Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 1,696 Bytes
a9e38d4 d4b1022 a9e38d4 4597772 a9e38d4 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 | ---
title: OpenMark
emoji: π―
colorFrom: blue
colorTo: purple
sdk: static
pinned: true
short_description: "AI model benchmarking platform β 100+ models on YOUR tasks"
tags:
- benchmarking
- llm
- ai
- model-evaluation
---
# OpenMark β AI Model Benchmarking Platform
**Stop trusting leaderboards. Benchmark your own work.**
[OpenMark](https://openmark.ai) lets you benchmark 100+ AI models on your own tasks with deterministic scoring, stability metrics, and real API cost tracking.
## What Makes OpenMark Different
- **Your tasks, not generic tests** β Write any evaluation task (code review, classification, creative writing, vision analysis) and test models against it
- **Deterministic scoring** β Same prompt, same score, every time. No vibes-based evaluation
- **Stability metrics** β See which models change their answer across runs (hint: many do)
- **Real API costs** β Know exactly what each model costs per task, not just per million tokens
- **100+ models** β OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral, xAI, and more. Side-by-side comparison
## Why It Matters
Generic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, MATH) test models on tasks you'll never use. The only benchmark that matters is yours: does this model, with this prompt, for this task, give you the result you expect β reliably and affordably?
## Try It
π **[openmark.ai](https://openmark.ai)** β Free to start.
## Links
- π [Website](https://openmark.ai)
- π [Why Generic Benchmarks Are Useless](https://dev.to/openmarkai/i-benchmarked-10-ai-models-on-reading-human-emotions-3m0b)
- π¦ [Twitter/X](https://x.com/OpenMarkAI)
- πΌ [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/openmark-ai) |