matplotlib
    matplotlib.use("Agg")   # non-interactive backend β€” works on Windows + Colab
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
    import matplotlib.patches as mpatches
    import numpy as np

    # Filter to verdicts that actually appear in the data
    present = [v for v in VERDICT_ORDER if v in calibration]

    if not present:
        print("⚠ No verdict data found β€” nothing to plot.")
        return

    means  = [calibration[v]["mean"]  for v in present]
    ci95s  = [calibration[v]["ci95"]  for v in present]
    counts = [calibration[v]["count"] for v in present]
    colors = [VERDICT_COLORS.get(v, "#6b7280") for v in present]
    labels = [VERDICT_LABELS.get(v, v) for v in present]

    x = np.arange(len(present))

    fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(9, 5.5))
    fig.patch.set_facecolor("#0f172a")
    ax.set_facecolor("#1e293b")

    # Bars
    bars = ax.bar(
        x, means,
        width=0.55,
        color=colors,
        alpha=0.88,
        zorder=3,
        edgecolor="#0f172a",
        linewidth=1.2,
    )

    # Error bars (95% CI)
    ax.errorbar(
        x, means,
        yerr=ci95s,
        fmt="none",
        ecolor="#e2e8f0",
        elinewidth=1.5,
        capsize=5,
        capthick=1.5,
        zorder=4,
    )

    # Value labels on bars
    for bar, mean, count, ci in zip(bars, means, counts, ci95s):
        ax.text(
            bar.get_x() + bar.get_width() / 2,
            mean + ci + 0.025,
            f"{mean:.0%}",
            ha="center", va="bottom",
            fontsize=10, fontweight="bold",
            color="#f1f5f9",
        )
        ax.text(
            bar.get_x() + bar.get_width() / 2,
            0.01,
            f"n={count}",
            ha="center", va="bottom",
            fontsize=8,
            color="#94a3b8",
        )

    # Reference line at chance (0.5 = all PARTIAL)
    ax.axhline(0.5, color="#64748b", linestyle="--", linewidth=1.0,
               alpha=0.6, zorder=2, label="PARTIAL baseline (0.50)")

    # Gridlines
    ax.yaxis.grid(True, color="#334155", linewidth=0.6, alpha=0.7, zorder=1)
    ax.set_axisbelow(True)
    ax.spines[["top", "right", "left", "bottom"]].set_visible(False)
    ax.tick_params(colors="#94a3b8", length=0)

    # Axes
    ax.set_xticks(x)
    ax.set_xticklabels(labels, fontsize=10, color="#e2e8f0", fontweight="500")
    ax.set_ylim(0, 1.12)
    ax.set_yticks([0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0])
    ax.set_yticklabels(["0%", "25%", "50%", "75%", "100%"],
                       fontsize=9, color="#94a3b8")

    # Labels and title
    ax.set_xlabel("Critic Verdict", fontsize=11, color="#94a3b8",
                  labelpad=10, fontweight="500")
    ax.set_ylabel("Position Accuracy\n(MATCH=1.0 Β· PARTIAL=0.5 Β· MISMATCH=0)",
                  fontsize=9, color="#94a3b8", labelpad=10)

    ax.set_title(
        "RECON Critic Calibration Curve",
        fontsize=14, fontweight="bold", color="#f1f5f9", pad=16,
    )
    ax.text(
        0.5, 1.04,
        "Position accuracy by critic verdict β€” recon_linear Β· 130 questions",
        transform=ax.transAxes,
        ha="center", fontsize=9, color="#64748b",
    )

    # Legend
    ax.legend(
        loc="upper right", fontsize=8,
        facecolor="#1e293b", edgecolor="#334155",
        labelcolor="#94a3b8",
    )

    plt.tight_layout(pad=1.5)
    plt.savefig(output_path, dpi=160, bbox_inches="tight",
                facecolor=fig.get_facecolor())
    plt.close()

    print(f"βœ… Calibration curve saved β†’ {output_path}")


def main():
    print("=" * 55)
    print("RECON β€” Calibration Curve Generator")
    print("=" * 55)

    rows = load_recon_linear()
    print(f"Loaded {len(rows)} rows from recon_linear.csv")

    calibration = compute_calibration(rows)

    print("\nCalibration data:")
    print(f"  {'Verdict':<16} {'Mean Acc':>9} {'Count':>7} {'95% CI':>8}")
    print(f"  {'-'*16} {'-'*9} {'-'*7} {'-'*8}")
    for v in VERDICT_ORDER:
        if v in calibration:
            d = calibration[v]
            print(f"  {v:<16} {d['mean']:>8.1%} {d['count']:>7} Β±{d['ci95']:.3f}")

    print()
    plot_calibration(calibration, OUTPUT_PNG)

    # Also save calibration data as JSON for reference
    json_path = OUTPUT_PNG.replace(".png", ".json")
    with open(json_path, "w") as f:
        json.dump(calibration, f, indent=2)
    print(f"βœ… Calibration data saved β†’ {json_path}")

    print("\nInterpretation:")
    if "PASS" in calibration and "STALE" in calibration:
        pass_acc  = calibration["PASS"]["mean"]
        stale_acc = calibration["STALE"]["mean"]
        if pass_acc > stale_acc:
            print(f"  βœ“ PASS ({pass_acc:.0%}) > STALE ({stale_acc:.0%})")
            print("    Critic is calibrated β€” higher-confidence verdicts")
            print("    correlate with higher position accuracy.")
        else:
            print(f"  ⚠ PASS ({pass_acc:.0%}) ≀ STALE ({stale_acc:.0%})")
            print("    Calibration is weak β€” discuss in limitations.")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()