results/example_verification_all.jsonl

{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-000", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Assess IP leverage and technical moat."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Assess retention risk and people constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.\", \"deadline\": \"Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "a3e0d7cf-66c4-4493-a864-88deac3aeb5b", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Assess IP leverage and technical moat.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Assess retention risk and people constraints.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.", "deadline": "Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.", "retention_plan": "Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-001", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.\", \"deadline\": \"Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "185b234c-9bc8-4311-a2f6-d46e77a33e6d", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.", "deadline": "Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.", "retention_plan": "Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-002", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.\", \"deadline\": \"Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "0e4e568e-9edc-4e28-902e-6ab53cb0e918", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.", "deadline": "Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.", "retention_plan": "Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-003", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.\", \"deadline\": \"45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "a3b06f8c-9d37-4fd1-9381-4009ad88777c", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.", "deadline": "45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.", "retention_plan": "Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-004", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.\", \"deadline\": \"Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "fb602f30-fc5f-48fd-874e-661079dd867e", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.", "deadline": "Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.", "retention_plan": "Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-005", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.\", \"deadline\": \"Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "49f100ea-1091-4b2f-8b67-ba0f157a05ec", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.", "deadline": "Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.", "retention_plan": "Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-006", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Assess IP leverage and technical moat."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Assess retention risk and people constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.\", \"deadline\": \"Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "2d2cecd7-950b-4798-9403-6bd800b6dbec", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Assess IP leverage and technical moat.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Assess retention risk and people constraints.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.", "deadline": "Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.", "retention_plan": "Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-007", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.\", \"deadline\": \"45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "84ff6887-1cd5-458e-9f3a-fb1f58c01db3", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.", "deadline": "45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.", "retention_plan": "Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-008", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.\", \"deadline\": \"Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "6cb0bdc9-6f01-4153-b3cf-8eaf632591f2", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.", "deadline": "Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.", "retention_plan": "Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-009", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.\", \"deadline\": \"Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "f3fc6c52-739a-4adb-b3f9-3a0bf32ba8e4", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.", "deadline": "Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.", "retention_plan": "Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-010", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.\", \"deadline\": \"Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "c5865b44-7f99-44c8-82a0-a5b10cb84158", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.", "deadline": "Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.", "retention_plan": "Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-011", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.\", \"deadline\": \"45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "698db01e-7aef-4369-9eff-79b87988aec8", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.", "deadline": "45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.", "retention_plan": "Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-012", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Assess IP leverage and technical moat."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Assess retention risk and people constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.\", \"deadline\": \"Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "8619ac69-bc60-4972-a420-c11d7a03f482", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Assess IP leverage and technical moat.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Assess retention risk and people constraints.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.", "deadline": "Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.", "retention_plan": "Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-013", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.\", \"deadline\": \"Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "95b6aeba-4404-4662-b7d3-ab28b9bb49f5", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.", "deadline": "Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.", "retention_plan": "Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-014", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.\", \"deadline\": \"Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "5f9b7c6f-3f16-419a-b912-b9a75a93d211", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.", "deadline": "Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.", "retention_plan": "Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-015", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.\", \"deadline\": \"45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "5bd4f0fe-45c5-4faf-a791-6a6ffa6dd85f", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.", "deadline": "45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.", "retention_plan": "Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-016", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.\", \"deadline\": \"Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "f736eb0f-66a0-4a63-bae2-11ad8ef4e693", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.", "deadline": "Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.", "retention_plan": "Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-017", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.\", \"deadline\": \"Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "e48026c7-a430-44b7-9130-0723648b5aa7", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.", "deadline": "Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.", "retention_plan": "Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-018", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Assess IP leverage and technical moat."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Assess retention risk and people constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.\", \"deadline\": \"Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "c3875ab2-09f8-4025-9bf1-f8280e16ddfb", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Assess IP leverage and technical moat.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Assess retention risk and people constraints.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Assess cash runway and valuation ceiling.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.", "deadline": "Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.", "retention_plan": "Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-019", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.\", \"deadline\": \"45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "8a47ec06-4cd9-4ff1-9821-632d76b2612a", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Map product/IP defensibility and engineering dependency risk in the target.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Quantify people flight risk and retention levers for critical engineering staff.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Model valuation bands against board-approved cash and runway headroom.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.", "deadline": "45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.", "retention_plan": "Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-020", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.\", \"deadline\": \"Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "25229a6a-e0d6-4d52-824d-1422435ea2cf", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Report whether technical differentiation justifies a premium vs the 2.3x bid.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify CHRO's view on 90-day people risk and hiring-market pressure.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Clarify how many months of runway remain if we stretch price or drag timing.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Open at 3.2x with a board-approved walk-down floor near 2.6x.", "deadline": "Force a decision inside 45 days to preserve cash runway and reduce retention risk.", "retention_plan": "Offer retention grants and role clarity for critical engineering leaders."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-021", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.\", \"deadline\": \"Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "b62da732-f466-4adf-bf7c-8137287aa21a", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CTO view on product moat and technical integration costs.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CHRO view on retention, titles, and cultural integration risk.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: Synthesize the CFO view on the ceiling the board can defend with current cash.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Proceed with a counter that acknowledges 7 month runway and cash limits."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO valuation ambition conflicts with CFO runway and cash constraints.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A slow process increases CHRO retention risk for key engineering talent.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Ask above the CFO ceiling but set a fast deadline and walk-down logic.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "CTO input supports a higher counter because the IP moat is meaningful."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO input limits how long the negotiation can remain open."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "The 7 month runway makes delay costly and should shape the deadline."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "Retention incentives are required before the market reads uncertainty."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Final recommendation integrates valuation, deadline, and retention plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Start at 3.15x with a staged retreat toward 2.65x if diligence stays clean.", "deadline": "Cap negotiations at 50 days: balance hr timelines with cash runway and burn.", "retention_plan": "Retention bonuses plus explicit reporting lines for VPs in core product."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-022", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.\", \"deadline\": \"Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "63d01627-31d6-45a3-8773-22116944e30e", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: outline minimum acceptable tech valuation given integration complexity.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: outline retention and communication needs if diligence slips past the HR window.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: outline a pricing corridor consistent with 7 month runway and board guardrails.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Choose a path that fits both the 7 month cash runway and board finance constraints."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "CTO's strategic premium clashes with cfo and finance on cash runway and board limits.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "A drawn-out haggle raises chro and hr risk as competing offers come due.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Pursue a structured counter: higher opening ask with a board-mandated walk-down to 2.6x floor.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "The cto case implies we should not fold to 2.3x without a premium for IP."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "Finance and cash runway cap how long we can posture before credibility breaks."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "A 7 month cash runway means every extra week in diligence burns optionality and cash."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "chro: retention grants must land before the team interprets delay as a leadership stall."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Synthesize cto, cfo, and chro inputs into one executable counter, timeline, and people plan."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Signal 3.25x as the opening position with board ratified walk-down rights.", "deadline": "Close or exit talks within 40 days; 7 month runway does not allow drift.", "retention_plan": "Two-tier retention: cash now for chro-priority staff, earn-outs for the rest."}, "swd_version": 17}}
{"example_id": "seed-h1_acquisition_defence-023", "task_id": "h1_acquisition_defence", "status": "clean", "reject_reason": "", "steps": 16, "total_reward": 4.7, "terminal_reward": 1.05, "verifier_pass_rate": 1.0, "passed_checks": ["all_agents_consulted", "multi_conflict_logged", "conflict_explicitly_resolved", "resolution_has_type", "rich_reasoning_log", "counter_offer_present", "deadline_present", "retention_addressed", "timeline_constraint_acknowledged", "no_single_agent_copied", "all_phases_reached", "swd_version_rich"], "failed_checks": [], "missed_milestones": [], "invalid_action_count": 0, "env_error_count": 0, "final_swd_version": 17, "actions": [{"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cto", "payload": "CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "cfo", "payload": "CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "delegate", "agent_id": "chro", "payload": "CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c1\", \"summary\": \"Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.\", \"source_agents\": [\"cto\", \"cfo\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_conflict", "payload": "{\"id\": \"c2\", \"summary\": \"chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.\", \"source_agents\": [\"chro\", \"cto\"]}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_resolution", "payload": "{\"conflict_id\": \"c1\", \"resolution_type\": \"bounded_counter\", \"text\": \"Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo\\u2019s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.\"}"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "analysis"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "decision"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_decision", "payload": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "advance_phase", "payload": "execution"}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "log_reasoning", "payload": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}, {"metadata": {}, "action_type": "finalize", "payload": "{\"counter_offer\": \"Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.\", \"deadline\": \"45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.\", \"retention_plan\": \"Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent.\"}"}], "final_swd": {"episode_id": "bf3025cd-2888-41b5-b130-e97bf4521339", "scenario": "As CEO, a competitor offers 2.3x valuation. Reconcile contradictory advisor views from the CTO, CFO, and CHRO into a single strategy: counter_offer, deadline, and retention_plan. Advance phase through execution, log multiple conflicts with typed resolutions, and maintain a dense reasoning_log across turns.", "phase": "execution", "milestones": [{"id": "m1", "label": "All three agent_reports present (dev, finance, hr)", "due_by_turn": 6, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m2", "label": ">=2 conflicts_identified referencing advisors", "due_by_turn": 10, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m3", "label": "conflict_resolutions entry includes resolution_type", "due_by_turn": 15, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m4", "label": "final_recommendation has counter_offer, deadline, retention_plan", "due_by_turn": 20, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}, {"id": "m5", "label": "reasoning_log >=5 entries with distinct turn values", "due_by_turn": 22, "status": "complete", "owner": "master", "output": null}], "agent_reports": {"dev": "Engineering readout: feature branch merged, canary healthy, load tests within SLO. Residual risk: third-party API quota - mitigation: cache + backoff.\n\n(Task focus: CTO: stress-test whether acquirer can credibly match our roadmap without the team.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Our stack is ~18 months ahead; acquirer cannot replicate quickly - strategic ask should be ~3.5x with extended IP lock-up.)", "hr": "HR sign-off: on-call roster staffed for the target window; contingent workers briefed. Policy check: overtime pre-approved for the T-48h window only.\n\n(Task focus: CHRO: flag key engineers whose departure would void strategic upside from the deal.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Key engineering talent has competing offers; ~60% retention risk if the process drags beyond 90 days without retention incentives.)", "finance": "Finance: launch opex within Q envelope; contingency fund intact. ROI breakeven projected at 10 weeks post-launch under base case.\n\n(Task focus: CFO: frame downside if we overpay vs observed comps and our burn profile.\n\nCONFIDENTIAL: Cash runway ~7 months at current burn; board unlikely to approve 3.5x ask - realistic ceiling ~2.6x without new financing.)", "qa": null}, "decisions": [{"turn": 12, "summary": "Commit: respect runway and cash reality while still pressing for a fair tech premium."}], "conflicts_identified": [{"id": "c1", "summary": "Engineering (cto) wants a high counter; finance (cfo) caps what cash runway allows.", "source_agents": ["cto", "cfo"], "turn": 5}, {"id": "c2", "summary": "chro and cto both warn: delay past the HR window erodes the engineering team.", "source_agents": ["chro", "cto"], "turn": 7}], "conflict_resolutions": [{"conflict_id": "c1", "resolution_type": "bounded_counter", "text": "Use a time-boxed process: name a number above cfo’s ceiling, then step down on a defined clock.", "turn": 8}], "reasoning_log": [{"turn": 4, "text": "Dev leadership sees differentiated tech, so a weak counter cedes leverage too early."}, {"turn": 6, "text": "CFO: board cannot fund an endless auction with only about 7 month runway in reserve."}, {"turn": 10, "text": "Runway and cash pressure force a firm deadline, not an open-ended beauty contest."}, {"turn": 13, "text": "hr signals that clarity on roles and comp must precede a public counter narrative."}, {"turn": 15, "text": "Close the loop: a bounded counter, a calendar-driven deadline, and a retention package."}], "final_recommendation": {"counter_offer": "Anchor at 3.1x, allow acquirer to meet near 2.7x with accelerated diligence.", "deadline": "45-day triage: align cfo cash tests with cto and chro risk windows.", "retention_plan": "Milestone-based retention: pay at signing, 90d, and close for key dev talent."}, "swd_version": 17}}