Spaces:
Running
Running
Improve dataset realism and consolidate project status log
Browse files- LABEL_AUDIT.md +0 -56
- MARCH30_STATUS.md +0 -117
- PROJECT_STATUS.md +137 -0
- README.md +23 -0
- data/dataset.json +21 -21
LABEL_AUDIT.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
# Label Audit Notes
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
This file records the March 31 and April 1 label-and-grader pass on the Roopal-owned files:
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
- `data/dataset.json`
|
| 6 |
-
- `server/tasks.py`
|
| 7 |
-
- `server/grader.py`
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
## Dataset Decisions
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
### Tightened ambiguity cases
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
- `ticket-022`
|
| 14 |
-
Reworded to make the billing-versus-application ambiguity clearer while keeping the chosen label as `application_support`.
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
- `ticket-027`
|
| 17 |
-
Reworded to make the vendor-offer ambiguity clearer between `general_inquiry` and `service_request`.
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
- `ticket-029`
|
| 20 |
-
Reworded to make the seat-expansion versus prorating ambiguity clearer and changed `resolution_action` from `fulfill` to `assign`.
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
- `ticket-040`
|
| 23 |
-
Reworded to make the feature-gap versus support-issue ambiguity clearer.
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
### Corrected label consistency
|
| 26 |
-
|
| 27 |
-
- `ticket-026`
|
| 28 |
-
Changed from `feature_request` / `application_team` to `general_inquiry` / `service_desk` because it is a thank-you note, not a product change request.
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
## Task Wording Changes
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
The task instructions in `server/tasks.py` were tightened so they now:
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
- sound more like helpdesk triage
|
| 35 |
-
- emphasize choosing the single best label
|
| 36 |
-
- describe operational priority more clearly
|
| 37 |
-
- describe full triage more concretely for Task 3
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
## Grader Changes
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
The grader was polished by:
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
- making task weights explicit in `TASK_WEIGHTS`
|
| 44 |
-
- adding partial-credit pairs for:
|
| 45 |
-
- `application_support` vs `feature_request`
|
| 46 |
-
- `general_inquiry` vs `service_request`
|
| 47 |
-
- keeping the scoring deterministic and task-specific
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
## Intent
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
These edits are meant to improve:
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
- dataset realism
|
| 54 |
-
- label consistency
|
| 55 |
-
- hard-task ambiguity quality
|
| 56 |
-
- reviewability for judges and teammates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARCH30_STATUS.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,117 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
# March 30 Status Report
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
This file captures the code checkpoint completed for March 30, 2026 so both Codex sessions can compare against the same source of truth.
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
## Scope Completed
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
The March 30 code checkpoint is complete for the foundational files named in `ROADMAP.md`:
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
- `models.py`
|
| 10 |
-
- `server/tasks.py`
|
| 11 |
-
- `server/grader.py`
|
| 12 |
-
- `server/environment.py`
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
Related supporting files were also aligned:
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
- `client.py`
|
| 17 |
-
- `server/app.py`
|
| 18 |
-
- `inference.py`
|
| 19 |
-
- `vocabulary.py`
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
## What Is Locked
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
### Team and project identity
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
- Team: Hackstreet Boys
|
| 26 |
-
- Members: Roopal Guha Neogi, Suyash Kumar
|
| 27 |
-
- Domain: IT Helpdesk Ticket Routing
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Frozen class names
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
- `HelpdeskTicketRecord`
|
| 32 |
-
- `HelpdeskTicketAction`
|
| 33 |
-
- `HelpdeskTicketObservation`
|
| 34 |
-
- `HelpdeskTicketState`
|
| 35 |
-
- `HelpdeskTicketRoutingEnvironment`
|
| 36 |
-
- `HelpdeskTicketEnvClient`
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
### Frozen field names
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
- `ticket_id`
|
| 41 |
-
- `title`
|
| 42 |
-
- `requester`
|
| 43 |
-
- `description`
|
| 44 |
-
- `issue_type`
|
| 45 |
-
- `priority`
|
| 46 |
-
- `assignment_group`
|
| 47 |
-
- `resolution_action`
|
| 48 |
-
- `related_ticket_id`
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
## Code That Exists Now
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
### `vocabulary.py`
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
Shared frozen constants now live in one place:
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
- team metadata
|
| 57 |
-
- environment names
|
| 58 |
-
- issue types
|
| 59 |
-
- priorities
|
| 60 |
-
- assignment groups
|
| 61 |
-
- resolution actions
|
| 62 |
-
- default issue-type mappings used by inference
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
### `models.py`
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
The typed models are defined and the vocabulary is enforced through validators, so unsupported labels should fail fast instead of silently drifting.
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
### `server/tasks.py`
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
All three tasks are defined with locked names, instructions, and allowed fields.
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
### `server/grader.py`
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
Deterministic scoring is in place with:
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
- partial credit for near-miss `issue_type`
|
| 77 |
-
- proximity scoring for `priority`
|
| 78 |
-
- exact match for `assignment_group`
|
| 79 |
-
- exact match for `resolution_action`
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
### `server/environment.py`
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
The environment implements:
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
- queue sampling
|
| 86 |
-
- reset flow
|
| 87 |
-
- step flow
|
| 88 |
-
- state tracking
|
| 89 |
-
- final trajectory reward handoff
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
### `inference.py`
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
The baseline runner is aligned to the locked vocabulary and supports:
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
- LLM mode
|
| 96 |
-
- heuristic mode
|
| 97 |
-
- task loop over all 3 tasks
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
## Expected Agreement For The Other Codex Session
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
Your teammate's Codex should agree on all of the following:
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
1. the schema names above are frozen
|
| 104 |
-
2. the vocabulary now has a single source of truth in `vocabulary.py`
|
| 105 |
-
3. no one should rename labels after this checkpoint
|
| 106 |
-
4. future work should build on these names, not replace them
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
## What Is Not Verified Yet
|
| 109 |
-
|
| 110 |
-
This checkpoint is a code-and-consistency checkpoint, not a runtime-complete checkpoint.
|
| 111 |
-
|
| 112 |
-
Still pending:
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
- local execution
|
| 115 |
-
- heuristic baseline run
|
| 116 |
-
- Docker validation
|
| 117 |
-
- final benchmark numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECT_STATUS.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Project Status
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
This is the canonical running status file for the repo.
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
Use this file for future progress updates instead of creating new date-specific status files.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
## March 30, 2026
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
Status: complete
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
Scope completed:
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
- locked team name, domain, and vocabulary
|
| 14 |
+
- aligned the foundational schema and environment surface
|
| 15 |
+
- froze the core class names and field names
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
Core files aligned:
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
- `models.py`
|
| 20 |
+
- `server/tasks.py`
|
| 21 |
+
- `server/grader.py`
|
| 22 |
+
- `server/environment.py`
|
| 23 |
+
- `client.py`
|
| 24 |
+
- `server/app.py`
|
| 25 |
+
- `inference.py`
|
| 26 |
+
- `vocabulary.py`
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
Key checkpoint outcome:
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
- the project had a single vocabulary source of truth and no remaining schema disagreement
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## March 31, 2026
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
Status: complete
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Roopal-side work completed:
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
- audited `data/dataset.json` end to end
|
| 39 |
+
- tightened ambiguity wording in selected tickets
|
| 40 |
+
- reviewed task wording in `server/tasks.py`
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
Representative dataset decisions:
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
- `ticket-022` kept as `application_support` while making the billing-versus-application ambiguity clearer
|
| 45 |
+
- `ticket-027` kept intentionally ambiguous between `general_inquiry` and `service_request`
|
| 46 |
+
- `ticket-029` was refined to better express seat-expansion versus prorating ambiguity
|
| 47 |
+
- `ticket-040` was kept as `feature_request` while clarifying that some readers could still interpret it as `application_support`
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
Task wording changes:
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
- Task 1 was tightened to emphasize selecting the single best IT issue type
|
| 52 |
+
- Task 2 now explicitly asks for operational priority, not just generic urgency
|
| 53 |
+
- Task 3 wording was refined to describe full helpdesk routing more concretely
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
Shared checkpoint outcome:
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
- no schema changes were still pending after the review pass
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
## April 1, 2026
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
Status: complete
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
Roopal-side work completed:
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
- polished `server/grader.py`
|
| 66 |
+
- made task weights explicit
|
| 67 |
+
- refined hard-task partial-credit behavior
|
| 68 |
+
- finished remaining dataset label corrections
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
Important label/grader notes:
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
- `ticket-026` was corrected to `general_inquiry` routed to `service_desk`
|
| 73 |
+
- Task 2 weights were fixed at `issue_type` 60% and `priority` 40%
|
| 74 |
+
- Task 3 weights were fixed at `issue_type` 35%, `priority` 20%, `assignment_group` 25%, and `resolution_action` 20%
|
| 75 |
+
- partial-credit pairs were added for `application_support` vs `feature_request`
|
| 76 |
+
- partial-credit pairs were added for `general_inquiry` vs `service_request`
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
Shared checkpoint outcome:
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
- the docs and code agreed on the exact task labels and field vocabulary
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
## April 2, 2026
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
Status: complete
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
Roopal-side work completed:
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
- improved `README.md`
|
| 89 |
+
- improved `KNOWLEDGE.md`
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Packaging and metadata alignment completed in repo state:
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
- `openenv.yaml` aligned with runtime naming and dependency expectations
|
| 94 |
+
- `pyproject.toml` and `requirements.txt` use the same OpenEnv dependency source
|
| 95 |
+
- `server/Dockerfile` installs the local package and documented runtime dependencies
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
Shared checkpoint outcome:
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
- docs and code tell the same IT helpdesk ticket routing story
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
## April 3, 2026
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
Status: Roopal work complete, shared validation underway
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
Roopal-side work completed:
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
- performed a dataset realism pass on `data/dataset.json`
|
| 108 |
+
- replaced several low-realism spam examples with clearer helpdesk-inbox phrasing
|
| 109 |
+
- cleaned visible mojibake dashes from ticket titles
|
| 110 |
+
- added explicit easy, medium, and hard dataset examples to `README.md`
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
Runtime validation notes recorded from the local repo state:
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
- local `reset()` and `inference.py` validation exposed a UTF-8 BOM issue in dataset loading
|
| 115 |
+
- `server/tasks.py` was updated to read `data/dataset.json` with `utf-8-sig`
|
| 116 |
+
- the heuristic baseline then completed successfully
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
Local heuristic baseline on the validated repo state:
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
- Task 1: `1.0000`
|
| 121 |
+
- Task 2: `0.8800`
|
| 122 |
+
- Task 3: `0.9400`
|
| 123 |
+
- Overall: `0.9400`
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
Shared checkpoint outcome so far:
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
- the first bug triage item was identified and fixed
|
| 128 |
+
- a rerun on the latest fully merged branch is still recommended before treating benchmark numbers as final
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
## Open Items
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
Still pending after the current checkpoint:
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
- rerun runtime validation on the latest shared branch after all pending merges land
|
| 135 |
+
- perform a Docker smoke test from the merged repo state
|
| 136 |
+
- do the April 4 issue-fix pass from any runtime feedback
|
| 137 |
+
- record final benchmark numbers only after the merged-state rerun
|
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -159,6 +159,29 @@ It includes:
|
|
| 159 |
- feature requests
|
| 160 |
- follow-up cases linked through `related_ticket_id`
|
| 161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 162 |
## Repository Layout
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
```text
|
|
|
|
| 159 |
- feature requests
|
| 160 |
- follow-up cases linked through `related_ticket_id`
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
+
## Difficulty Coverage
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
The difficulty ladder is visible both in the task fields and in the dataset itself.
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
Easy-style examples:
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
- `ticket-020`: straightforward general inquiry with low urgency and a clean `general_inquiry` label
|
| 169 |
+
- `ticket-041`: clear onboarding request for a new contractor account
|
| 170 |
+
- `ticket-044`: obvious phishing-style lure that should map cleanly to `spam_phishing`
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
Medium-style examples:
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
- `ticket-001`: billing dispute that still requires the agent to judge urgency correctly
|
| 175 |
+
- `ticket-028`: application incident where the issue type is clear but priority still matters
|
| 176 |
+
- `ticket-036`: procurement-style proof-of-concept request that should route as a `service_request`
|
| 177 |
+
|
| 178 |
+
Hard-style examples:
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
- `ticket-022`: mixed billing and application signals in one ticket
|
| 181 |
+
- `ticket-029`: seat expansion combined with a prorating question
|
| 182 |
+
- `ticket-038`: follow-up billing thread with escalated urgency
|
| 183 |
+
- `ticket-045`: repeated account suspension thread with legal-escalation pressure
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
## Repository Layout
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
```text
|
data/dataset.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@
|
|
| 49 |
},
|
| 50 |
{
|
| 51 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-005",
|
| 52 |
-
"title": "
|
| 53 |
-
"requester": "
|
| 54 |
-
"description": "
|
| 55 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 56 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 57 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
|
|
| 73 |
},
|
| 74 |
{
|
| 75 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-007",
|
| 76 |
-
"title": "GDPR data deletion request
|
| 77 |
"requester": "legal@eurocorp.de",
|
| 78 |
"description": "Per GDPR Article 17, we request deletion of all personal data associated with our account within 30 days. Failure to comply may result in regulatory action.",
|
| 79 |
"issue_type": "security_compliance",
|
|
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@
|
|
| 85 |
},
|
| 86 |
{
|
| 87 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-008",
|
| 88 |
-
"title": "
|
| 89 |
-
"requester": "
|
| 90 |
-
"description": "
|
| 91 |
"issue_type": "onboarding",
|
| 92 |
"priority": "medium",
|
| 93 |
"assignment_group": "onboarding_ops",
|
|
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@
|
|
| 145 |
},
|
| 146 |
{
|
| 147 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-013",
|
| 148 |
-
"title": "
|
| 149 |
-
"requester": "
|
| 150 |
-
"description": "
|
| 151 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 152 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 153 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
|
|
| 157 |
},
|
| 158 |
{
|
| 159 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-014",
|
| 160 |
-
"title": "Audit report findings
|
| 161 |
"requester": "audit@compliancepartners.com",
|
| 162 |
"description": "The SOC2 audit uncovered three medium-severity findings. Remediation evidence is due by end of week.",
|
| 163 |
"issue_type": "security_compliance",
|
|
@@ -229,9 +229,9 @@
|
|
| 229 |
},
|
| 230 |
{
|
| 231 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-020",
|
| 232 |
-
"title": "General inquiry about
|
| 233 |
-
"requester": "
|
| 234 |
-
"description": "
|
| 235 |
"issue_type": "general_inquiry",
|
| 236 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 237 |
"assignment_group": "service_desk",
|
|
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@
|
|
| 373 |
},
|
| 374 |
{
|
| 375 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-032",
|
| 376 |
-
"title": "Penetration test results
|
| 377 |
"requester": "security@redteam-auditors.com",
|
| 378 |
"description": "Our pentest revealed two critical and five high-severity vulnerabilities in your API endpoints. Full report attached. Remediation should begin immediately.",
|
| 379 |
"issue_type": "security_compliance",
|
|
@@ -433,9 +433,9 @@
|
|
| 433 |
},
|
| 434 |
{
|
| 435 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-037",
|
| 436 |
-
"title": "
|
| 437 |
-
"requester": "
|
| 438 |
-
"description": "
|
| 439 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 440 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 441 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
@@ -517,9 +517,9 @@
|
|
| 517 |
},
|
| 518 |
{
|
| 519 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-044",
|
| 520 |
-
"title": "
|
| 521 |
-
"requester": "
|
| 522 |
-
"description": "
|
| 523 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 524 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 525 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
},
|
| 50 |
{
|
| 51 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-005",
|
| 52 |
+
"title": "Spam email promising guaranteed crypto returns hit support inbox",
|
| 53 |
+
"requester": "shared-inbox@northstar-retail.com",
|
| 54 |
+
"description": "A promotional email promising instant crypto income landed in the shared support inbox. It does not reference any legitimate customer account or business request.",
|
| 55 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 56 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 57 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
},
|
| 74 |
{
|
| 75 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-007",
|
| 76 |
+
"title": "GDPR data deletion request - 30 day deadline",
|
| 77 |
"requester": "legal@eurocorp.de",
|
| 78 |
"description": "Per GDPR Article 17, we request deletion of all personal data associated with our account within 30 days. Failure to comply may result in regulatory action.",
|
| 79 |
"issue_type": "security_compliance",
|
|
|
|
| 85 |
},
|
| 86 |
{
|
| 87 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-008",
|
| 88 |
+
"title": "Kickoff onboarding session for newly activated account",
|
| 89 |
+
"requester": "admin@brightpath.io",
|
| 90 |
+
"description": "We activated our account this week and need an onboarding call plus admin setup guidance for six internal users.",
|
| 91 |
"issue_type": "onboarding",
|
| 92 |
"priority": "medium",
|
| 93 |
"assignment_group": "onboarding_ops",
|
|
|
|
| 145 |
},
|
| 146 |
{
|
| 147 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-013",
|
| 148 |
+
"title": "Suspicious giveaway message forwarded from shared mailbox",
|
| 149 |
+
"requester": "shared-inbox@harborair.io",
|
| 150 |
+
"description": "The shared mailbox received a message claiming the recipient had won a free vacation and urging an immediate click-through. It appears to be pure spam.",
|
| 151 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 152 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 153 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
|
|
| 157 |
},
|
| 158 |
{
|
| 159 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-014",
|
| 160 |
+
"title": "Audit report findings - action required by Friday",
|
| 161 |
"requester": "audit@compliancepartners.com",
|
| 162 |
"description": "The SOC2 audit uncovered three medium-severity findings. Remediation evidence is due by end of week.",
|
| 163 |
"issue_type": "security_compliance",
|
|
|
|
| 229 |
},
|
| 230 |
{
|
| 231 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-020",
|
| 232 |
+
"title": "General inquiry about platform admin capabilities",
|
| 233 |
+
"requester": "ops-eval@greenleaf.org",
|
| 234 |
+
"description": "Our operations team is doing a lightweight vendor scan and wants a short overview of admin controls, reporting, and deployment options.",
|
| 235 |
"issue_type": "general_inquiry",
|
| 236 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 237 |
"assignment_group": "service_desk",
|
|
|
|
| 373 |
},
|
| 374 |
{
|
| 375 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-032",
|
| 376 |
+
"title": "Penetration test results - critical vulnerabilities found",
|
| 377 |
"requester": "security@redteam-auditors.com",
|
| 378 |
"description": "Our pentest revealed two critical and five high-severity vulnerabilities in your API endpoints. Full report attached. Remediation should begin immediately.",
|
| 379 |
"issue_type": "security_compliance",
|
|
|
|
| 433 |
},
|
| 434 |
{
|
| 435 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-037",
|
| 436 |
+
"title": "Obvious diploma scam reached admissions support inbox",
|
| 437 |
+
"requester": "support@midcity.edu",
|
| 438 |
+
"description": "An unsolicited message promising a degree in two weeks arrived in the support mailbox. It is not tied to any customer case and should be ignored.",
|
| 439 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 440 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 441 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|
|
|
|
| 517 |
},
|
| 518 |
{
|
| 519 |
"ticket_id": "ticket-044",
|
| 520 |
+
"title": "Credential phishing message impersonating security team",
|
| 521 |
+
"requester": "helpdesk@startupxyz.io",
|
| 522 |
+
"description": "A message claiming the account was compromised asked users to click a verification link immediately. It appears to be a classic credential phishing lure.",
|
| 523 |
"issue_type": "spam_phishing",
|
| 524 |
"priority": "low",
|
| 525 |
"assignment_group": "security_team",
|