\section{Mutual Information Analysis of Table Data} \label{sec:motivation} Table data is widely used in real-world applications, yet its structural properties for LLM training remain underexplored. Unlike natural language with sequential tokens and decaying contextual relevance, table data exhibits rigid column-wise structures that induce distinct dependency patterns. We provide an information-theoretic framework to analyze long-context dependencies in table data. We show that tables preserve \textbf{periodic non-vanishing} structural dependencies, in contrast to the power-law decay observed in natural language. To our knowledge, this is the first mutual information-based analysis of tabular dependency structures. These properties make table data well suited for training long-context reasoning capability of LLMs. \subsection{Background: Dependency Decay in Natural Language} For natural language sequences, empirical studies~\cite{li1989mutual,lin2016critical} demonstrate that Mutual Information (MI) between tokens decays polynomially with distance ($d$): \begin{equation} I_{text}(d) \sim C \cdot d^{-\alpha}, \quad \text{with } \alpha \approx 0.5 \label{eq:powerlaw} \end{equation} This power-law decay, which we adopt as a modeling assumption for natural language throughout this work, implies $\lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} I_{text}(d) = 0$. A natural question arises: \textit{does table data exhibit the same decay pattern?} \subsection{Setup: Table Data and Linearization} A table $\mathcal{T}$ is an $n \times m$ structure with column headers $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1, \ldots, H_m\}$ and cells $\{T_{i,j}\}_{i \in [n], j \in [m]}$, where $[n] := \{1, \ldots, n\}$ and each cell $T_{i,j}$ is drawn from a column-specific distribution $P_j$. The row-major linearization $\phi: \mathcal{T} \rightarrow W_{1:L}$ maps a table to a token sequence $\phi(\mathcal{T})$: \begin{equation*} [H_1, \ldots, H_m, \underbrace{T_{1,1}, \ldots, T_{1,m}}_{\text{row 1}}, \underbrace{T_{2,1}, \ldots, T_{2,m}}_{\text{row 2}}, \ldots, T_{n,m}] \end{equation*} with total length $L = m(n+1)$, where $W_t$ denotes the $t$-th token. For position $t > m$ in the data region, let $\text{col}(t) \in [m]$ denote its column index. For lag $d \in \{1, \ldots, L-m-1\}$, define the average MI over the data region: \begin{align*} \bar{I}_{table}(d) &= \frac{1}{|\mathcal{S}_d|} \sum_{t \in \mathcal{S}_d} I(W_t; W_{t+d}), \\ \mathcal{S}_d &= \{t : m < t \leq L - d\} \end{align*} Our analysis rests on the following assumptions (formal statements in Appendix~\ref{app:assumptions}): \begin{itemize} \item[(A1)] \textit{Column Semantic Consistency}: All cells in column $j$ share the same distribution $P_j$. \item[(A2)] \textit{Column Distribution Distinctiveness}: Different columns have distinguishable distributions, i.e., $D_{KL}(P_j \| P_k) > 0$ for $j \neq k$, where $D_{KL}$ denotes the Kullback-Leibler divergence. \end{itemize} We do \textbf{not} assume that cells within the same column are conditionally independent; our results hold regardless of intra-column dependencies (see Remark~\ref{rmk:intra_col} in the Appendix). \subsection{Periodic Non-Vanishing Dependencies} We first introduce a key factor. Let $J \sim \text{Uniform}([m])$ be a randomly chosen column index. \begin{definition}[Same-Column Mutual Information] \label{def:same_col_mi} The same-column MI is defined as: \begin{equation} I^{same} := I(T_{i,J}; T_{k,J}) \end{equation} \end{definition} As shown in Lemma~\ref{lem:same_col}, under Assumptions (A1)--(A2): (i) $I^{same} > 0$, and (ii) $I(T_{i,J}; T_{k,J}) = I^{same}$ for any $i \neq k$, i.e., same-column MI is independent of row distance. The magnitude of $I^{same}$ depends on how distinguishable the column distributions are. As characterized in Proposition~\ref{prop:isame_characterization}, $I^{same}$ is determined by the cross-column variance $\sum_a \text{Var}_j[P_j(a)]$, where $\text{Var}_j[\cdot]$ denotes variance across columns. When column distributions are highly distinct, this variance is large, yielding larger $I^{same}$. \begin{theorem}[Periodic Non-Vanishing Dependency] \label{thm:main} Under Assumptions (A1)--(A2), for any table with $n$ rows and $m$ columns: \begin{equation} \bar{I}_{table}(km) = I^{same} > 0, \quad \forall k \in \{1, 2, \ldots, n-1\} \end{equation} That is, $\bar{I}_{table}(d)$ attains periodic peaks of constant height $I^{same}$ at every multiple of the column count $m$. \end{theorem} Note that non-vanishing property holds \textit{specifically at periodic lags} $d = km$; at others, average MI may be smaller. \begin{corollary}[Asymptotic Non-Decay] \label{cor:liminf} For a sequence of tables with $n \to \infty$ rows and fixed $m$ columns, under Assumptions (A1)--(A2): \begin{equation} \liminf_{d \rightarrow \infty} \bar{I}_{table}(d) \geq I^{same} > 0 \end{equation} This contrasts starkly with natural language, where $\lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} I_{text}(d) = 0$ based on Eq.~\eqref{eq:powerlaw}. \end{corollary} \begin{corollary}[Asymptotic Dominance over Natural Language] \label{cor:ratio} Under the power-law assumption Eq.~\eqref{eq:powerlaw} for natural language and Assumptions (A1)--(A2) for tables: \begin{equation} \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\bar{I}_{table}(km)}{I_{text}(km)} = +\infty \end{equation} \end{corollary} \subsection{Effective Dependency Distance} \begin{definition}[Effective Dependency Distance~\cite{liu2008dependency}] \label{def:eff_dist} Given threshold $\tau > 0$: $D_{eff}(\tau) = \sup\{d : I(d) \geq \tau\}$. \end{definition} \begin{theorem}[Effective Distance Comparison] \label{thm:eff_dist} Under the power-law assumption Eq.~\eqref{eq:powerlaw} for natural language and Assumptions (A1)--(A2) for tables, for any $\tau \in (0, I^{same})$: \begin{equation} D_{eff}^{table}(\tau) = +\infty, \quad \text{while} \quad D_{eff}^{text}(\tau) < +\infty \end{equation} \end{theorem} This result shows that for any threshold $\tau < I^{same}$, tabular dependencies exceed $\tau$ at infinitely many lags (specifically, at all $d = km$), whereas natural language dependencies eventually fall below $\tau$ permanently. These results indicate that structured table data with periodic non-vanishing structures exhibits strong potential for long-context reasoning.