RoyAalekh commited on
Commit
13426f7
·
1 Parent(s): 70aca0e

docs: Remove temporary analysis documents

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. docs/CODEX_LOGICAL_REVIEW.md +0 -519
docs/CODEX_LOGICAL_REVIEW.md DELETED
@@ -1,519 +0,0 @@
1
- # Codex PRs: Logical Correctness Analysis
2
-
3
- **Date**: 2024-11-27
4
- **Reviewer**: AI Agent
5
- **Scope**: PRs #4, #5, #7 - Logical correctness validation (performance not evaluated)
6
-
7
- ---
8
-
9
- ## Executive Summary
10
-
11
- All three remaining PRs are **logically sound** and safe to merge. No logical errors, broken invariants, or dangerous assumptions detected. Minor observations noted for future consideration.
12
-
13
- **VERDICT**: ✅ **APPROVE ALL THREE** - Merge without concerns about correctness
14
-
15
- ---
16
-
17
- ## PR #5: Shared Reward Helper for Metrics
18
-
19
- **Branch**: `codex/introduce-shared-reward-helper-for-metrics`
20
- **Verdict**: ✅ **LOGICALLY CORRECT**
21
-
22
- ### What it does
23
-
24
- Creates `EpisodeRewardHelper` class to centralize reward computation logic previously duplicated between agent and training environment.
25
-
26
- ### Correctness Analysis
27
-
28
- #### 1. State Tracking ✅
29
- ```python
30
- _disposed_cases: int = 0
31
- _hearing_counts: Dict[str, int] = field(default_factory=lambda: defaultdict(int))
32
- _urgent_latencies: list[float] = field(default_factory=list)
33
- ```
34
-
35
- **Logic**: Sound. Tracks episode-level metrics incrementally as decisions are made.
36
-
37
- **Issue**: None. Proper initialization and accumulation.
38
-
39
- #### 2. Base Reward Computation ✅
40
- ```python
41
- def _base_outcome_reward(self, case: Case, was_scheduled: bool, hearing_outcome: str) -> float:
42
- reward = 0.0
43
- if not was_scheduled:
44
- return reward
45
-
46
- reward += 0.5 # Base scheduling reward
47
-
48
- lower_outcome = hearing_outcome.lower()
49
- if "disposal" in lower_outcome or "judgment" in lower_outcome or "settlement" in lower_outcome:
50
- reward += 10.0 # Major positive for disposal
51
- elif "progress" in lower_outcome and "adjourn" not in lower_outcome:
52
- reward += 3.0 # Progress without disposal
53
- elif "adjourn" in lower_outcome:
54
- reward -= 3.0 # Negative for adjournment
55
- ```
56
-
57
- **Logic**: Sound. Hierarchical string matching with proper elif chain prevents double-counting.
58
-
59
- **Issue**: None. "progress" excludes "adjourn" correctly.
60
-
61
- #### 3. Episode-Level Components ✅
62
- ```python
63
- disposal_rate = (self._disposed_cases / self.total_cases) if self.total_cases else 0.0
64
- reward += self.disposal_weight * disposal_rate
65
- ```
66
-
67
- **Logic**: Sound. Safe division with zero check. Rewards scale with system-level disposal rate.
68
-
69
- **Issue**: None. Properly guards against division by zero.
70
-
71
- #### 4. Gap Scoring ✅
72
- ```python
73
- if previous_gap_days is not None:
74
- gap_score = max(0.0, 1.0 - (previous_gap_days / self.target_gap_days))
75
- reward += self.gap_weight * gap_score
76
- ```
77
-
78
- **Logic**: Sound. Normalized to [0, 1] range, rewards shorter gaps.
79
-
80
- **Issue**: None. Proper bounds checking with `max(0.0, ...)`.
81
-
82
- #### 5. Fairness Score ✅
83
- ```python
84
- def _fairness_score(self) -> float:
85
- counts: Iterable[int] = self._hearing_counts.values()
86
- if not counts:
87
- return 0.0
88
-
89
- counts_array = np.array(list(counts), dtype=float)
90
- mean = np.mean(counts_array)
91
- if mean == 0:
92
- return 0.0
93
-
94
- dispersion = np.std(counts_array) / (mean + 1e-6)
95
- fairness = max(0.0, 1.0 - dispersion)
96
- return fairness
97
- ```
98
-
99
- **Logic**: Sound. Coefficient of variation (std/mean) as dispersion metric. Lower dispersion = better fairness.
100
-
101
- **Issue**: None. Proper zero checks and epsilon stabilization.
102
-
103
- #### 6. Training Integration ✅
104
- ```python
105
- # OLD (buggy):
106
- def _compute_reward(self, case: Case, outcome: str) -> float:
107
- agent = TabularQAgent() # Creates fresh agent instance!
108
- return agent.compute_reward(case, was_scheduled=True, hearing_outcome=outcome)
109
-
110
- # NEW (correct):
111
- self.reward_helper = EpisodeRewardHelper(total_cases=len(self.cases)) # Reused per episode
112
-
113
- rewards[case.case_id] = self.reward_helper.compute_case_reward(
114
- case,
115
- was_scheduled=True,
116
- hearing_outcome=outcome,
117
- current_date=self.current_date,
118
- previous_gap_days=previous_gap,
119
- )
120
- ```
121
-
122
- **Logic**: Sound. Fixes P1 bug - episode helper reused throughout episode instead of fresh agent per case.
123
-
124
- **Issue**: None. Proper lifecycle management.
125
-
126
- ### Correctness Verdict: ✅ PASS
127
-
128
- **No logical errors detected.**
129
-
130
- ---
131
-
132
- ## PR #4: RL Training Alignment with SchedulingAlgorithm
133
-
134
- **Branch**: `codex/modify-training-for-schedulingalgorithm-integration`
135
- **Verdict**: ✅ **LOGICALLY CORRECT**
136
-
137
- ### What it does
138
-
139
- Integrates production `SchedulingAlgorithm` into RL training environment to close training-production gap.
140
-
141
- ### Correctness Analysis
142
-
143
- #### 1. Production Components Initialization ✅
144
- ```python
145
- self.courtrooms = [
146
- Courtroom(
147
- courtroom_id=i + 1,
148
- judge_id=f"J{i+1:03d}",
149
- daily_capacity=self.rl_config.daily_capacity_per_courtroom,
150
- )
151
- for i in range(self.rl_config.courtrooms)
152
- ]
153
- self.allocator = CourtroomAllocator(
154
- num_courtrooms=self.rl_config.courtrooms,
155
- per_courtroom_capacity=self.rl_config.daily_capacity_per_courtroom,
156
- strategy=AllocationStrategy.LOAD_BALANCED,
157
- )
158
- self.algorithm = SchedulingAlgorithm(
159
- policy=self.policy,
160
- allocator=self.allocator,
161
- min_gap_days=self.policy_config.min_gap_days if self.rl_config.enforce_min_gap else 0,
162
- )
163
- ```
164
-
165
- **Logic**: Sound. Mirrors production initialization with configurable parameters.
166
-
167
- **Issue**: None. Proper conditional logic for `min_gap_days`.
168
-
169
- #### 2. Agent Decisions → Priority Overrides ✅
170
- ```python
171
- overrides: List[Override] = []
172
- priority_boost = 1.0
173
- for case in self.cases:
174
- if agent_decisions.get(case.case_id) == 1:
175
- overrides.append(
176
- Override(
177
- override_id=f"rl-{case.case_id}-{self.current_date.isoformat()}",
178
- override_type=OverrideType.PRIORITY,
179
- case_id=case.case_id,
180
- judge_id="RL-JUDGE",
181
- timestamp=self.current_date,
182
- new_priority=case.get_priority_score() + priority_boost,
183
- )
184
- )
185
- priority_boost += 0.1 # keep relative ordering stable
186
- ```
187
-
188
- **Logic**: Sound. Converts agent binary decisions (0/1) into priority overrides.
189
-
190
- **Observation**: Incremental priority boost preserves agent's relative ordering if multiple cases selected.
191
-
192
- **Issue**: None. Proper override construction.
193
-
194
- #### 3. Scheduling Algorithm Invocation ✅
195
- ```python
196
- result = self.algorithm.schedule_day(
197
- cases=self.cases,
198
- courtrooms=self.courtrooms,
199
- current_date=self.current_date,
200
- overrides=overrides or None,
201
- preferences=self.preferences,
202
- )
203
-
204
- scheduled_cases = [c for cases in result.scheduled_cases.values() for c in cases]
205
- ```
206
-
207
- **Logic**: Sound. Uses production algorithm with agent's overrides. Flattens scheduled cases across courtrooms.
208
-
209
- **Issue**: None. Proper dict traversal.
210
-
211
- #### 4. Capacity Enforcement ✅
212
- ```python
213
- daily_cap = config.max_daily_allocations or total_capacity
214
- if not config.cap_daily_allocations:
215
- daily_cap = len(eligible_cases)
216
- remaining_slots = min(daily_cap, total_capacity) if config.cap_daily_allocations else daily_cap
217
-
218
- for case in eligible_cases[:daily_cap]:
219
- # ... get state and action
220
-
221
- if config.cap_daily_allocations and action == 1 and remaining_slots <= 0:
222
- action = 0 # Override agent decision if capacity exhausted
223
- elif action == 1 and config.cap_daily_allocations:
224
- remaining_slots = max(0, remaining_slots - 1)
225
- ```
226
-
227
- **Logic**: Sound. Enforces daily capacity limits. Overrides agent decisions if capacity exhausted.
228
-
229
- **Issue**: None. Proper decrement and zero check.
230
-
231
- #### 5. State Space Expansion ✅
232
- ```python
233
- # OLD: 6-dimensional state
234
- def to_tuple(self) -> Tuple[int, int, int, int, int, int]:
235
- return (
236
- self.stage_encoded,
237
- min(9, int(self.age_days * 20)),
238
- min(9, int(self.days_since_last * 20)),
239
- self.urgency,
240
- self.ripe,
241
- min(9, int(self.hearing_count * 20))
242
- )
243
-
244
- # NEW: 9-dimensional state
245
- def to_tuple(self) -> Tuple[int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int]:
246
- return (
247
- self.stage_encoded,
248
- min(9, int(self.age_days * 20)),
249
- min(9, int(self.days_since_last * 20)),
250
- self.urgency,
251
- self.ripe,
252
- min(9, int(self.hearing_count * 20)),
253
- min(9, int(self.capacity_ratio * 10)), # NEW: remaining capacity
254
- min(30, self.min_gap_days), # NEW: gap enforcement
255
- min(9, int(self.preference_score * 10)) # NEW: judge preference alignment
256
- )
257
- ```
258
-
259
- **Logic**: Sound. Adds environment context to state representation. Proper discretization and bounds.
260
-
261
- **Observation**: State space grows from ~10^6 to ~10^9 states (3 orders of magnitude). Q-table may become sparse.
262
-
263
- **Issue**: None logically. Performance implications exist but correctness is sound.
264
-
265
- #### 6. Capacity Ratio Helper ✅
266
- ```python
267
- def capacity_ratio(self, remaining_slots: int) -> float:
268
- total_capacity = self.rl_config.courtrooms * self.rl_config.daily_capacity_per_courtroom
269
- return max(0.0, min(1.0, remaining_slots / total_capacity)) if total_capacity else 0.0
270
- ```
271
-
272
- **Logic**: Sound. Safe division with zero check. Normalized to [0, 1].
273
-
274
- **Issue**: None.
275
-
276
- #### 7. Preference Score Helper ✅
277
- ```python
278
- def preference_score(self, case: Case) -> float:
279
- if not self.preferences:
280
- return 0.0
281
-
282
- day_name = self.current_date.strftime("%A")
283
- preferred_types = self.preferences.case_type_preferences.get(day_name, [])
284
- return 1.0 if case.case_type in preferred_types else 0.0
285
- ```
286
-
287
- **Logic**: Sound. Binary preference signal (1.0 if aligned, 0.0 otherwise).
288
-
289
- **Issue**: None.
290
-
291
- ### Correctness Verdict: ✅ PASS
292
-
293
- **No logical errors detected.** State space expansion is intentional and correctly implemented.
294
-
295
- ---
296
-
297
- ## PR #7: Output Manager Metadata Tracking
298
-
299
- **Branch**: `codex/extend-output-manager-for-eda-recording`
300
- **Verdict**: ✅ **LOGICALLY CORRECT**
301
-
302
- ### What it does
303
-
304
- Adds metadata recording to `OutputManager` for EDA versioning, training KPIs, evaluation stats, and simulation metrics.
305
-
306
- ### Correctness Analysis
307
-
308
- #### 1. Run Record Initialization ✅
309
- ```python
310
- def create_structure(self):
311
- # ... create directories
312
-
313
- if not self.run_record_file.exists():
314
- self._update_run_record("run", {
315
- "run_id": self.run_id,
316
- "created_at": self.created_at,
317
- "base_dir": str(self.run_dir),
318
- })
319
- ```
320
-
321
- **Logic**: Sound. Initializes run record on first directory creation.
322
-
323
- **Issue**: None. Idempotent check with `exists()`.
324
-
325
- #### 2. Run Record Update Helper ✅
326
- ```python
327
- def _update_run_record(self, section: str, payload: Dict[str, Any]):
328
- record = self._load_run_record()
329
- record.setdefault("sections", {})
330
- record["sections"][section] = payload
331
- record["updated_at"] = datetime.now().isoformat()
332
-
333
- with open(self.run_record_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
334
- json.dump(record, f, indent=2, default=str)
335
- ```
336
-
337
- **Logic**: Sound. Atomic section updates with timestamp tracking. UTF-8 encoding for Windows compatibility.
338
-
339
- **Issue**: None. Proper dictionary mutation pattern.
340
-
341
- #### 3. EDA Metadata Recording ✅
342
- ```python
343
- def record_eda_metadata(self, version: str, used_cached: bool, params_path: Path, figures_path: Path):
344
- payload = {
345
- "version": version,
346
- "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
347
- "used_cached": used_cached,
348
- "params_path": str(params_path),
349
- "figures_path": str(figures_path),
350
- }
351
-
352
- self._update_run_record("eda", payload)
353
- ```
354
-
355
- **Logic**: Sound. Tracks EDA version and cache usage for reproducibility.
356
-
357
- **Issue**: None. Clean separation of concerns.
358
-
359
- #### 4. Training Stats Persistence ✅
360
- ```python
361
- def save_training_stats(self, training_stats: Dict[str, Any]):
362
- self.training_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
363
- with open(self.training_stats_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
364
- json.dump(training_stats, f, indent=2, default=str)
365
- ```
366
-
367
- **Logic**: Sound. Saves raw training statistics to dedicated file.
368
-
369
- **Issue**: None. Proper directory creation.
370
-
371
- #### 5. Evaluation Stats Persistence ✅
372
- ```python
373
- def save_evaluation_stats(self, evaluation_stats: Dict[str, Any]):
374
- eval_path = self.training_dir / "evaluation.json"
375
- with open(eval_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
376
- json.dump(evaluation_stats, f, indent=2, default=str)
377
-
378
- self._update_run_record("evaluation", {
379
- "path": str(eval_path),
380
- "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
381
- })
382
- ```
383
-
384
- **Logic**: Sound. Persists evaluation metrics and updates run record.
385
-
386
- **Issue**: None. Consistent pattern.
387
-
388
- #### 6. Simulation KPI Recording ✅
389
- ```python
390
- def record_simulation_kpis(self, policy: str, kpis: Dict[str, Any]):
391
- policy_dir = self.get_policy_dir(policy)
392
- metrics_path = policy_dir / "metrics.json"
393
- with open(metrics_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
394
- json.dump(kpis, f, indent=2, default=str)
395
-
396
- record = self._load_run_record()
397
- simulation_section = record.get("simulation", {})
398
- simulation_section[policy] = kpis
399
- record["simulation"] = simulation_section
400
- record["updated_at"] = datetime.now().isoformat()
401
-
402
- with open(self.run_record_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
403
- json.dump(record, f, indent=2, default=str)
404
- ```
405
-
406
- **Logic**: Sound. Per-policy metrics storage with consolidated run record tracking.
407
-
408
- **Issue**: None. Proper nested dictionary updates.
409
-
410
- #### 7. Integration in Pipeline ✅
411
-
412
- **EDA Recording**:
413
- ```python
414
- self.output.record_eda_metadata(
415
- version=eda_config.VERSION,
416
- used_cached=True,
417
- params_path=self.output.eda_params,
418
- figures_path=self.output.eda_figures,
419
- )
420
- ```
421
-
422
- **Training Recording**:
423
- ```python
424
- self.output.save_training_stats(training_stats)
425
- self.output.save_evaluation_stats(evaluation_stats)
426
- self.output.record_training_summary(training_summary, evaluation_stats)
427
- ```
428
-
429
- **Simulation Recording**:
430
- ```python
431
- kpis = {
432
- "policy": policy,
433
- "disposals": result.disposals,
434
- "disposal_rate": result.disposals / len(policy_cases),
435
- # ... other metrics
436
- }
437
- self.output.record_simulation_kpis(policy, kpis)
438
- ```
439
-
440
- **Logic**: Sound. Proper integration at each pipeline stage. Captures metadata at point of generation.
441
-
442
- **Issue**: None. Clean separation of concerns.
443
-
444
- #### 8. Error Handling ✅
445
- ```python
446
- try:
447
- evaluation_stats = evaluate_agent(...)
448
- self.output.save_evaluation_stats(evaluation_stats)
449
- except Exception as eval_err:
450
- console.print(f" [yellow]WARNING[/yellow] Evaluation skipped: {eval_err}")
451
- ```
452
-
453
- **Logic**: Sound. Graceful degradation if evaluation fails. Warning instead of crash.
454
-
455
- **Issue**: None. Proper exception handling.
456
-
457
- ### Correctness Verdict: ✅ PASS
458
-
459
- **No logical errors detected.** All metadata recording is additive and safe.
460
-
461
- ---
462
-
463
- ## Cross-PR Compatibility Analysis
464
-
465
- ### PR #4 + PR #5 Interaction ✅
466
-
467
- **Scenario**: Both modify `rl/training.py`
468
-
469
- **Conflict**: PR #4 adds capacity/preference context to state extraction. PR #5 replaces reward computation with helper.
470
-
471
- **Resolution**: Compatible. Different concerns - state representation vs reward computation.
472
-
473
- **Merge Strategy**: Either order works. No logical dependency.
474
-
475
- ### PR #7 Integration ✅
476
-
477
- **Scenario**: PR #7 adds metadata tracking to `OutputManager` and `court_scheduler_rl.py`
478
-
479
- **Conflict**: None. Purely additive changes.
480
-
481
- **Resolution**: Independent of PR #4 and #5. Can merge in any order.
482
-
483
- ---
484
-
485
- ## Final Recommendation
486
-
487
- ### All Three PRs: ✅ APPROVE
488
-
489
- **Logical Correctness**: All three PRs are logically sound with no errors, broken invariants, or dangerous assumptions.
490
-
491
- **Merge Order** (any order works, but suggested sequence):
492
-
493
- 1. **PR #5** (Shared reward logic) - Low complexity, fixes P1 bug
494
- 2. **PR #4** (RL training alignment) - High complexity, but logically correct
495
- 3. **PR #7** (Output metadata) - Pure additive, no conflicts
496
-
497
- **No blockers for merge based on logical correctness alone.**
498
-
499
- ### Post-Merge Validation
500
-
501
- After merging all three, run:
502
-
503
- ```bash
504
- uv run python court_scheduler_rl.py quick
505
- ```
506
-
507
- Expected: Pipeline completes without exceptions. RL agent trains successfully.
508
-
509
- ---
510
-
511
- ## Summary Matrix
512
-
513
- | PR | Component | Logical Correctness | Merge Safety | Notes |
514
- |----|-----------|---------------------|--------------|-------|
515
- | #5 | Reward Helper | ✅ PASS | ✅ SAFE | Fixes P1 bug, clean abstraction |
516
- | #4 | RL-Scheduler Integration | ✅ PASS | ✅ SAFE | State space expansion intended, correctly implemented |
517
- | #7 | Output Metadata | ✅ PASS | ✅ SAFE | Purely additive, no side effects |
518
-
519
- **OVERALL VERDICT**: ✅ **MERGE ALL THREE** - No logical correctness concerns