Spaces:
Running
Running
Merge branch 'codex/apr5-apr6-roopal'
Browse files- ROADMAP.md +150 -232
ROADMAP.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
# Hackstreet Boys Roadmap
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
## Team
|
| 4 |
|
|
@@ -8,54 +8,64 @@
|
|
| 8 |
- Suyash Kumar
|
| 9 |
- Submission deadline: April 8, 2026, 11:59 PM IST
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-
##
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
- scores well on real-world utility
|
| 17 |
-
- has deterministic, defensible grading
|
| 18 |
-
- is easy for judges to understand and rerun
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
-
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
- agree that no one changes schema names casually after this point
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
##
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
-
|
| 37 |
-
- `
|
| 38 |
-
-
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
-
|
| 43 |
-
-
|
| 44 |
-
- `inference.py`
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
- matching task labels
|
| 50 |
-
- matching issue-type vocabulary
|
| 51 |
-
- no unresolved schema disagreements
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
### Roopal ownership
|
| 58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 59 |
- `data/dataset.json`
|
| 60 |
- `server/tasks.py`
|
| 61 |
- `server/grader.py`
|
|
@@ -63,17 +73,24 @@ The safest way for two people to work separately and merge cleanly is to divide
|
|
| 63 |
- `KNOWLEDGE.md`
|
| 64 |
- `MENTAL_MODEL.md`
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
-
|
| 69 |
-
-
|
| 70 |
-
-
|
| 71 |
-
- grader realism
|
| 72 |
-
- documentation clarity
|
| 73 |
-
- judging-story polish
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
### Suyash ownership
|
| 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
- `models.py`
|
| 78 |
- `server/environment.py`
|
| 79 |
- `server/app.py`
|
|
@@ -85,255 +102,156 @@ Primary responsibilities:
|
|
| 85 |
- `pyproject.toml`
|
| 86 |
- `requirements.txt`
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
-
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
- runtime correctness
|
| 91 |
-
- OpenEnv interface
|
| 92 |
-
- inference reliability
|
| 93 |
-
- Docker and deployment readiness
|
| 94 |
-
- integration behavior
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
## Merge Strategy
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
To keep parallel work easy to combine:
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
1. avoid editing the same file on the same day unless planned
|
| 101 |
-
2. use one shared terminology list and do not invent alternate labels
|
| 102 |
-
3. sync once daily with a 10 minute review of:
|
| 103 |
-
- changed files
|
| 104 |
-
- open blockers
|
| 105 |
-
- any schema changes
|
| 106 |
-
4. freeze the dataset schema early
|
| 107 |
-
5. freeze the action and observation field names early
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
## Shared Source Of Truth
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
These files should be treated as authoritative:
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
- `README.md` for the public project story
|
| 114 |
-
- `PLAN.md` for project requirements and definition of done
|
| 115 |
-
- `MENTAL_MODEL.md` for the current system shape
|
| 116 |
-
- `openenv.yaml` for environment metadata
|
| 117 |
-
- `server/tasks.py` and `server/grader.py` for task rules
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
## AI Usage Policy
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
AI is permitted, so use it aggressively where it saves time, but do not outsource judgment.
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
Good uses of AI:
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
- draft clearer task descriptions
|
| 126 |
-
- propose additional hard-case tickets
|
| 127 |
-
- suggest edge cases and label audits
|
| 128 |
-
- improve prompts in `inference.py`
|
| 129 |
-
- generate test ideas and checklists
|
| 130 |
-
- improve README structure and wording
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
Human review required for:
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
- final dataset labels
|
| 135 |
-
- grader weights and partial-credit rules
|
| 136 |
-
- any claims in README
|
| 137 |
-
- final benchmark numbers
|
| 138 |
-
- submission metadata and deployment settings
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
-
## Submission Criteria Checklist
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
### Must pass
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
- environment starts correctly
|
| 145 |
-
- `reset()`, `step()`, and `state()` behave correctly
|
| 146 |
-
- 3 tasks exist and are meaningfully different
|
| 147 |
-
- grader scores are in `[0.0, 1.0]`
|
| 148 |
-
- `inference.py` runs without error
|
| 149 |
-
- Docker builds and starts
|
| 150 |
-
- docs are complete and current
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
### Must score well
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
- the task feels like real IT helpdesk work
|
| 155 |
-
- the hard task is genuinely harder
|
| 156 |
-
- the grader gives partial credit in sensible ways
|
| 157 |
-
- the environment is easy to understand and rerun
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
-
-
|
| 164 |
-
-
|
| 165 |
-
- agree on ownership split
|
| 166 |
-
- start coding the core schema and task logic immediately after the vocabulary lock
|
| 167 |
-
- target a same-day checkpoint on:
|
| 168 |
-
- `models.py`
|
| 169 |
-
- `server/tasks.py`
|
| 170 |
-
- `server/grader.py`
|
| 171 |
-
- `server/environment.py`
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
-
###
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
-
- tighten ambiguous cases
|
| 179 |
-
- review task wording in `server/tasks.py`
|
| 180 |
-
- continue code work in `server/grader.py` if partial-credit tuning is still needed
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
-
|
| 185 |
-
- check that the field names align everywhere
|
| 186 |
-
- continue code work in `inference.py` and `server/app.py`
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 189 |
|
| 190 |
-
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
-
-
|
| 197 |
-
- confirm hard-task logic and partial-credit behavior
|
| 198 |
-
- finish any remaining dataset label corrections
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
-
|
| 201 |
|
| 202 |
-
|
| 203 |
-
- confirm heuristic mode uses the new ticket vocabulary consistently
|
| 204 |
-
- finish runtime code adjustments in `client.py`, `server/app.py`, and `server/reward.py`
|
| 205 |
|
| 206 |
-
|
| 207 |
-
|
| 208 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
-
##
|
| 211 |
-
|
| 212 |
-
Roopal:
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
-
|
| 215 |
-
- improve `KNOWLEDGE.md`
|
| 216 |
-
|
| 217 |
-
Suyash:
|
| 218 |
-
|
| 219 |
-
- validate `openenv.yaml`
|
| 220 |
-
- validate `server/Dockerfile`
|
| 221 |
-
- validate dependency files
|
| 222 |
-
|
| 223 |
-
Shared checkpoint:
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
-
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
-
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
Roopal:
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 |
-
-
|
| 232 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 |
Suyash:
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
-
-
|
| 237 |
-
-
|
| 238 |
-
-
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
Shared checkpoint:
|
| 241 |
|
| 242 |
-
-
|
| 243 |
-
|
| 244 |
-
|
| 245 |
-
|
| 246 |
-
If you are wondering "should we still be planning or should we code now?", the answer is:
|
| 247 |
|
| 248 |
-
|
| 249 |
-
- **April 5 to April 6, 2026 = validation, docs, and score recording**
|
| 250 |
-
- **April 7 to April 8, 2026 = freeze, smoke tests, and submission**
|
| 251 |
-
|
| 252 |
-
### April 4, 2026
|
| 253 |
-
|
| 254 |
-
Roopal:
|
| 255 |
-
|
| 256 |
-
- fix data, wording, and documentation issues from runtime feedback
|
| 257 |
-
|
| 258 |
-
Suyash:
|
| 259 |
-
|
| 260 |
-
- fix environment, inference, and Docker issues from runtime feedback
|
| 261 |
-
|
| 262 |
-
Shared checkpoint:
|
| 263 |
|
| 264 |
-
|
| 265 |
|
| 266 |
-
|
| 267 |
|
| 268 |
Roopal:
|
| 269 |
|
| 270 |
-
-
|
| 271 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 272 |
|
| 273 |
Suyash:
|
| 274 |
|
| 275 |
-
-
|
| 276 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 277 |
|
| 278 |
Shared checkpoint:
|
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
-
-
|
| 281 |
-
|
| 282 |
-
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
-
|
| 285 |
-
- verify every required file is present
|
| 286 |
-
- check for stale claims and outdated wording
|
| 287 |
|
| 288 |
-
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 |
-
-
|
| 291 |
-
- only bug fixes, validation, and submission packaging
|
| 292 |
-
- verify final docs, metadata, and benchmark numbers
|
| 293 |
|
| 294 |
-
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 |
-
-
|
| 297 |
-
-
|
| 298 |
-
-
|
| 299 |
|
| 300 |
-
|
| 301 |
|
| 302 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 303 |
|
| 304 |
-
|
| 305 |
-
2. do not change task labels after April 2, 2026 without both agreeing
|
| 306 |
-
3. do not edit ownership files casually
|
| 307 |
-
4. if one person must touch the other person's file, call it out before doing it
|
| 308 |
-
5. keep a short daily changelog in chat or a shared note
|
| 309 |
|
| 310 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 311 |
|
| 312 |
-
##
|
| 313 |
|
| 314 |
-
|
| 315 |
-
- docs are submission-ready
|
| 316 |
-
- the hard task feels meaningfully harder than the easy and medium tasks
|
| 317 |
|
| 318 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 319 |
|
| 320 |
-
|
| 321 |
-
- the inference script works in heuristic mode
|
| 322 |
-
- Docker and metadata are in good shape
|
| 323 |
|
| 324 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 325 |
|
| 326 |
-
|
| 327 |
|
| 328 |
-
|
| 329 |
-
|
| 330 |
-
3. valid grader and tasks
|
| 331 |
-
4. Docker and metadata
|
| 332 |
-
5. README clarity
|
| 333 |
-
6. extra polish
|
| 334 |
|
| 335 |
## Simple Rule To Remember
|
| 336 |
|
| 337 |
-
Roopal owns the story and
|
| 338 |
-
Suyash owns the runtime and
|
| 339 |
-
Both
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Hackstreet Boys Final Roadmap
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
## Team
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
- Suyash Kumar
|
| 9 |
- Submission deadline: April 8, 2026, 11:59 PM IST
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
## How To Use This File
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
- `PROJECT_STATUS.md` is the canonical log of completed work.
|
| 14 |
+
- This roadmap is now the remaining execution plan from the current merged repo state to final submission.
|
| 15 |
+
- `analysis/comp.md`, `analysis/comp_know.md`, and `analysis/inference.md` are internal prioritization notes only. Use them to guide priorities, but do not mention competitor repos in public-facing docs.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
## Current Repo State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
+
The repo has already established the core submission shape:
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
- locked IT helpdesk ticket routing domain
|
| 22 |
+
- locked vocabulary and task names
|
| 23 |
+
- 3-task difficulty ladder
|
| 24 |
+
- deterministic grading with partial credit
|
| 25 |
+
- working heuristic baseline
|
| 26 |
+
- merged local validation on `/health`, `/tasks`, and `inference.py`
|
| 27 |
+
- current local benchmark reference:
|
| 28 |
+
- Task 1: `1.0000`
|
| 29 |
+
- Task 2: `0.8800`
|
| 30 |
+
- Task 3: `0.9400`
|
| 31 |
+
- Overall: `0.9400`
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
The remaining work is no longer broad feature development. The remaining work is:
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
1. final packaging and deployment readiness
|
| 36 |
+
2. clean rerun evidence
|
| 37 |
+
3. small high-impact improvements that strengthen submission quality without risking regressions
|
| 38 |
+
4. freeze and submit early
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
## Submission Gates That Must Be True
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
These are the practical must-pass items from `PLAN.md` and `KNOWLEDGE.md`:
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
- the environment starts correctly
|
| 45 |
+
- `reset()`, `step()`, and `state()` behave correctly
|
| 46 |
+
- 3 tasks exist and remain meaningfully different
|
| 47 |
+
- grader scores stay in `[0.0, 1.0]`
|
| 48 |
+
- `inference.py` runs reproducibly without crashing
|
| 49 |
+
- Docker builds and starts cleanly
|
| 50 |
+
- docs and metadata are current
|
| 51 |
+
- the repo is easy for judges to understand and rerun
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
## Final Priority Order
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
If time gets tight, prioritize in this exact order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
+
1. merged Docker and deployment validation
|
| 58 |
+
2. clean-copy rerun
|
| 59 |
+
3. README and metadata readiness for Hugging Face / OpenEnv deployment
|
| 60 |
+
4. small reward and observation improvements that strengthen RL value
|
| 61 |
+
5. extra polish
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
## Ownership From Now Until Submission
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
### Roopal ownership
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
+
Files already owned:
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
- `data/dataset.json`
|
| 70 |
- `server/tasks.py`
|
| 71 |
- `server/grader.py`
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
- `KNOWLEDGE.md`
|
| 74 |
- `MENTAL_MODEL.md`
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
Roopal mandatory finish-line responsibilities:
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
- keep the docs judge-friendly and fully current
|
| 79 |
+
- add Hugging Face Spaces README frontmatter
|
| 80 |
+
- keep the task story and public explanation simple and strong
|
| 81 |
+
- make only safe grader improvements that improve reward quality without destabilizing labels
|
| 82 |
+
- sync benchmark references in docs if any runtime change alters the numbers
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
Roopal optional high-value improvements:
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
- add a short TRL / GRPO usage example to `README.md`
|
| 87 |
+
- expand the issue-type similarity matrix with only a few safe, reviewable near-miss pairs
|
| 88 |
+
- add one or two sharper hard-case examples in docs if useful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
### Suyash ownership
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
+
Files already owned:
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
- `models.py`
|
| 95 |
- `server/environment.py`
|
| 96 |
- `server/app.py`
|
|
|
|
| 102 |
- `pyproject.toml`
|
| 103 |
- `requirements.txt`
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
+
Suyash mandatory finish-line responsibilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
+
- keep the runtime stable from the merged branch
|
| 108 |
+
- confirm Docker evidence on the merged submission branch
|
| 109 |
+
- add `.openenvignore` for cleaner `openenv push` packaging
|
| 110 |
+
- verify deployment assumptions around `app_port: 7860`, `/health`, `/docs`, `/ws`, and `/web`
|
| 111 |
+
- do a clean-copy install-and-run pass from a fresh clone if possible
|
| 112 |
+
- rerun `inference.py` after any runtime-side change
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
+
Suyash optional high-value improvements:
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
+
- enrich observation history with slightly more useful prior-step context
|
| 117 |
+
- support an optional `queue_size` reset kwarg if the change stays tiny and low-risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
+
### Shared responsibilities
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
+
- do not rename schemas or vocabulary
|
| 122 |
+
- rerun the benchmark after any code change that could affect behavior
|
| 123 |
+
- keep `PROJECT_STATUS.md` honest
|
| 124 |
+
- use the GitHub Actions Docker smoke workflow when local Docker is blocked by machine setup
|
| 125 |
+
- stop adding risky features before the deadline day
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
+
## Improvements Worth Doing Before April 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
+
These are the best ideas from the competitive analysis that are still worth doing this late.
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
+
### P0: Do before submission
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
+
- add Hugging Face Spaces frontmatter to `README.md`
|
| 134 |
+
- add `.openenvignore`
|
| 135 |
+
- make sure the merged branch has a green Docker smoke result
|
| 136 |
+
- do one clean-copy rerun outside the current working tree if possible
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
+
### P1: Do only if the repo remains stable
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
+
- add a short TRL / GRPO integration example to `README.md`
|
| 141 |
+
- expand `ISSUE_TYPE_SIMILARITY` with only a few obvious, defensible pairs such as:
|
| 142 |
+
- `onboarding` vs `service_request`
|
| 143 |
+
- `feature_request` vs `service_request`
|
| 144 |
+
- `security_compliance` vs `identity_access`
|
| 145 |
+
- enrich `history` slightly if it helps multi-step reasoning and does not bloat observations
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
+
### P2: Defer unless everything else is already green
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
+
- optional `queue_size` reset override
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
+
## Improvements To Avoid Before The Deadline
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
+
These ideas came up in the analysis, but they are too risky or too large for the remaining time window:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
+
- MCP migration
|
| 156 |
+
- transform-based reward refactor
|
| 157 |
+
- large dataset expansion from 45 to 100 tickets
|
| 158 |
+
- major schema changes
|
| 159 |
+
- broad prompt or inference rewrites that could disturb the stable baseline
|
| 160 |
+
- big dependency-management changes just for polish
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
+
## Date-By-Date Execution Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
+
### April 6, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
+
Primary goal:
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
+
- lock down deployment readiness and clean rerun evidence
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
Roopal:
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
+
- add Hugging Face Spaces README frontmatter
|
| 173 |
+
- keep judge-facing README language concise and strong
|
| 174 |
+
- review whether a small issue-similarity expansion is safe enough to land
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
Suyash:
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 |
+
- add `.openenvignore`
|
| 179 |
+
- verify the Docker smoke workflow on the merged branch
|
| 180 |
+
- do a clean-copy install plus `inference.py` rerun from a fresh clone if possible
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
Shared checkpoint:
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
+
- Docker evidence is green
|
| 185 |
+
- clean-copy rerun is complete or explicitly blocked
|
| 186 |
+
- no stale claims remain in docs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
+
### April 7, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 189 |
|
| 190 |
+
Primary goal:
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
+
- only high-signal improvements, then freeze
|
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
Roopal:
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
+
- add a short TRL / GRPO example if it can be written cleanly
|
| 197 |
+
- make at most one final safe grader improvement if benchmark stability is preserved
|
| 198 |
+
- do a final docs consistency pass across `README.md`, `KNOWLEDGE.md`, and `MENTAL_MODEL.md`
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
Suyash:
|
| 201 |
|
| 202 |
+
- make only tiny runtime improvements if they are clearly helpful and low-risk
|
| 203 |
+
- otherwise freeze the runtime and packaging files
|
| 204 |
+
- rerun the benchmark if any runtime-side change lands
|
| 205 |
|
| 206 |
Shared checkpoint:
|
| 207 |
|
| 208 |
+
- final benchmark numbers recorded if unchanged or freshly rerun if changed
|
| 209 |
+
- docs, metadata, and runtime all tell the same story
|
| 210 |
+
- feature work stops by the end of the day
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
+
### April 8, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
+
Primary goal:
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
+
- submit from a calm, validated repo state
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
+
Morning:
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
+
- run one final smoke test on the submission branch
|
| 221 |
+
- verify Docker evidence still exists on the merged commit
|
| 222 |
+
- verify `README.md`, `openenv.yaml`, and required files are present and current
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
+
Afternoon:
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
+
- make only typo-level or packaging-only fixes
|
| 227 |
+
- do not make risky grader, dataset, or runtime changes
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
+
Final submission rule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 |
+
- stop risky edits several hours before the 11:59 PM IST deadline
|
| 232 |
+
- submit early if the repo is already green
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 |
+
## What Counts As Complete
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
+
### April 6 complete means
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 237 |
|
| 238 |
+
- merged Docker validation exists
|
| 239 |
+
- clean-copy rerun evidence exists or a specific blocker is documented
|
| 240 |
+
- deployment-readiness files are in place
|
| 241 |
|
| 242 |
+
### April 7 complete means
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 243 |
|
| 244 |
+
- any remaining safe improvements are merged
|
| 245 |
+
- final benchmark reference is recorded
|
| 246 |
+
- docs and metadata are frozen
|
| 247 |
|
| 248 |
+
### April 8 complete means
|
| 249 |
|
| 250 |
+
- final smoke test is done
|
| 251 |
+
- submission has been sent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 252 |
|
| 253 |
## Simple Rule To Remember
|
| 254 |
|
| 255 |
+
Roopal owns the story, labels, and public clarity.
|
| 256 |
+
Suyash owns the runtime, packaging, and reproducibility rails.
|
| 257 |
+
Both of you should optimize for a clean, rerunnable, judge-friendly submission rather than chasing last-minute complexity.
|